Original source · versioned page text
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 43, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
• Photographic lithological recording, and
• Sequentially backfilling the test pits in the general reverse order of excavation, to minimise deeper
burial of any encountered waste materials.
6.2.3. SOIL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
SAQP Section 9.2.3 identified the PCOC and proposed allowances for NATA laboratory analysis of
selected soil samples for the DSI, which is reconciled in Table 11 below.
Table 11: DSI soil sample allowances vs actual laboratory analysis
DSI SAQP All soil or fill samples (PSI, DSI and
allowance DSI Actual soil screening trial)
Analyte (primary
(primary and QA) Primary Duplicates Triplicates
and QA)
Heavy Metals 173 174 176 15 8
Chromium speciation 5 3 3 - -
TRH/BTEXN 69 85 88 8 4
asbestos bulk (ACM) 46 5 5 - -
asbestos in soil (AF/FA) 35 29 39 - -
OCP/OPP 35 34 35 3 2
PAH 35 34 30 3 2
PCB 35 34 30 3 2
SVOC 23 24 22 2 -
PFAS 23 23 20 2 1
The above table excludes various ASLP and TCLP leachates analysis.
6.3. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
6.3.1. RATIONALE AND MONITORING BORE LOCATIONS
The site setting review indicated the site is not mapped as a potential Groundwater Dependant
Ecosystem (GDE) with an absence of any higher value ecological receptors on or near the site, however,
human health is of concern from any site derived contamination due to the presence of 26 registered
groundwater bores and potential for surface expression within a 2000m radius.
The closest registered groundwater bore RN185193 located approximately 184m south-east has a
recorded groundwater aquifer from 24 to 27mbgl in shale and quartz formations, with permanent
groundwater therefore likely to be present between 25 to 30 metres below ground level (mbgl).
Note that the actual groundwater levels during monsoonal conditions were much shallower over the
northern portion of the site within the Kin Kin mudstone formation, with groundwater not encountered over
the southern portion of the site within the Myrtle Creek sandstone formation.
Groundwater would be expected to generally flow in a direction sympathetic to the natural topography,
being anywhere from the north-north-east in an arc around to the east-south-east. Actual groundwater
flow direction may vary subject to various site and regional hydrogeologic conditions.
125 Lot 105 SP118458 Cooroy DSI 12062024 Rev0 Lot 105 SP118458, Cooroy, QLD, 4563
12/06/2024 39 Detailed Site Contamination Investigation
Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.