Council archive · source document
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 1000, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Form Contaminated land investigation document Section 389(3) of the EP Act requires a draft SMP to include the content listed in Table B7. If the CLID is not a draft SMP, tick the box CLID is not a draft site management plan (SMP): “” OR Table B7 Confirm the CLID provides the following content for a draft site management plan required by s. 389(3) of the EP Act above the adjacent table and move Summary of statutory Provided in the on the last row of Part B. Otherwise, requirements for a draft site s. 389 CLID? complete this page. management plan subsect * Use a Site suitability statement The proposed objectives to be (3)(a)(i) Yes template (ESR/2015/1857) for each achieved and maintained under the lot and place them in a CLID plan. appendix. The proposed methods for achieving (3)(a)(ii) Yes and maintaining the objectives. Each lot’s draft SMP should include relevant text from its Site suitability The proposed monitoring and (3)(a)(iii) Yes . reporting compliance measures for statement that clearly communicates the land. the permitted use of the land. *Site suitability statement(s) (3)(b) Yes Asite subject to a SMP is prescribed contaminated land since A statement of whether the land is (3)(c)(i) Yes contamination is present that may prescribed contaminated land. cause environmental harm if not If the land is contaminated— a (3)(c)(ii) Yes adequately managed. statement of the extent to which the land is contaminated. The CLID must clearly illustrate the extent to which the land is A statement of whether the proposed (3)(c)(iii) Yes ee objectives, methods and measures : stated in the plan are appropriate. depth, and extent of any water eontarninationt A reference to, and a copy of, the site (3)(d) Yes investigation report or validation A SMP is not appropriate if the report that relates to the draft site contamination is not adequately management plan. Scoot e methods oe A description of the source, cause (3)(e) Yes control measures stated inthe SMP | | and extent of environmental harm to are insufficient to prevent the site be managed under the plan. contributing to off-site contamination Was the draft site management plan prepared by a person other than the land’s owner? Yes No that is, or may, cause environmental harm. The definition of fand in the EP Act, includes airspace above If Yes, is a statement by the land’s owner agreeing to the draft plan land, land that is at any time covered submitted? Yes No by waters, and waters. If the draft SMP is prepared by a person other than the land’s owner, s. 390(5) of the EP Act requires the plan to be accompanied by a statement by the land’s owner agreeing to the draft plan. Page 10 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 + Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023 Department of Environment and Science Document Set ID: 23717062 Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 40.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.