Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)

of 1095

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

Original PDF page 996, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Form

Contaminated land investigation document

 

 

Confirm that the CLID addresses
referenced sections of the NEPM
Schedules B1, B2, B3 and B6.

For the CLID to be in the approved
form, the sampling program must
have collected sufficient data to
establish the nature and vertical and
lateral extent of contamination in all
relevant media. Where mobility of a
contaminant is an issue, properties
such as contaminant leachability and
groundwater and soil vapour flow

direction must be assessed.

For contaminants outside the scope
of the NEPM, the general principles
of site assessment in the NEPM
should be followed supplemented by
relevant State and National

guidance.

In determining the likelihood of
environmental harm being caused,
assessment must incorporate
identification of all relevant
environmental values and
associated prescribed environmental

objectives for the contaminants.

Table B3 continues on next page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table B3 = Data collection and analysis—indicate in the table below
whether the listed aspects are addressed in the CLID
Provided in the
Data collection NEPM CLID?
Data quality objectives (DQOs) Sch B2 Yes|¥] No[a]
process has been followed and $5.2 & 18
systematically developed and aligned
with the objectives of the site
assessment.
A well-developed sampling and Sch B2 Yes[V] No[]
analysis quality plan was $5.3
implemented.
Quality control checks and Sch B2 Yes/7] No[]
procedures were sufficient, and in $5.4, 519
adequate quantities, to measure the
effects of all influences on sample Sch B3
integrity, accuracy and precision.
All potential contaminants of concern Sch B2 Yes[Y] Nofj
were adequately sampled and 35.5
assessed in accordance with
recognised guidelines, in locations
indicated via site history and for all Sch B3
relevant media.
The completeness, validity and Sch B2 Yes|¥] No[g]
usability of data was adequately $5.6, $19
assessed.
Sch B3
The sampling design and execution Sch B2 Yes|[7] No oO
was appropriate for collecting s6 tos9 &
sufficient and accurate quality $19
assured data from all relevant media.
Sch B3
Sch B6
Assessment criteria were appropriate Sch B1 Yes No fl
to determine the human health and Sch B6
ecological risks of the contamination
and protection of any relevant
groundwater resources.
Assessment criteria included EP Act Yes [¥] No fj
environmental objectives for and other
environmental values as prescribed legislation
under the EP Act and subordinate
legislation for the locality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 + Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023

Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900

Department of Environment and Science

Used in these records

About this file

File size
40.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25_0004 (As Published).pdf · 40.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.