Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
to a4
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Face ¢
|
scheme
standard is ’
more stringent
than the
standard
mentioned in
paragraph
(a} the
relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to
the extent it is
more stringent
than the
standard
oO mentioned — in '
, paragraph (a); an
{c) any other - ve
relevant Re git
planning .
scheme
standard that
is not
inconsistent
with the
standards
mentioned in
paragraphs
(a) and (b).
$08.1 Prescribed tidal work | PS8.1 The design and | PS8.1 Strand Gardens
does not have a construction of the submits the design and
significant adverse prescribed tidal work construction of the
oO effect on the is consistent with the prescribed tidal work .
availability of public following will not have an
access to foreshores, standards— adverse impact on
including public . public access to the
access proposed in (a) subject . foreshore as there is
the relevant planning Paregren i ) no current __ public
scheme. Oo does rot access only private 7
involve the access for the’ 2
, . adjoining residence. ee
: erection or . “~
placement of fon oe
° any __ physical ele.
: barrier feos
, preventing
existing access, oe
along a public °
accessway, to -.
the foreshores .
near the work;
: b) if a relevant
7 ©. - ee re : Pace 17 Set
. - “emanate - Response-to Information Request 9 4
LEGAL oa +> a ost eve Be oe seSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.