Council archive · source document
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 1005, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Form Contaminated land investigation document If the CLID is not a draft SMP, tick the box to the right and move on to Table D5. Otherwise, complete Table D4 to verify whether the draft SMP complies with the requirements of s. 389(3). A draft SMP must provide for the effective management of the environmental harm that may be caused by the hazardous contaminants contaminating the land by applying conditions to the use or development of, or activities carried out on, the land (s.370). A site subject to a SMP is prescribed contaminated land since contamination is present that may cause environmental harm if not adequately managed. The CLID must clearly illustrate the extent to which the land is contaminated both in area and depth, and extent of any water contamination. A SMP is not appropriate if the contamination is not adequately understood, or the methods and control measures stated in the SMP are insufficient to prevent the site contributing to off-site contamination that is, or may, cause environmental harm. Methods and measures must be in the form of conditions. The conditions must be certain, final, specify relevant time frames and clearly state what must be done or not done. If the auditor finds any part(s) of the draft SMP do not comply, they must return the draft SMP to the relevant person and the SQP to be amended to comply before the auditor reassesses it. CLID is not a draft site management plan (SMP): OR | verify, and provide evidence in my auditor's report, which has been prepared in accordance with the Queensland Auditor Handbook for Contaminated Land, that | agree with the site suitability statement and draft site management plan for each lot. | verify that the draft site management plan(s) complies with the statutory requirements of the subsections of s. 389(3) of the EP Act listed in Table D4 below. Table D4 Requirements of s. 389(3) of the EP Act Summary of statutory CLID complies requirements for a draft site s.389 | with subsections management plan subsect of s. 389(3) The proposed objectives to be (3)(a)(i) achieved and maintained under the Yes plan. The proposed methods for achieving (3)(a)(ii) y and maintaining the objectives. es The proposed monitoring and (3)(a)(iii) reporting compliance measures for Yes the land. Site suitability statement(s) (3)(b) Yes A statement of whether the land is (3)(c)(i) y prescribed contaminated land. es If the land is contaminated— a (3)(c)(ii) statement of the extent to which the Yes land is contaminated. A statement of whether the proposed | (3)(c)(iii) objectives, methods and measures Yes stated in the plan are appropriate A reference to, and a copy of, the site (3)(d) investigation report or validation Yes report that relates to the draft site management plan. A description of the source, cause (3)(e) and extent of environmental harm to Yes be managed under the plan. Page 15 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 + Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023 Document Set ID: 23717062 Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900 Department of Environment and Science
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 40.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.