Council archive · source document
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 986, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Item Comments / Notes
If any contamination has been remediated on the land, describe the remediation in detail in a validation report (the
validation report may be submitted with a site investigation report so that the combined reports cover the matters detailed Not applicable
in the previous subsections of this section of Module 6).
The validation report must describe the remedial approach that was adopted (the approach should be developed in
accordance with the National Remediation Framework, which was developed to complement the contaminated land Not applicable
NEPM).
The validation report must describe the remedial strategy, how the validation criteria were developed, and explain why the
Not applicable
criteria were considered appropriate for the site’s particular circumstances.
The validation report must describe the contamination levels recorded on the land before and after the work was carried
out; and compare the contamination levels to the remediation objectives and validation criteria that were used to evaluate Not applicable
the effectiveness of the remediation.
The report must describe how the residual contamination levels were validated and demonstrate that the methods were
appropriate and statistically robust. Also, the validation report must assess any residual risks to human health and all Not applicable
environmental values as a result of the remediated state of the land.
Where appropriate, the validation report should include a copy of the remediation action plan that was developed for the
remedial activities and the remedial options assessment that was carried out prior to remediation. The ROA should include Not applicable
an analysis of the options that were available for remediating the land and explain why the preferred option was chosen.
3.1.11 Site Suitability Statement (also refer EP Act 389(2)(b) and Module 6 s.3.3.2)
was provided in PSI, with a
Section 389(2)(b) of the EP Act requires all statutory site investigation reports and validation reports to include a statement to be provided at
conforming site suitability statement (for every land parcel based upon the four generic land use categories) by a suitably conclusion of the works in
qualified person that first prepares the CLID and then bases the site suitability statement(s) on its findings, which may then the investigation and
be submitted to the administering authority (to achieve a statutory outcome) if it is certified by an auditor. validation document when
required for DESI submission
3.1.12 Contaminated Land (also refer EP Act 389(2)(c) and NEPM A, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5a and B6)
was provided in PSI, with a
statement to be provided at
EP Act 389(2)(c) requires the CLID to include a statement of the following matters:
conclusion of the works in
• whether the land is prescribed contaminated land, and
the investigation and
• if the land is contaminated—the extent to which the land is contaminated.
validation document when
required for DESI submission
Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 40.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.