REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)

Form

Contaminated land investigation document

 

 

For the auditor's certification to be in
the approved form, the auditor must
also complete Table D5. For this
table, a CLID may be either a site
investigation report or a validation
report. If the auditor finds any part(s)
of the CLID do not comply, and that
they cannot tick ‘Yes” to one or more
rows in the adjacent table, they must
return the CLID to the relevant
person and the SQP to be amended
to comply before the auditor

reassesses it.

The auditor may only tick “NA” in
Table D5 where sampling was not
conducted as part of the

investigation.

Table D5 continues on next page

 

| verify that | have undertaken my own assessment and provided evidence
in my auditor’s report, which has been prepared in accordance with the
Queensland Auditor Handbook for Contaminated Land, how the CLID
adequately addresses the matters mentioned in Table D5 below.

Table D5 Approved form requirements

 

Approved form requirements

Verification

 

Sufficient evidence is available to demonstrate that the
consultant(s) who prepared the CLID is/are Suitably
Qualified Person(s) under the provisions of s. 564 of
the EP Act.

Yes

 

The site history in the CLID has been completed in

accordance with section 3.3 of the NEPM Schedule B2.

Yes

 

The CLID adequately describes the environmental
setting in accordance with section 3.4 of the NEPM
Schedule B2.

Yes

 

The CLID adequately describes the local geology and
hydrology in accordance with section 3.5 of the NEPM
Schedule B2.

Yes

 

The CLID adequately assigns and describes relevant
environmental values of surface waters, wetlands and
groundwaters and objectives for the values prescribed
under the EP Act and the Environmental Protection
(Water and Wetland Biodiversity) Policy 2019.

Yes

 

Site inspections described in the CLID were sufficient
and adequately undertaken in accordance with section
3.6 of the NEPM Schedule B2.

Yes

 

The conceptual site model in the CLID has been
completed in accordance with section 4 of the NEPM
Schedule B2.

Yes

 

The conceptual site model in the CLID adequately
assessed all sources, exposure pathways and
receptors in order to accurately assess the risks to
human health and the environment.

Yes

 

Data collection for the CLID has been completed in
accordance with the NEPM Schedules B1, B2, B3 and
B6.

Yes
N/A

 

Sampling design and methodology outlined in the CLID
is appropriate and has assessed all relevant media in
accordance with the NEPM Schedules B1, B2, B3 and
B6.

Yes
N/A

 

Contaminant fate and transport modelling for the CLID
was adequate for assessing risks and has been
completed in accordance with section 10 of the NEPM
Schedule B2, if applicable.

 

 

Yes
N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 16 of 24 * ESR/2023/6339 + Version 1.03 + Last reviewed: 19 MAY 2023

Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900

Department of Environment and Science