Original source · versioned page text
2019-05-22 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 22 MAY 2019
The tender closed at 2.00pm, Tuesday 9 April 2019 with seven submissions received as follows:
Constructions Solutions Group
ICM Construction (QLD) Pty Ltd
M51A Contracting Pty Ltd
Metalla Pty Ltd
Midson Construction (Qld) Pty Ltd.
Ri-Con Contractors Pty Ltd
Travis Drenth Constructions
3. Tender Assessment
The tender evaluation panel (outlined below) comprised both internal staff and one external
expert who all undertook an assessment of the five conforming tender submissions.
Council Members
- Building and Facilities Coordinator (Evaluation Chair)
- Community Facilities Manager
- Aquatic Facilities Coordinator
- Project Manager, Infrastructure Services
- Work Health and Safety Advisor
External Experts
- Contour (Roof and Deck)
The tenders were evaluated against the following criteria:
Capability and Resourcing
Contract Experience and Capacity
Methodology
Quality
Health and Safety
Contribution to Local Economy
Price
The evaluation team met on several occasions to discuss the tenders with specific focus on the
timeline, project Gantt charts and the products being proposed. Additionally, clarifications of
tender submission responses, including the timeline and program duration, were sought from all
respondents and considered accordingly.
As a result of the evaluation Ri-Con Contractors Pty Ltd achieved the highest overall score and
were shortlisted as the preferred supplier.
The evaluation panel considers Ri-Con Contractors Pty Ltd to be the most advantageous to
Council and presents the best value for money. Ri-Con Contractors Pty Ltd’s tender submission
is favourable on the following basis:
Demonstrated experience with similar large value commercial projects of this nature;
Demonstrated good track record working for Noosa Council and on other similar projects;
Ri-Con Contractors Pty Ltd have the necessary resources and processes in place to deliver
the project;
Proposed methodology minimises impact on customers and staff;
Competitive pricing.
Page 4 of 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.