Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
AG 4
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST PAE
planning ¢
scheme .
standard is more
stringent than
the — standard
mentioned in
paragraph (a}—
the relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to the
extent it is more
stringent than
the standard
mentioned — in
. paragraph (a);
oO (c) any other
relevant “
planning eo
scheme —
standard that is .
not
inconsistent
with the
standards
mentioned — in
paragraphs (a)
and (b). :
$09.1 The location and design | PS9.1 Public access to | PS9.1 Refer to PS8.1. ;
of prescribed tidal work foreshores near the
does not adversely prescribed tidal work
affect the safety of is consistent with
members of the public each relevant
O accessing the planning scheme .
foreshores. standard,
$010.1 Prescribed tidal work | PS10.1 The design and|PS10.1 Strand Gardens
does not adversely construction of the submits that the
affect navigable prescribed tidal work prescribed tidal work is
access to, or is consistent with located within the
navigable egress the following Water Allocation Area,
from, any non-tidal standards- approved by Maritime .
: work lot. (a) subject to Safety 1 Queens‘and ;
‘ paragraph (b), if and wi not affect
the lot navigable access.
connected to
prescribed _ tidal
work (the
connected fot)
adjoins a non-
tidal work lot,
the work does
not extend past
. -* © oo Page18 ...*
emanate a Response to Information Request 9 ~ 7
. mee aSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.