Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
a af
to “4
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Fach -
5
oF oe recreational (a) subject to 8
. paragraph (b),
the clearance
levels under a
bridge are high
enough to
allow
continued
public use of
any tidal water ooo
over which it is tat
constructed; fo
(b) if a relevant
planning .,
scheme ;
@ standard is ~ sit
more _ stringent et
than the Sy TS
standard ow eth
mentioned in -
paragraph :
(a}the
relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to
the extent it is
more stringent
than the ”
standard
mentioned in Oy
paragraph (a). ae
@ $014.2 Prescribed tidal work | PS14.2. The design and|PS14.2 Refer toSO14.1. ;
that is a bridge does construction of the ra
not adversely affect bridge is consistent
the flow of water with the following
under the bridge. standards—
(a) subject to
paragraph '
(b}— 7
(i) if a bridge ‘4
“ can be -
. adequately
os, supported
. without
a erecting or
placing a
; foundation
support in .
: tidal :
water—no
. dl
. 7
“ © =: . Yop. Oe Ts Page 33 ne
: emanate oe Re inn Ras -
’ ‘UegaL t,o whe im ‘Response to Information Request — ot
a a ae rr aSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.