Council archive · source document
Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1
Very large file (35.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Flood Investigation & Storm water Quantity Management Plan BROWN
Proposed Residential Development at Doonella Stage C
-
S_trhur
The results indicate that the WBNM produces peak flows that are generally consistent with those determined by the
Queensland Rational Method. While the 2 year ARI flows from the WBNM are lower than calculated by the Rational
Method its significance on major flows within the environmental corridor and the immunity of proposed residential
allotments is negligible.
The adopted lag parameter, initial and continuing losses and configuration of the WBNM is therefore considered
appropriate.
3.2.5 Existing Peak Flows
The existing scenario WBNM, configured with the fraction impervious values as presented in Table 3.1, was run. The
results of the existing scenario WBNM and comparison to peak flows determined at the same location by JF&P (2008)
are presented in Table 3.7 below.
Table 3.7: Existing Scenario Peak Flows
Peak Flow (m3/s)
ARI
Existing WBNM JF&P (2008)*
2 0.89 0.91
5 1.42 1.28
10 1.75 1.51
20 2.20 1.83
50 2.61 2.32
100 3.07 2.64
*
-
Refer to Table 6 of JF&P (2008)report
The results indicate that the peak flows from the WBNM in general are slightly higher than those previously calculated
by JF&P. As the slightly higher peak flows will result in more conservative results (both in post-development peak
flows and sizing of detention storages) the existing scenario results are considered to be appropriate.
3.3 Developed Scenario Model
Under the developed conditions sub-catchments B, C1 and C2 are to be developed with residential lots and road with
open space reserved along the environmental corridor. Works requird to Sea Eagle Drive will also divert minor design
storm flows from a small external catchment into the site.
The WBNM was therefore configured and run with the developed scenario sub-catchment areas and fraction
impervious vales as presented in Table 3.2. A diversion was incorporated into the model to direct flows greater than
the minor design storm (5 year ARI) around the downstream site sub-catchments. No other changes to the model
were made from the existing scenario configuration. The results from the developed scenario are presented in Table
3.8 below.
Table 3.8: Developed Scenario Peak Flows
Peak Flow (m3/s)
ARI
Developed WBNM Increase (%)
2 1.81 103
5 2.53 78
10 2.96 69
20 3.55 61
50 4.09 57
100 4.67 52
B09182.w-02A Page 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 35.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.