Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1

of 109

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report                                                                                 98
Proposed Implementation Pathway




5       Proposed Implementation Pathway
5.1     Introduction
        A proposed strategy for managing erosion at Dog Beach and avoiding a breakthrough of The Spit is
        provided below, building on the understanding of the system presented in the previous Chapters.

        A trigger-based approach for coastal management was introduced in Section 4.2 and has been used
        to develop the strategy. Here the approach is embedded within the ‘risk continuum’ framework
        originally described by Fisk and Kay (2010). This approach was established to deal with uncertainty
        associated with climate change adaptation and planning. However, it has also been readily accepted
        and integrated into leading practice within the context of contemporary coastal management in
        Queensland (see Barnes et al., 2017). The risk continuum acknowledges uncertainty in the success
        of management actions and relies on ongoing monitoring and performance criteria to trigger changes
        in approach to achieve an overarching objective.

        The risk continuum is illustrated in Figure 5-1. Within this approach, it is important to define the point
        of unacceptable impact, i.e. the point at which the relevant planning outcome has failed or can no
        longer be achieved. Working back from this point allows identification of one or more triggers for
        enhanced management action and implementation to avoid reaching the unacceptable impact.




                Figure 5-1     Actions along the Risk Continuum (adapted from Fisk & Kay 2010)




G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
Log in to download the original file

2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1(PDF, 18MB).pdf · 18.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.