REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)

                                                                                 Item                                                                   Comments / Notes
                  Provide details of the site investigations and the findings of those investigations regarding contamination of the land,
                                                                                                                                                  S.10 (no fate and transport
                  particularly the extent, fate and movement of contamination. Approved Form Item between Tables B3 and B4-If
                                                                                                                                                  modelling undertaken)
                  contaminant fate and transport modelling was undertaken, has it conformed with section 10 of the NEPM Schedule B2?
                  Provide details of the data quality objectives, sampling strategy, and sampling and analysis quality plan prepared to
                  support the investigation. B3-Data quality objectives (DQOs) process has been followed and
                  systematically developed and aligned with the objectives of the site assessment, B3-A well-developed sampling and
                  analysis quality plan was implemented, B3-All potential contaminants of concern were adequately sampled and                     S.4, S.6, S.8. and S.10
                  assessed in accordance with recognised guidelines, in locations indicated via site history and for all relevant media, B3-
                  Adequate Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) were established and an adequate assessment was carried out? and B3-
                  Statistical analysis (if applicable).
                  Describe in detail all: desk-top assessments of the site; site inspections; and sampling of soil, water, and any other media.
                  B1- Were site inspection(s) undertaken in accordance with the NEPM Schedule B2?, B1-Does the CLID describe those site           S.3, S.4, S.5, S.6, S.10 and
                  inspection(s)?, and B3-The sampling design and execution was appropriate for collecting sufficient and accurate quality         Appendix I
                  assured data from all relevant media.
                  Provide maps, GPS coordinates and diagrams, including cross-sections where necessary, to illustrate the site and where          S.2 (Table 1), S.5 and
                  sampling has taken place on the site or its surrounds and the location of identified contaminants.                              Appendix A
                  Provide details of a conceptual site model (CSM) presented in text, tables, and illustrated with suitable graphics and flow
                  diagrams. B2-The CSM was prepared and presented in written format, and illustrated with suitable graphics and flow
                  diagrams, B2-The complexity of the CSM corresponded to the scale and complexity of the known or potential                       S.5
                  contamination impacts, B2-The CSM was iteratively developed throughout the assessment process, B2-The CSM
                  considered all essential elements, and B2-The CSM identified and assessed all data gaps and uncertainties.
                  Describe the methods used to collect, store, preserve and analyse samples of media. Discuss any limitations to those
                  methods that may affect reliance on the results. Samples must be collected in accordance with appropriate standards and
                  quality control processes. Present the details of the QA/QC assessment and record the chain of custody of samples. If the
                  samples were handled and/or analysed by a third-party, identify the laboratory or contractor(s) that undertook the work, and
                                                                                                                                                  S.6 and Appendix I
                  state whether or not they are accredited (e.g. by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA)). If the
                  laboratory or contractor is not accredited by NATA, explain how the methods have been appropriately validated. B3-Quality
                  control checks and procedures were sufficient, and in adequate quantities, to measure the effects of all influences on
                  sample integrity, accuracy and precision, B3-The completeness, validity and usability of data was adequately assessed.
                  Describe and validate the methods used to interpolate and extrapolate, from the sampling results, the spatial extent
                  of any contamination. B3-The nature, and vertical and lateral extent of contamination has been established in all relevant      S.8 and S.10
                  media including off-site delineation if indicated by contaminant concentrations at the relevant land boundaries.




Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900