Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
~
a
Ete .
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Fier a
: 4.
f 1
6
relevant -y
planning ‘
scheme
standard, to
the extent it is
more stringent
than the
standard
mentioned in
paragraph (a).
$012.3 Prescribed tidal work | PS12.3. The design and|PS12.3 Strand Gardens | . se
is designed and construction of the submits the design and | .- ~~
constructed in a way prescribed tidal work construction of the | _
to ensure it does not is consistent with the prescribed tidal work} °° >
} adversely affect the following will not adversely ae
stability of the bed standards— affect the stability of | ~"°“F
and banks of an ; the bed and banks of | 8%
tidal water. Y (a) subject to the Noosa River. Loe ard
paragraph (b), ..
prescribed tidal oy
work does not =
cause, by
changing the
flow of water,
the removal of,
or disturbance ‘
to, the :
sediment on , i
i. the bed and
: . banks of any a
tidal water; . m
(b) if a relevant -
; planning i
@ scheme wb. .
standard is Le
more stringent “ah meg
than the i vi
standard ; te
mentioned in ot i “ad
paragraph | “ st
(a}—the hes oe
relevant - . a
planning Sy pe I
. scheme moots
: standard, to co Tp Ng
, the extent it is Soe eyo
more stringent . ' wie
’ than the re
standard Tag
mentioned — in wt
paragraph (a). 3
- me iL
: _—— * ie , * *
©. - . Page 22 s 4
emanate Response to Information Request 4 # ta g
LEGAL . a oe
Jo oT. . wo. - oaSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.