Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

001A333D.001

of 114

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.

.               -     7                .        .   7                               #
                                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                            LVO' ARCHITECTURE             t
                Sunshine Coast Regional Council                                                  Visual Assessment
                                                                                                                           4
                                                                                                                          i

                        5. VISUAL IMPACTS                                                                                  ;
          43    Strict compliance to the planning policy is no guarantee of a visually attractive waterway                 -
                structure. Observation of nearby waterway structures, which have been illustrated, suggest non-
                compliance with many but in my opinion they still maintain characteristic diversity and sense of
                place without necessarily becoming visually obtrusive.

         44     River bank settings apply utilitarian requirements quite differently to streetscape design. The height
                of the walkway is not dissimilar to nearby development.

          45    The attached list of illustrations show diversity and a lack of rigid design criteria. The requirements
      .         setout in the planning scheme do not necessarily account for site specific conditions and
@               requirements as illustrated below.

                                                                                                                          t.
                                                                                                                          Ry
                                                                                                                           j
                                                                                                                      .  . ide
                 25/02/2009                                                                        Page 13,0f 22       we,
                   .                                                   .                  >                        ,  ' * ‘ .

Used in these records

About this file

File size
7.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

001A333D.001.pdf · 7.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.