Council archive · source document
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 995, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Form Contaminated land investigation document Confirm that the CLID addresses NEPM Schedule B2 (section 3.4). Does the CLID describe the environmental setting? Yes “ No Confirm that the CLID addresses Does the CLID describe local geology and hydrogeology? of the NEPM Schedule B2. NEPM Schedule B2 (section 3.5). Yes No Confirm that the CLID addresses Does the site have acid sulfate soils? Yes Now acid sulfate soils as per section 3.4 : : P If yes, does the CLID address acid sulfate soils? Yes No Confirm that the CLID addresses environmental values of quality objectives for surface waters, wetlands and groundwater developed in accordance with the Environmental Protection (Water and Wetland Biodiversity) Policy 2019 and s. 9 of the EP Act. Does the CLID correctly identify and describe all relevant environmental values including prescribed environmental values and environmental objectives for surface waters, wetlands and groundwaters? Yes W No Confirm that the CLID addresses section 3.6 of the NEPM Schedule B2. Were site inspection(s) undertaken in accordance with the NEPM Schedule B2? Yes W No Does the CLID describe those site inspection(s)? Yes~ No | Confirm that the CLID addresses section 4 of the NEPM Schedule B2. Table B2 Conceptual site model (CSM)—indicate in the table below whether the listed aspects of the CSM are addressed in the CLID NEPM Provided in the Conceptual site model Sch B2 CLID? The CSM was prepared and 41 YesW No presented in written format, and illustrated with suitable graphics and flow diagrams. The complexity of the CSM 41 Yes W No corresponded to the scale and complexity of the known or potential contamination impacts. The CSM was iteratively developed 4.2 Yes Y No throughout the assessment process. The CSM considered all essential 4.3 Yes ¥ No elements. The CSM identified and assessed all 44 Yes ¥ No data gaps and uncertainties. Page 5 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 « Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023 Document Set ID: 23717062 Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900 Department of Environment and Science
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 40.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.