Development Application Part 2 of 2 - Plans 7 Banksia Avenue Noosa Heads · OPW10/2120

                                                  PRACTICE NOTE GUIDELINES FOR LANDSLIDE RISK MANAGEMENT 2007
                      APPENDIX C: - QUALITATIVE TERMINOLOGY FOR USE IN ASSESSING RISK TO PROPERTY (CONTINUED)


         ()Il ql t'J 4TII'Ii RIXA AANA!.1 SIS Al4 "I'RIl -LEVEL OF RISK TO PROPERTY
                               [AKE1,IItOOD                                                                        >
                                                                                               CONSE Q U ENCES TO PROP ERTY (W ith Indicative Approximate Cost of Damage)
                                                      ludicalive Value of          1: CATASTROPHIC                     2: A'1AJOR               3; MEI)ILP 1               4: MINOR                      5:
                                                    ,\pproxhnnteAnnu;il                  200%                              60%                      20%                         5%                INSIGNIFK'AN'I'
                                                          Probability                                                                                                                                  0.5%
              1LMOS1' Cl{K'1',11(\'                           lit"r                          '1#1=            {             VK                                                   II                   M or 1, (5)

El            1,I10,U,1'                                      E(1'                                 l<,                     VI'l                        If                       M
                                                                                  a s.'
C             POSSIBI,IS                                      li)`'                                                       TIt     -                    M                        M                         VI,

1)            1INLIXha.\'                                     IA''                            ll                            ivl                        i.                        L                        Vi.

P;   -    RARE                                                10-`                            M                             L                          L                       vi,                        Vi,

          BARELY ('RI?I)i111,r.                               It)'                            1.                           'VI                        VL                       VI1                        1'l,
         Notes        I? )   For Cell A5. nay be subdivided such that a consequence of less [half 0.1% is Low Risk.
                      (b)    When considering a risk assessment iI In list be clearly stated whethct' it is Ibr exishtlg unldiIions of w'ilIf risk eomtl'oi lncasttres which m:ty 11( it be imple nemled at the current
                             lints.




         RISK LEl'E1. IMPLICAT IOr1 S
                                Risk l es'el                                                                                         Exam rlc Im lirutians (7
                                                                             I lnacccplnhle withaarl I 'calorcnt   Extensive rlrtniled iuveslipjili0n .roil ros, in li, pt1nnin2, and imhtmmmat»tinn of 115'SI nnm
                                                                             options essential to reduce risk to JAW: niny be loo expensivcnod not practical. Work likely to cost more tltno value of the
                                                                              pro crty.
                                                                             [Inaccelxablc Without Irenlmeut. Detailed investigation, planning and imple11icu1ation of L'eatmcnI options required to reduce
                tI                             I I1Gli RISK
                                                                             risk to Low. Work would cost a substantial stmv in relation to the value of the property.
                                                                             May be tolerated in certain circuutstances (subject to regulator's approval) but requires investigalioil, planning and
               M                         M[lt)l-.RA I I- If.Sl;              ouptemenlation of treatment options to reduce the risk to Low. Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be
                                                                             inlplcntented as soon as practicable.
                                                                             usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to reduce, the risk to this level, ongoing maintenance is
                I                              LOW RiSK
                                                                             rct aired.
                                                                             Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance prcx:edures.
              V1,                        VLRY Lc iW RISK
          Note:      (7)     Thu implications for a Iknticuhtr situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may depend on the nature of the property at risk; these the only
                              given asa general guide.




         02                              Australian Geonicenanics Vol 42 No 1 March 2007