Original source · versioned page text
Annex 8 - Safety in Design Report V1
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
RISK IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT RISK EVALUATION RISK TREATMENT RESIDUAL RISK EVALUATION
Risk Name Causes Consequences Controls to be implemented to reduce risk Control
Owner
Accepted / Not
Consequence
Consequence
Residual Risk
Likelihood
Likelihood
Risk
Traffic Rock deliveries by truck Road accident Suitable handling and loading area to be identified. Contractor
Accepted
Injury / Death Traffic Management Plan to be implemented where required.
M
M
D
E
5
5
General Construction Risks Temperature extremes Injury Contractor to address in Site-specific Safety Plan Contractor
UV exposure
Excessive noise
Accepted
Manual tasks
M
M
C
D
3
3
Slips, trips & falls
Violence & aggression
Worker Fatigue
OPERATIONAL PHASE (INLCUDING POST-STORM & CLIMATE CHANGE)
Physical interaction with the Narrow walking spaces. Slip, trip, fall. Gaps around individual modules to be 1-4m wide at seabed. Designer
restoration substrate Rocks or oyster shell Cut from oyster. Rock size to be stable. Oyster shell to be placed to minimise displacement from structure.
(Monitoring Personnel or between modules from Injury or death Works are a restoration zone. Transit across the individual modules is not intended.
Public) construction
Accepted
Rocks or oyster shell Construction to alignment, levels and specifications on the approved drawings (except where Contractor
M
D
E
3
3
L
between modules due to modified in line with design provisions and approved by certifying engineer).
displacement from Rock to be stable and well interlocked.
works. Access gaps to be clear of rock and oyster shell.
Works to be certified by coastal engineer on completion.
9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.