Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

001A333D.001

of 114

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.

fag!               :
                                                           RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST                 FA                "oy

           2.       ASSESSMENT AGAINST REVELANT SPECFIC OUTCOMES

            Please provide an assessment of the proposed structures with regard to the relevant specific                       ,
            outcomes of Schedule 4a - IDAS Code for development applications for prescribed tidal work
            of the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003.
            RESPONSE
            The following is an assessment against Schedule 4a. We note the proposal is in teh Noosa
            River and not in a canal.

            $01.1      Prescribed tidal work | PS1.1     The    design   and | PS1.1      Strand         Gardens
                       in a canal and for a              construction of the               submits that proposed
  ©                    private  purpose   is             prescribed tidal work            jetty’ pontoon   is  not
                       compatible   with  its            is  consistent  with              located  in  a_  canal,
                       location, having regard           the        following              therefore SO1.1 is not
                       to the following—                 standards—                        applicable.
                       (a)  the character and:           (a)  subject      to
                            amenity  of  the                  paragraph   (c),
                            work's immediate                  prescribed tidal
                            surroundings and                  work does not
                            the locality within               extend     past
                            which the work is                 the        side
                            located;                          boundary     or
                            ;                                 extended side
                        (b) if the relevant                   boundary of the
                            planning scheme                   lot  connected
                           states       the                   to the work;
                            desired
                            character     or             {b)  subject      to
                            amenity for the                   paragraph   (c),
                           work's                             prescribed tidal
  .                         immediate                         work    is  not
   oO                       surroundings  or                  roofed;
                            re cea    witin              |e)   a relevant
                            is  located—the                    P Nome
                            stated   desired                  seneme        .
                            character     or                  standard      IS
                            amenity                            more stringent                                                 oo,
                                                              than        the
                                                               standard                                                     oN
                                                               mentioned — in                                                  .
                                                               paragraph   (a)                                                4
                                                               or     (b}—the                                                  .
                                                               relevant
                                                               planning
                                                               scheme
                                                               standard,   to
                                                               the extent it is
                                                               more stringent
                                                               than       the
     ,                                                         standard
4                                                              mentioned    __in                                               -
      .        TTT                                                                                                       /  « .
             ©                                te        oy        °°                                      Page 6             7
                emanate                      Response to Information Request                                          :      ‘-

Used in these records

About this file

File size
7.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

001A333D.001.pdf · 7.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.