Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

001A333D.001

of 114

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.

[8]              :
                                                       RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST            Pah

                           keeping with the standard of the dwelling being built by Strand Gardens.                ,
                           Originally Strand Gardens wanted wider regatta stairs (refer to plan at                 -
                           APPENDIX SIX). However during discussions with MSQ they were reduced to                  ;
                           sit neatly behind the pontoon.
                   4.2/1.3 itis noted in the LVO Report at APPENDIX FIVE that in Strand Gardens case
                           a policy compliant 5 meter x 3 meter pontoon which was connected to the
                           shoreline by a narrow ramped gangway did not provide a development that
                           was   “at a  scale and nature     complementary and respectful to their
                           surroundings”. A compliant pontoon would be 5m x 3m (ie. 15m? in area) the
                           proposal is for a 8m x 2m pontoon (ie. 16m*). Strand Garden suggest the
                           difference in scale is negligible. Further it is noted if one of the stairs which
                           link the walkway to the pontoon was to be removed from the proposal, the
                           asymmetrical result would not complement either the scale or the symmetry of
                           the house and the surrounding built form.                                [email protected]     Strand Gardens submits that materials and colours of the prescribed tidal             a
                           works will be complementary to its surroundings, refer to Development Plans        -  be
                           at APPENDIX SEVEN.                                                                   LS vs
                   1.5/1.6 The updated plans at APPENDIX SEVEN indicate the various HAT, LAT,            Hoy —
                           MHWA AND MLWS levels as well as illustrating the location of the previous           as a
                           structure and confirming its removal.

                                                                                                                 2

:            ©                                                                                  Page 5        ‘38
                emanate       -           Response to Information Request                                     oe   es
                               oe                    .   ” 2 oe eye                                             oF .
                             og ”                         :  -    te                                             .*

Used in these records

About this file

File size
7.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

001A333D.001.pdf · 7.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.