Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)

of 1095

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

Original PDF page 1005, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Form

Contaminated land investigation document

 

 

If the CLID is not a draft SMP, tick
the box to the right and move on to
Table D5. Otherwise, complete
Table D4 to verify whether the draft
SMP complies with the requirements
of s. 389(3).

A draft SMP must provide for the
effective management of the
environmental harm that may be
caused by the hazardous
contaminants contaminating the land
by applying conditions to the use or
development of, or activities carried
out on, the land (s.370).

A site subject to a SMP is prescribed
contaminated land since
contamination is present that may
cause environmental harm if not
adequately managed. The CLID
must clearly illustrate the extent to
which the land is contaminated both
in area and depth, and extent of any

water contamination.

A SMP is not appropriate if the
contamination is not adequately
understood, or the methods and
control measures stated in the SMP
are insufficient to prevent the site
contributing to off-site contamination
that is, or may, cause environmental

harm.

Methods and measures must be in
the form of conditions. The
conditions must be certain, final,
specify relevant time frames and
clearly state what must be done or

not done.

If the auditor finds any part(s) of the
draft SMP do not comply, they must
return the draft SMP to the relevant
person and the SQP to be amended
to comply before the auditor

reassesses it.

 

 

CLID is not a draft site management plan (SMP):

OR

| verify, and provide evidence in my auditor's report, which has been
prepared in accordance with the Queensland Auditor Handbook for

Contaminated Land, that | agree with the site suitability statement and draft

site management plan for each lot.

| verify that the draft site management plan(s) complies with the statutory
requirements of the subsections of s. 389(3) of the EP Act listed in Table D4

below.

Table D4 Requirements of s. 389(3) of the EP Act

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of statutory CLID complies
requirements for a draft site s.389 | with subsections
management plan subsect of s. 389(3)
The proposed objectives to be (3)(a)(i)

achieved and maintained under the Yes
plan.

The proposed methods for achieving (3)(a)(ii) y

and maintaining the objectives. es

The proposed monitoring and (3)(a)(iii)

reporting compliance measures for Yes

the land.

Site suitability statement(s) (3)(b) Yes

A statement of whether the land is (3)(c)(i) y
prescribed contaminated land. es

If the land is contaminated— a (3)(c)(ii)

statement of the extent to which the Yes

land is contaminated.

A statement of whether the proposed | (3)(c)(iii)

objectives, methods and measures Yes
stated in the plan are appropriate

A reference to, and a copy of, the site (3)(d)

investigation report or validation Yes
report that relates to the draft site

management plan.

A description of the source, cause (3)(e)

and extent of environmental harm to Yes

 

be managed under the plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 15 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 + Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023

Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900

Department of Environment and Science

Used in these records

About this file

File size
40.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25_0004 (As Published).pdf · 40.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.