Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 2 - Phase 7 Project Summary Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Shire Council Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan: Project 11
Summary
Methodology
Consequence Community Environment Council
Social Economic Financial Other
disrupted for up to a private properties) greater • Serious impact to a protected
year. than 50% of full species or habitat
replacement value. significantly contributing to
local shire extinction
pressures, requiring medium
to long term recovery efforts
(5-40% loss of an ecosystem
type, 5-40% loss of a
species, locally).
Moderate Minor long term or major Some repairs needed to a Medium term effects on Recurrent reduction Some impacts on assets
short term (mostly number of properties, with environment from single in Council operating damaged with programmed
reversible) disruption to cost to repair damage to incident. Examples include: budget of $250k to response, isolated loss of
community’s services properties between 20- • Material environmental harm $500k or one off capability.
(including to private 50% of the aggregate (significant effect and extent, loss of up to $1M or
owned critical property value causes $5,001 - $20,000 1-2% recurrent
Group of businesses in one
infrastructure), damage. reduction in branch
sector or locally within the
wellbeing, or culture budget.
Damage costs to non- • Immediate containment Noosa region put at risk.
(e.g. up to 25% of
Council owned critical required, medium cleanup,
community affected or
infrastructure (excluding some remediation required.
regularly used Potential for a number of
private properties) 25- • Impact to a protected species
activity/use disrupted for complaints resulting in
50% of full replacement or habitat, requiring short
between 3-6 months e.g. negative attention from the
value. term recovery efforts (in the
sandy beach takes 3-6 public.
months to recover) immediate area). (<5% loss
of an ecosystem type, <5%
loss of a species, locally).
Minor Small to medium term Minor repairs needed to a Short term effect on built or Recurrent reduction Minor impact on assets
(reversible) disruption to small number of natural environment easily in Council operating managed with minimal
community’s services properties, with cost to remedied. Examples include: budget of $100K to efforts. Some restrictions
(including to private repair damage to • Minor short-term impact, $250K or one of apply.
owned critical properties less than 2% of almost no effect, potentially loss of up to $500k
infrastructure), the aggregate property cumulative if not cleaned up, or 1-2% recurrent
Inconvenience to a group of
wellbeing, finances or value. reversible. businesses within one
culture (e.g. up to 10%
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.