Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-26_Response to Further Information- Council
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 - Response to Information Request..
TfA Project Group Pty Ltd Noosaville
Further Information Requested Development Response
and batters must be located within the boundaries wall is within the proposed boundaries of the site
of the site). and proposed lot 1.
c) Relevant cross sections as necessary to illustrate c) Refer to the cross sections attached in the
the extent of earthworks and retaining walls amended drawings.
and/or batters.
Issue - Footpath
Existing footpath adjustment/reconstruction.
Information Required TfA Project Group Civil Engineer Response below:
5. Provide engineering plans showing the required
adjustment to the existing concrete footpath near the To maintain connectivity with Eumundi- Noosa Road, no
proposed access driveway to achieve compliant grades changes to the existing crossovers grades are proposed.
for a public pathway.
The proposed alteration only involves widening at the
existing entry point to allow access for a 19m AV fuel
delivery vehicle.
Further to the above, all detailed design will be
undertaken at the operational works stage. This is
typically the most feasible stage within which to
conduct detailed design as the bulk of changes /
iterations (both council and applicant driven) are
undertaken during DA stage.
Issue – Existing Stormwater Infrastructure
An existing stormwater inlet pit situated at the proposed access to the development site.
Information Required The stormwater inlet pit has been relocated to the
6. Provide preliminarily design plan to relocate/replace west. This has also been updated in the stormwater
the existing stormwater inlet pit away from the management plan as necessary.
proposed access driveway.
Issue - Traffic
There are concerns with the potential for queuing in the road and traffic conflict in the shared access area (easement
area), particularly in association with the future industry/retail development on the balance lot.
Information Required
7. Provide the following:
a) Justification to allocate four parking spaces (Nos a) Drawing No 15193 D14 Revision A is indicative only.
14 to 17 on Drawing No 15193 D14 Revision A) at Any future application over proposed lot 2 will be
the entry to the site. This is considered to create a subject to its own development application and
potential for traffic conflict and queuing problems. conditions.
It considered that this area more suited to a
passive use, such as landscaping or for future
stormwater bio-retention basin or water quality
devices.
b) A traffic management procedure to demonstrate b) It is considered that traffic management procedure
refueling will not impact on traffic movements in is not necessary. As per the Traffic Report prepared
Eumundi Noosa Road or the internal traffic within by QTraffic originally submitted, the site access
the site. Also, advise if time restrictions will be arrangements are consistent with the existing
implemented on refuelling operation schedules to arrangements, and are considered to be
address this issue. appropriate given the nature of the use and the
existing road environment.
Section 4 of the report states that the level of
traffic generation for the proposed development is
low, and once distributed onto the surrounding
Page 3 of 5 26/11/2015
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.