Original source · versioned page text
8. Volume 5 - Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0084 & OPW16/0157 Development Application - Traffic Impact Assessment & Stormwater Management Plan (email 3 of 3).
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn LAMBERT & REHBEIN
ENGINEERS • MANAGERS • SCIENTISTS
Table 5 Post Development Peak Flow Rates
ARI (Years) Rational Method (m3/s) XPStorm (m3/s) Difference (m3/s) Difference (%)
Q1 0.061 0.080 + 0.019 + 31%
Q2 0.083 0.103 + 0.020 + 24%
Q5 0.114 0.129 + 0.015 + 13%
Q10 0.132 0.143 + 0.011 + 8%
Q20 0.158 0.164 + 0.006 + 4%
Q50 0.196 0.178 - 0.018 - 9%
Q100 0.216 0.199 - 0.017 - 8%
The order of magnitude of the XPStorm Model results correlate reasonably well for all intensity
events when compared with the rational method calculations.
Table 6 below compares the XPStorm model results of the pre development peak flows and the
post development unmitigated peak flows.
Table 6 XPStorm Peak Flow Rates Comparison
XPStorm Post Development XPStorm Pre Increase Increase
ARI (Years)
Unmitigated (m3/s) Development (m3/s) (m3/s) (%)
Q1 0.080 0.047 + 0.033 + 70%
Q2 0.103 0.079 + 0.024 + 30%
Q5 0.129 0.112 + 0.017 + 15%
Q10 0.143 0.128 + 0.015 + 12%
Q20 0.164 0.150 + 0.014 + 9%
Q50 0.178 0.162 + 0.016 + 10%
Q100 0.199 0.180 + 0.019 + 11%
Ref: B16239CR002 - 7 - Stormwater Management Plan
Noosa Energy Centre - Noosaville
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.