Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)

of 1095

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

Original PDF page 995, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Form

Contaminated land investigation document

 

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses
NEPM Schedule B2 (section 3.4).

Does the CLID describe the environmental setting? Yes “ No

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses

Does the CLID describe local geology and hydrogeology?

 

of the NEPM Schedule B2.

NEPM Schedule B2 (section 3.5). Yes No
Confirm that the CLID addresses Does the site have acid sulfate soils? Yes Now
acid sulfate soils as per section 3.4 : :

P If yes, does the CLID address acid sulfate soils? Yes No

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses
environmental values of quality
objectives for surface waters,
wetlands and groundwater
developed in accordance with the
Environmental Protection (Water
and Wetland Biodiversity) Policy
2019 and s. 9 of the EP Act.

Does the CLID correctly identify and describe all relevant
environmental values including prescribed environmental values and
environmental objectives for surface waters, wetlands and
groundwaters? Yes W No

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses
section 3.6 of the NEPM
Schedule B2.

Were site inspection(s) undertaken in accordance with the NEPM
Schedule B2? Yes W No

Does the CLID describe those site inspection(s)? Yes~ No |

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses

 

section 4 of the NEPM Schedule B2.

 

Table B2 Conceptual site model (CSM)—indicate in the table below

whether the listed aspects of the CSM are addressed in

 

 

 

 

 

 

the CLID
NEPM Provided in the

Conceptual site model Sch B2 CLID?
The CSM was prepared and 41 YesW No
presented in written format, and
illustrated with suitable graphics and
flow diagrams.
The complexity of the CSM 41 Yes W No
corresponded to the scale and
complexity of the known or potential
contamination impacts.
The CSM was iteratively developed 4.2 Yes Y No
throughout the assessment process.
The CSM considered all essential 4.3 Yes ¥ No
elements.
The CSM identified and assessed all 44 Yes ¥ No
data gaps and uncertainties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 « Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023

Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900

Department of Environment and Science

Used in these records

About this file

File size
40.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25_0004 (As Published).pdf · 40.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.