Council archive · source document
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)
Very large file (40.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 988, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Item Comments / Notes
Describe and illustrate (with data tables, maps, GPS coordinates, diagrams and cross-sections at suitable scales) the
location(s) of any residual contamination, and the quantities or concentrations of contaminants. Also, assess, describe and
S.5, S.8 and S.10
illustrate the potential risks of contamination either moving off the relevant land to any surrounding area, or moving onto the
relevant land from any off-site sources of contamination.
Assess the levels of contaminants against applicable criteria, considering all relevant environmental values, including
S.7, S.8 and S.9
human health, amenity, and ecological values.
Derive environmental values for water pursuant to the Environmental Protection (Water and Wetland Biodiversity) Policy
2019 and Australian water quality guidelines for fresh and marine waters (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000). Include criteria to
assess potential impact(s) on environmental values that relate to potential uses; for example, saline groundwater may be
treated for potable or stock use during a drought, and therefore has an environmental value. Furthermore, all
environmental values that derive from Queensland’s EP Act and environmental protection policies cannot be subsequently
disregarded or diminished by applying the contaminated land NEPM’s risk-based process. B1-Does the CLID correctly S.7.2
identify and describe all relevant environmental values including prescribed environmental values and environmental
objectives for surface waters, wetlands and groundwaters?, B3-Assessment criteria were appropriate to determine the
human health and ecological risks of the contamination and protection of any relevant groundwater resources, and B3-
Assessment criteria included environmental objectives for environmental values as prescribed under the EP Act and
subordinate legislation for the locality.
Assess how the levels of contaminants would impact on all current and foreseeable future uses, while taking account of the
S.10
likely extent that the contamination can be remediated.
If the land was found to be not contaminated, the CLID should justify how the conclusion was reached, with reference to
Not applicable
the site investigations and any remediation.
3.2 Draft site management plans (also refer EP Act 370 and 388 to 404)
Section 370 of the EP Act defines an SMP for relevant land, as ‘a plan for managing the environmental harm that may be As an SMP is not currently
caused by the hazardous contaminant contaminating the land by applying conditions to the use or development of, or required for the site, a
activities carried out on, the land.’ An SMP specifies conditions for contaminated land to manage the contaminant and relevant CLID content
environmental harm that may be caused by the contaminant in order to protect human health and the environment, and to checklist for an SMP has not
maintain the suitability of the contaminated land as certified by the auditor. been included.
3.3 Common requirements for all contaminated land investigation documents
Document Set ID: 23717062
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS - RAL25/0004 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 40.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.