001A333D.001

*                       ;                              .

               Sunshine Coast Regional Council                                             Mae Areocamen          7
                                                                                                                   2
                             -the minimum stated in the policy is 3 metres and that provided by the
                             development will be 6 metres on each side;
                   b) No boat lifting device or boat storage is proposed;
                   c) There is only one jetty/pontoon:
                   d) The width of the walkway is 1.5 metres and complies with the maximum stated:
                   e) The pontoon is 2 metres wide but the maximum stated is 3 metres:
                   f) The use of timber materials is preferred and timber is the principle material that will be
                      provided (except for the pontoon, mooring piles, and stainless steel wires for the
                      balustrades).

                     4.4.3  Specific Non-Compliance with the Policy

Oo       39    The only specific non-compliance with the policy Is that the length of the proposed pontoon is 8
               metres whilst the policy provides a stated maximum of 5 metres.
         40    If one considers both the length and the width of the pontoon together (because most people will ‘ ae ve
               view the pontoon from an angle and not “front on,” the area of the proposed pontoon willbe.      a
                16m2 instead of 15me as stated in the code.                                                ome
          4)   Another way of considering the visual impacts of the pontoon is to consider the total length of one
               short and one long side. The proposal will provide 10 lineal metres whilst for policy compliance the
               total length will be 8 metres.
          42   | consider that without measuring the pontoon and knowing the details of the policy, the average
               user of the river or the spectator from the shore (including the adjoining neighbours) would not
               notice the difference. Furthermore, | consider that a policy compliant pontoon in this case would
               provide a less desirable outcome with respect to the scale and character of the nearly
               completed house and the character of the nearby area.
O

                                                                                                                  ay

                                                                                                                 *

                                                                                                                   ‘
                                                                                                                  #
                                                                                                                 ¥
                                                                                                                 2H
                                                                                                                roe
                25/02/2009                                        |         .                Page 120f22       kt