Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 97
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
4.3.7 Option 6: do nothing
The ‘do nothing’ option allows the Dog Beach shoreline to recede without intervention and accepts
the consequences of a breakthrough event which include:
• Gradual loss of the environmental and social values associated with Dog Beach;
• The potential for rapid morphological change at The Spit following a breakthrough event, the
broader Noosa Woods area may be gradually lost;
• Increased exposure to coastal hazards for existing private and commercial development;
• Increased ‘normal’ high tide levels and reduced freeboard for existing development within the
lower Noosa River; and
• Increased frequency of ‘nuisance’ flooding within the lower Noosa River.
This option assumes no immediate investment in shoreline erosion management at Dog Beach. The
costs of intervention after a breakthrough event would be significantly greater than the cost for other
options presented in the SEMP. The construction would be significantly more complex and solution
likely to be a hard (rock) engineered structure. It is assumed the broader long-term costs to the
community and local economy could be substantial in comparison to the proactive intervention
options.
There are several potentially extreme risks to Council associated with the ‘do nothing’ option,
including:
• Political risks due to the increased threat to existing development;
• Legal challenges from impacted property owners; and
• Financial risks due to the additional cost for mitigating risks after a breakthrough event has
occurred.
Full details of the risk assessment results are provided in Appendix D.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.