Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
TEE
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST jatag
RR . a . : . ~ Po om. .
standard
mentioned — in
paragraph
(a}—the
relevant
planning
scheme
standard, to
the extent it is
more stringent
than the
standard
mentioned in
paragraph (a).
@ $019.2 Prescribed tidal | PS19.2 —_(s 6(2) solution) PS19.2 Refer to SO19.1.
wor that is i The design and
fe vet ent en construction of the a
: . retaining wall, ee
seawall, is designed revetment or seawall Be
and constructed in a is consistent with mt
way to ensure it can the following
withstand— standards—
(a) any tendency of (a) subject to
Sliding. avd or paragraph (c), a
’ retaining wall,
(b) any other effects revetment or
of waves of seawall has a
changes in water factor of safety :
levels on the of no less than a
retaining wall, 1.5;
revetment or (b) subject to a
seawal. paragraph (c), a
@ retaining wall, fm
revetment = or ae
seawall is able =
to withstand
the effect of
waves, or
waves and
water levels,
resulting from
: a storm or ‘
other natural ;
event of a
magnitude
that has a 2%
or lower
probability — of
occurring — in
any calendar
year;
c) if a_ relevant
© . Page 51 ng
emanate » Response to Information Request re
: "3 a - cf. ~~See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.