Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Spit SEMP Final Report 73
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
Table 4-4 MCA Categories, Weightings and Scoring Descriptors Developed with the PCG
Category Weighting Highly Desirable (100%) Desirable (75%) Neutral (50%) Undesirable (25%) Highly Undesirable (0%)
Solution provides highly Solution provides effective Solution provides effective Solution provides limited Solution provides limited
effective reduction in erosion at reduction in erosion at Noosa reduction in erosion at Noosa reduction in erosion at Noosa reduction in erosion at Noosa
Noosa Spit for the duration of Spit for the duration of the Spit for the duration of the Spit for the duration of the Spit for the duration of the
the planning period, is highly planning period, is somewhat planning period but may not be planning period and may not be planning period, is not
Effectiveness 30% adaptable to future conditions adaptable to future conditions adaptable to future conditions adaptable to future conditions adaptable to future conditions
and there are no adverse and there are no adverse and there are no adverse and/or there are very minor and/or there are adverse
impacts to any other land impacts to any other land impacts to any other land adverse impacts to any other impacts to any other land
parcels. parcels. parcels. land parcels. parcels.
Whole of Life Costs ($ / 20 years) 20% Less than $1,500,000 Less than $2,500,000 Less than $3,500,000 Less than $4,500,000 Greater than $4,500,000
There is a high impact to local
There is minor impact to local There is moderate impact to There is a high impact to
Surrounding environmental environmental values or
environmental values in the local environmental values in broader environmnetal values,
values are undisrupted and moderate, broad impact in the
short-term but long term the short-term but long term causing significant disrupuption
improved. Including improved short-term but long term
values are improved. Including values are improved. Including or long term reduction. There
Environmental Values 15% fish habitat, improved flora values are maintained.
improved fish habitat or no negative impact on fish is long term impact on fish
habitat and no impact on Including short term impact on
improved flora habitat and no habitat, flora habitat, migratory habitat, flora habitat, migratory
migratory shorebird or benthic fish habitat, flora habitat,
impact on migratory shorebird shorebird habitat or benthic shorebird habitat or benthic
habitat. migratory shorebird habitat or
or benthic habitat. habitat. habitat.
benthic habitat.
Social values are significantly
improved. Including providing a
Social values are intermitently Social values are maintained. Social values are reduced.
usable all-tide beach, Social values are improved.
improved. An all-tide beach is Current narrow beach condition Current narrow beach condition
reestablishemnt of bush walking Including providing a usable all-
generally maintained, while is maintained, while is maintained or reduced, while
tracks, seperation of swimming tide beach while maintaining
Social Benefits 10% maintaining current boat maintaining current boat current boat passage capability
and boat traffic zones while current boat passage
passage capability. Visual passage capability. Visual is maintained or reduced.
maintaining current boat capability. Visual amentiry of
amentiry of the beach is amentiry of the beach is Visual amentiry of the beach is
passage capability. the beach is improved.
maintained. maintained. reduced.
Visual amentiry of the beach is
improved.
Average risk rating no more Average risk rating no more than Average risk rating is no more Average Risk score is High or
Average risk rating is Low,
Risk 25% than Low and/or highest risk Medium and/or highest risk than Medium and/or highest Extreme and/or the highest
highest risk score is Low.
score is no more than Medium. score is no more than Medium. risk score is no more than High. individual score is Extreme.
Total 100%
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.