Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Referral Agency Response - Planning Refusal - ERR25 0009 (As Published)

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 3.     The proposal does not comply with PO9(d) and PO9(e) of the Low Density Residential
                        Zone Code as the proposal restricts opportunities for meaningful ground‑level
                        landscaping and fails to demonstrate retention or replacement of vegetation that would
                        soften the built form. The reduced setbacks leave insufficient space for appropriate tree
                        and shrub planting to buffer the development, contrary to PO9’s requirement for
                        landscaping to contribute to residential character and amenity.
                 4.     The proposal does not comply with PO9(f) of the Low Density Residential Zone Code of
                        the proposed carport and associated structures are located well forward of the
                        established 6 m front setback and present as visually dominant elements within the road
                        boundary setback. This siting is inconsistent with the predominant character of the
                        streetscape, which is defined by buildings and larger structures being set back behind a
                        uniform front alignment. Such forward‑projecting structures are not considered
                        consistent with the predominant streetscape form.
                 5.     The siting of the proposed carport and trellis (new arrival over front courtyard) does not
                        meet Overall Outcome (2)(c) of the Density Residential Zone Code as the development
                        makes a positive contribution to the desired character of the residential neighbourhood
                        by achieving small scale well-designed buildings and landscaped outcomes that
                        enhance an open and green streetscape.
                 4.     REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE

                 Not applicable.
                 5.     OTHER DETAILS

                 If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available online
                 at www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices.


                 Yours faithfully,

                 Georgina Schramm
                 C/- Matthew Pinese
                 Development Planner | Development Assessment
                 Development & Regulation




                                                                                                          Page 2 of 2
Document Set ID: 24512711
Version: 3, Version Date: 05/02/2026
Log in to download the original file

Referral Agency Response - Planning Refusal - ERR25 0009 (As Published).pdf · 108 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.