Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 98
Proposed Implementation Pathway
5 Proposed Implementation Pathway
5.1 Introduction
A proposed strategy for managing erosion at Dog Beach and avoiding a breakthrough of The Spit is
provided below, building on the understanding of the system presented in the previous Chapters.
A trigger-based approach for coastal management was introduced in Section 4.2 and has been used
to develop the strategy. Here the approach is embedded within the ‘risk continuum’ framework
originally described by Fisk and Kay (2010). This approach was established to deal with uncertainty
associated with climate change adaptation and planning. However, it has also been readily accepted
and integrated into leading practice within the context of contemporary coastal management in
Queensland (see Barnes et al., 2017). The risk continuum acknowledges uncertainty in the success
of management actions and relies on ongoing monitoring and performance criteria to trigger changes
in approach to achieve an overarching objective.
The risk continuum is illustrated in Figure 5-1. Within this approach, it is important to define the point
of unacceptable impact, i.e. the point at which the relevant planning outcome has failed or can no
longer be achieved. Working back from this point allows identification of one or more triggers for
enhanced management action and implementation to avoid reaching the unacceptable impact.
Figure 5-1 Actions along the Risk Continuum (adapted from Fisk & Kay 2010)
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.