Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
fae "
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST PACA .
planning
scheme
standard is
more stringent
than the
standard
mentioned — in
paragraph (a)
or (b}—the
relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to the
extent it is
. more stringent
than the
© standard
mentioned _ in oo _
paragraph (a) * a
or (b). Cobh ot
$019.3 Prescribed tidal | PS19.3 _(s 6(2) solution) PS19.3 Refer to $019.1.
work | that is a The design and
retaining wall construction of the
revetment or seawall retaining wall
not founded upon revetment or seawall
rock, is designed and is consistent with
constructed to the following
protect the seaward standards—
side of retaining
wall, revetment or (a) subject to boa
seawall from erosion paragraph (c), a ais »
retaining wall, Dat,
revetment or en
seawall ee
® provides for a oye y
sub-layer or ~
enough filter
material to
ensure it is
reasonably
likely to remain
: in place for at
least 50 years;
(b) subject to
paragraph {c),
the bottom
edge of the
base of a
retaining wall,
revetment = or
seawall is
reasonably
likely to prevent a
© 4 Page52 ° ™
emanate oo ' Response to Information Request ees
. i : Os te : >
Vs } os # ~See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.