Council archive · source document
Response to information request REC13/0095
Very large file (46.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
’1
MAX WATTERSON+ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
9 10
1~1~11~~~~~~[~l l l I iIE ~ ~’1~E;;E;n
,’)
,-) 12th September, 2013
Ref: 10-3032
SCRC Your Ref: GC007:REC13/0095
tt\’dot6
The Chief Executive Officer
Sunshine Coast Regional Council
......~
.........-
Locked Bag 72 .
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE Q 4560 DavelOpment
COunter
Attention: Glen Conforti
.
.
"
’/ ..’
.
~
.
....
.
.,.;
23 SfP
’:~
.
.,:. ;~l ~ 1013 ..:~1~’-.
Dear Sir, ..’ =,:",:"’:
"~;;’f/. .
,,’
Re: Development Application for Reconfiguration
TeWantin ,,;,;r
"
:
55 Lake MacDonald Drive, Cooroy
Lot 137 on MCH978 and Lot 2 on RP173883
Applicant: Valkev Pty Ltd
I refer to the above-mentioned matter and your letter of Information Request dated 24th
July, 2013 and I respectfully supply the following information.
In response to the matters raised in this information request we have commissioned
Callaghan & Toth to provide the required information. They have provided the required
information in the form of a professional letter addressing each of the six issues. Please
find enclosed herewith the letter produced by Callaghan & Toth (Ref: Callaghan & Toth:
Response to Council’s Information Request, 24th July 2013).
Their response also refers to several other documents that need to be read in
conjunction, which you wi" also find included herewith:
.
Operational Works Design Plans 1225-17 to 1225-30 Produced by Callaghan &
Toth
. A professional letter produced by Brisbane Stormwater Management Pty Ltd
. An Arboricultural Tree Appraisal and Retention Proposal produced by Tree Fix:
Solutions & Consultancy
Please note that this submission completes our response to your Information Request.
I thank you for your consideration in this matter.
l~ L..~ ,-
Yours faithfully,
I Box: ~~.\R: .dO........1
Nicholas Gabriel
~ I
I
.......
~
,
y , I
\I
,
,
I
r~ ".
~ \ I
J
,
._..~.~
I
.._~~) 0-
I
\/ I~
::I....
I
I
\ I J~~ ~~.-
~ c
\
I I
I
..
\! " I
I \
I
\
\
I
I
_-_-.1.------ ___
L_~ ------
-’~ --~- ~-- -
T.
PRINCIPAL 12 Maple Street (PO Box 639) Cooroy Q 4563 ABN 59 847 644 252
Max L. Watterson PH 0754426121
Cadastral Surveyor (Qld) FAX 0754425125
I~
B.Surv(UNSW). M.S.S.S.I EMAIL [email protected]
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of pages 2 to 48 (of 53)
Page 2
"1
Callaghan & Toth Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd
ABN No: 45140292324
8/41 Sunshine Beach Road NoosaJunction
P.O Box 2305 Noosa Heads 4567
Callaghan & Toth
www.callaghwlandtoth.com.au
Ph: 07 5474 9081 Fax: 07 54749041
Civil, Environmental & Hydraulic Engineers
~
10th September 2013 File No: 1225
Sunshine Coast Regional Council
C/- Max Watterson and Associates
Dear Sir/Madam,
RE:" REC13/0095. One lot into 4 lots at 55 Lake Macdonald Drive Draft Conditions
We are writing to respond to information request dated 24th July
1. Information Required.
Attached are our OPW design plans 1225-17 to 30, which detail:
a. Longitudinal sections of driveways on plan 21
b. Plans 19, 20 and 24 clearly show the extent of any necessary batters, banks, drainage
structures and scour protection.
c. Plans 20 and 24 clearly show the extent of any earthworks necessary to ensure that the
overland flow is free draining.
d. Plan 24 shows a typical cross-section at the culvert. All culverts have the same minimum
cover.
e. Plan 18 shows the proposed trees for removal as per the Arborist report, which is
attached.
2. Information Required.
Our Reconfiguration plans show the driveway edge to the lots to be 1.5 meters off the adjacent
boundaries. During detail design, it was found that the driveways needed a 0.5 shoulder each
side and 1 in 3 batters as well as headwalls and outlet scour protection. These details resulted in
the driveway edge being increased to 2.5m from the boundary to give adequate separation.
We do not agree with the concept of combining driveways to lots five and 6as in the past there
arises issues as to where to put the fence and gates and who is responsible for fixing the shared
driveway and pipe. Therefore, we submit our amended separated driveways as shown on plan
19,20,21 and 24 for consideration.
3. Information Required.
We enclose a response from 8risbane Stormwater Management (8SM)to address this query
and Plan 1225-198,which accurately represents the regional flood extent on site including lot 5
based on Council Flood model levels and survey contours over the site.
Note that we also compared this to the Council flood extents on mymaps and found Council
Q100 mapping is completely outside Lot 5.
The adopted flood study for this area uses an average n value of 0.064 (n = 0.06 for bed, n=
0.03-0.05 for cleared flood plain). A small portion ofthe gully parallel to Wilgee Court fronting lots
5-7 has some existing Q100 inundation according to Plan 1225-198.
X:\Jobs\CT Projects in progress\1225 30 lots lake MacDonald DrivelCorrespondencelSlage 2 CorrespondencelREC Info requesl response.doc
Page 3
4. Information Required.
Attached are our drainage calculations for the ephemeral gully between lots 5, 6 and 7, which
show the flow depths in the 1 %AEP. Refer to Plan 1225-19B which shows a green Q100 line for
the local short time flooding.
A summary is as follows for Local Flooding:
. Lot 7: Local Q100 in gully has the highest relative level upstream of culvert at RL. .
1 03.475(driveway weir) + 0.063(maximum weir flow H) = 103.538
RL 103.538 vs. house site FFL at RL 104.25.
Minimum freeboard is 104.25 103.538 = 0.712 freeboard.
-
. Lot6: Local Q100 in gully has the highest relative level upstream of culvert at RL
1 02.883(driveway weir) + 0.155(maximum weir flow H) = 103.04
RL 103.04 vs. house site FFL at RL 103.34.
Minimum freeboard is 103.34 103.04 = 0.300 freeboard.
-
. Lot 5: Local Q 1 00 in gully has the highest relative level upstream of culvert at RL
102.579 (driveway weir) + 0.111 (maximum weir flow H) = 102.690
RL 102.690 vs. house site FFL at RL 102.990.
Minimum freeboard is 102.990 102.690 = 0.300 freeboard.
-
The proposed filling and FFL have a minimum of 300mm freeboard in accordance iNith QUDM.
5. Information Required.
The adopted flood study for this area uses an average n value of 0.064 (n = 0.06 for bed, n=
0.03-0.05 for cleared flood plain). We have had an approximate sensitivity assessment of the
flood data in relation to Lot 5 carried out by BSM (Brisbane Stormwater Management) which is
enclosed and as shown on Plan 1225-19B.
As noted previously, our representation of existing model Q1 00 shows that a small portion of the
gully parallel to Wilgee Court fronting lot 5 has some existing Q100 inundation (Plan 1225-19B).
The house sites are to be filled to increase the freeboard and a minimum floor level as shown on
Plan 1225-198.
As an additional measure to account for possible increase in n values and flood levels we have
shown allotment filling levels to suit an n value of 0.10 and sensitivity to n = 0.15.
A summary of Lot 5 Q1 00 levels is as per attached BSM letter.
The effective allotment extent is considered to be the filled portion west of the ephemeral gully
which will be flood free based on sensitivity analysis of n values. A drainage easement will cover
the remaining portion of the lot in the ephemeral gully and prevent future owners from using this
part of the land for structures.
X:\JOBSICT Projects In progre..I1225 30 lols lake MacOonald DrlvalCorrespondancalSlaga 2 CorraspondencelREC Info request r.opon....doc
Page 4
6. Information Required.
to treat water quality for
We believed that raingardens in each lot are the only practical measure
the systems. In
these three lots given Council’s constraints on siting access and maintaining
not building new street
recent years urban OPWs for two to five lot subdivisions where we are
Treatment devices therefore it is not considered
frontage did not require Stormwater Quality
reasonable to request them for this instance.
The following alternatives have been investigated and rejected:
is not feasible to pipe water
. Due to the gully separating the road from the house sites, it
in the Wilgee street road reserve.
across the gully to a bio treatment system
. A bio device could be
below the Q 100
placedadjacent the southeast boundary of lot 5
.
however, it would have no maintenance access.
future lot 13 would be also
. A similar device in the southwest corner of lot 5 or possible
easement and track over the
impossible to access without a long temporary access
balance land. This would put an unreasonable restriction on the future options for the
the Refer to
balance land. There is also the issue of future sewers crossing
area.
attached Master Sewer Plan 1225-3008.
to the
. Lot 13 in the future development will have its roofwater and driveway discharge
the cul-de-sac head. The
street and then be treated by the bio basin proposed for beside
lots and the bio basin
remaining back will be modelled in Music with the rest of the
yard
sized to ensure that the water quality targets are met.
be no other feasible solution to
Since Council do not prefer Raingardens there appears to
site conditions and small
include Water Quality Improvement Devices. Due to the constrained
the requirement for
number of lots on an existing road frontage, we request that Council remove
Water Quality Improvement Devices on this stage.
Yours faithfully,
Callaghan & Toth
~z=5
A Haynes BE Civil (Hans)RPEQ MIEAust CPEng
and terms and conditions for services rendered
Please view www.callaghanandtoth.com.au for all information on our company profile
Cc Alex Mc Williams
Max Watterson
2 CorrespondencelREC Info request response.doc
X:\JobsICT Projects In progressl1225 30 lots lake MacDonald DrlvelCorrespondencelStage
Page 5
SSM
’
"
Your Reference:
Our Reference: 2013-08
Brisbane Stonnwater Management Pty Ltd
ACN 094 878 734 ABN 75 094 878 734
92 Alkoomie Street, Wynnum Nth, Qld
PO Box 8119, Wynnum Nth, Q 4178
Date: 6 Sept 2013 Ph 07 33963383 Fax 07 39010285
Email: [email protected]
Callaghan & Toth
POBox 2305,Noosa Heads, Q4567
Attn: Mr Lex Toth
Dear Sir,
Re: Proposed 3 Lot Subdivision At 55 Lake MacDonald Drive, Cooroy
In response to your emailed request of 16 August 2013,I offer
my advice in relation to Items 3 and 5 of
SeRC’s 24 July 2013 request for further infonnation about the above proposal; namely-
3 Provide an amendedplan which accurately represents the regionalflood extent on site (Council
flood extent mapping indicates thatpart ofLot 5 is within inundation extents).
5 Provide additional information (or an updatedflood study) which demonstrates the roughness
(manning’s)assumptions adopted in the originalflood study allow for revegetation ofthe main
drainage line. Alternatively provide a sensitivity analysis ofincreased roughness assumptions and
amendflood level extents and lot layout as necessary
The 100 Year Flood Boundary For The Existing Floodplain Condition
Lawson & Treloar Pty Ltd (L&T)undertook a flood study ofthe creeks in the Cooroy area for Council
in July 2002.I understand that some parts ofthat study have recently been updated for Council
by other
consultants, but the updated parts do not include the tributary alongside the proposed subdivision.
Accordingly, I have fonnulated my following advice on the basis that the 2002 L&T flood study is the
latest available study of flood levels in the subject area.
The schematic on the following page of this letter illustrates the floodway / subdivision scenario. One
ofL&T’s model cross-sections abuts the upstream boundary of Lot 5, and that lot extends about 35
percent of the floodway distance between that cross-section and the next downstream cross-section. I
understand that L&T’s predictions of the 100 year flqod levels at those two cross-sections, for their
assessment ofthe existing Manning’s n values, are respectively 101.79 m AHD and 100.62 m AHD,a<;
marked in the last row of data in the schematic. I therefore infer that the 100
year flood level at the
upstream boundary of Lot 5 for the existing floodway condition is 101.79 m AHD,and by arbitrarily
proportioning 35 percent ofthe level differential between the upstream and downstream cross-sections,
B5M Doc File 5SLkMacD RFLDoc
Page 1
_
Page 6
I infer that the corresponding 100 year flood level at the downstream boundary of Lot 5 is 101.38 m
AHD,as also indicated in the last row of the schematic.
I note that Callaghan & Toth have already redrawn the existing 100
year flood boundary on their
drawing number 1225-19 to accord with the above advice, and for the sake of completeness I have
attached a copy ofthat revised drawing to this letter. The redrawn line is based on field survey of the
topography ofLot 5,rather than Council’s Lidar topography,and is transcribed to the schematic below.
The existing 100 year flood boundary is seen to be mostly outside the boundary of Lot 5, except for a
small area at the south-east corner ofthe lot. Please note that the flood boundary on the schematic does
not include the flood boundary alongside the local gully, which runs alongside the eastern boundary of
the lot. Please also note that the proposed filling of Lot 5 extends across the southern boundary ofthe
lot and intrudes slightly into the existing flood 100 year boundary the area offilled flood storage will -
be 12 metre long, with a maximum width of 1.2 metres and a maximum depth of0.08 metre, for which
a prismoidal approximation suggests a displaced floodplain
storage volume ofjust 0.4 cubic metre. This
loss of storage should not adversely affect upstream and downstream interests.
Proposed Min.F Levels: 102.99
102.68
Inferred 100 yr flood boundaries, Pre-fi!ling
’\
For n = 0.15 Post-Filling
\..
’\
0 yr flood boundary
Based on L&T flood levels _
For existing n values
~\.
\\
LOT 5
---______---_
v’, /1
-t:,?f) : Proposed toe of fill :
<;)
f:> 1 1
: 4f"~/1\I :
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
100 year Flood levels (mAHD) \
.,
1
1 , 1
85M inference for n value of 0.15
100.89 101.66 102.07
(50%more than 0.10 ~ Add 0.14 m) 1 1 1
1 1 1
BSM inference for n value of 0.10
~ ~ ~
100.75 101.52 101.93
(25%more than 0.08 ~ Add 0.07 m ) I 1 1
I 1 1
I I 1
1 I 1
L&T prediction for existing n values + 25 % I I 1
Adds 0.06 -
0.07 m to the existing flood levels 100.68 101.45 101.86
I I I
(BSM inference ~ n = 1.25 x 0.064 = 0.080 ) I I I
I 1 1
I 1 I
L&T prediction for existing n values of: I I I
1 I 1
Creek bed 0.06 I I I
! ~ ~
Cleared floodplain 0.03 to 0.05
100.62 101.38 101.79
Uncleared floodplain 0.06 to 0.12 I I
I I
(BSM inference ~ average n 0.064 ) I I
,
I
8SM interpolation of flood levels at 35% of the distance from the U/S XSect to the Dls XSect -
The 100 Year Flood Boundary For A Revegetated Floodplain
I have been advised by Council’s officers that they are seeking a sensitivity analysis for Manning’s n
values of 0.1 0 and 0.15.
BSM Doc File 55LkMacD RFI.Doc
Page 2
_
Page 7
I understand that L&T’s assessment of the existing Manning’s values ranged from 0.06 in the creek
be~ to 0.03 -
0.06 in the cleared floodplain areas, to 0.06 -
0.12 in the uncleared floodplain areas.
Given that the overbank areas in the subject vicinity are mostly grassed paddocks, I infer that L&T’s
model would have simulated an average n value across the floodway ofjust below 0.065 at these cross-
sections; -
or nominally 0.064 as I have indicated in the last row of the preceding schematic.
I understand that L&T also undertook a sensitivity analysis with Manning’s n values 25 percent higher
than the existing values, resulting in the flood levels in the second-last row ofthe preceding schematic.
These flood levels are 0.07 meter higher than the corresponding levels for the existing floodplain
condition. On the basis ofmy nominal inference about average n values in the preceding paragraph, the
L&T model probably simulated an averaged Manning’s n value ofabout 0.064 + 25% =
0.080 for this
sensitivity scenario, still short of Council’s requested values of 0.10 and 0.15.
I have used the abovementioned L&T sensitivity test as a guide to the impacts offurther increases in the
Manning’s n value. An increase in the Manning’s value to 0.10 would represent a 25 percent increase
on the abovementioned value of 0.080, or the same % increase as in L&T’s sensitivity test. This
suggests that a Manning’s n of 0.1 0 would add about another 0.07 metre to L&T’s sensitivity flood
levels, thereby resulting in the flood levels in the third-last row of the preceding schematic. A further
increase,to a Manning’s n 0.15,would represent a 50 percent increase on the value of0.10, or double
the percentage increase in L&T’s sensitivity test, which suggests that this would add about twice 0.07
metre (i.e. 0.14 metre) to the flood levels for the 0.10 value as indicated in the top row of the
-
preceding schematic.
Both ofthe abovementioned increases in Manning’s n value (to 0.10 and 0.15)would, in the absence of
any allotment filling, shift the 100 year flood boundary inside the Lot 5 boundary, as indicated for the
"Pre-Filling"scenario on Callaghan &Toth’s attached drawing and in the schematic on the preceding
page of this letter. However, Lot 5 is proposed to be filled to and beyond the lot boundary, thereby
raising the topography at the lot boundary enough to prevent any additional intrusion of the flood
boundary into the lot, as indicated by the realigned 100 year flood boundaries for the "Post-Filling /
n=0.15" scenario on the attached drawing and in the schematic. The house-pad is proposed to be filled
to a minimum level of 102.68 m AHD, or 0.61 metre higher than the 100 year flood level at the
upstream comer ofthe lot for a Manning’s n of0.15. Given that the 100 year flood depth in this area is
about 1.8 metre, that clearance of 0.61 metre represents a freeboard of about 34 percent of the flood
depth, above the "fully revegetated" flood level. The floor level on Lot 5 is proposed to be even higher,
at 102.99 m AHD,resulting in a freeboard of 0.92 metre (ormore than 50 percent ofthe flood depth)
above the "fully revegetated" flood level. I acknowledge that the abovementioned flood levels for the
revegetated floodway have been derived from some approximate inferences rather than detailed
modelling, but I suggest that the generosity ofthe abovementioned freeboards will be more than enough
to offset any shortcomings in those inferences.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any clarification of the above advice. In the
meantime, I remain,
Yours faithfully,
(?
~".~~
~"-~
Denis Ogle, RPEQ 2405, Director.
8SM Doc File 55LkMacD RFI.Doc
Page 3
Page 8
DRIVEWAY SETOUT fOR LOIS 5 TO
EDGE Of’ CONCRETE AT FINISHED LEVEL
Callaghan & Toth
Civil, Environmental &
SJ
PONT E.ST1NG NORTHING
Hydraulic Engincoel’S
I X-41l1585.81l7 Y-7071l187.76J
\ PO aox 2lOS
2 X-4g1~U595 Y.707SI a9,53O NOOSA .v.DS 4-S7
3 )(_4;1574,249 Y.7019190.691
"’41__-
PhoM 54749011, rOt 547+9041
4 X-491574.711 Y-7079193. ~ _.ootIoPanonclottl.eom.o"
~ X-491!)62.521 Y-7079192.437 NIt N
6 X-491586.642 Y-7079190.703 drown III
7 X-491588.519 _...
Y-7079195.274
. X-491583.654 Y_707tiI191.J21
9 X-491575.013 Y-7079198.6~9 .....
10 X-491575.535 Y-7079Z01.62J
11
IN WIImIt5 .
ASSOC:M1ES
X-491584.478 Y-7079ZOO.229
PHOHE 54 426 121
12 X-491589.683 Y-7079198.040
13 X-491591.869 V-7079211.361
X-491593.076
,..;.01
14 Y.7079219.395
15 X-491569.805 Y-7079223.023 PROPOSED 3 lOT
16 X-491570.267 Y-7079225.9S7
SUBDMSION AT 55 lAKE
17 X-491593.905 Y-7079222.302
Woc:OOIWD DRM: COOROY
18 X-491599.041 Y-7079220.122
llilIE;
AU. ORMWAYS TO BE CONS11M:ITD TO
STAHOARO DRA_ IPWf-"l SEO R-050
& TO ~PlAH 122~21.
ALSO REFER TO _Y SETOUT TAIIlE
FOR DETAIlEQ SETTIIC OUT.
[:... PlY llD
\I
llilIE;
REFER TO PlAH 1225-23 FOR OO.\llED
[~PlAN1Of2
SETOUT (1f STOR....TER PIPE5 &
STAHOARO DRAWINGS USTEO OH PlAH
1225-17.
lOT 136 on WCH978
I
I \
PariIh at 1EWAHTJj
County at YARCH
SUNSIH ~coua.
I.ocaIty at lAKE Ib:llONAIJ)
I \ SCALE
=
"...
LEGEND’ PROPOSED SERViCES I~ $ICU __ "~.-...0 XJU
OOI SCAl[.....1HIS~
RE\1SIONS
\ PROPOSal HOOSE SITE tW dtt<. .....
./
\ A Rf.\1:SED lOT LOO.S ,litO 0100 08 13
/’" B RE\1S!D RTW AHO FU lMl.S 08 13
\..
"
’----r-
/.-
PROPOSal MNIIIC
PATH
----
~ PROPOSED RET~NlHC iI\U. TO ru:s
DETAIL OH PlAH 1225-20
~Ocrm
,
" .~ PROPOSED f’HSI ~l.E’ " CT ....
lake Woc:OonoId 0I’IYt
~ 1225 30 lob
CWTlnt DWC-Q.\SE
0100 FlOOO lH’ CIR!EHT sruor
n=O.064 (,IPPfiOXlllAll’ W FlOOO) rolAPPKOVAL
0100 FlOOO LtIE (SIKJIT TI
(1f COHCOORAT1OH) POST-FllH:
$Met 3 of 14 IheelI
POINT EAST1NC NORTHINC 0100 FlOOO UHf (,IPPfiOXlllAT1OH --
20 )(-4.915$8.282 Y-7079176.861 VARIOUS n VAlUES) POST-flUNG
21 X-491~S.809 Y.707QI7!t704 Qloo FlOOO UHf (,IPPfiOXlllAT1OH
1225-19
22 X-491570.526 v- 707917tUI14 VARIOUS n V~UES) PRE-FllH:
2J X.49151’.9~ Y.707917S.8.’ dot. !SUI JJM[ lOll
Page 9
No. 55 Lake Macdonald Drive Cooroy Stage 2 Short Duration Culvert
Calculations for Access for Lots 5, 6, & 7.
Lot 7 Culvert: Catchment A (see Plan 1225-25).
Catchment Area A =
1.653 ha
Q 1 00 rainfall event FCIA =
1/360 x 0.94 x 155 x 1.653 0.67 m3/s
Cross Road culvert, 1 X 900x300 RCBC with outlet control.
Maximum HW =
103.475(upstream side of dwy) 102.875(RCBC invert)
- =
0.6m
ke 0.4, A
=
=
0.908 x 0.305 =
0.277 sqm, L =
4.88m
de =
0.467(QIB)2/3 =
0.467 X (0.51/0.9)2/3 =
0.32m
TW =
xsect DIS of2/A (see attached PCDrain Calculation sheet) =
0.232m
(de + 0)/2 =
(0.32 + 0.305)/2 =
0.313m
So ho is greater of 0.232 and 0.313 =
0.313m
HW =
H + ho -
LSo
0.6 =
H + 0.313 -
0.03
H =
0.317
From Figure 9A-5 DTMR Road Drainage Manual, Q =
0.51 m3/s
Q 1 00 weir flow =
Q 1 00 flow 0.67 m3Is -
0.51 m3Is piped
0.16 m3/s
Weir Q100 1.7LH3/2 B =
6m
0.16 1.7 x 6 x H312
H (0.16I (1.7 x 6)i/3
0.063m
Adopt weir capacity for a 0100 of 0.67 m3/s with 6m width, 0.063m upstream depth Hand
900x300 RCBC.
Note culvert more than adequate tor Q5 without overtopping as Q5 =
0.32 m3/s vs culvert
capacity of 0.51 m3Is.
Page 10
Lot 6 Culvert: Catchment A + B (see Plan 1225-25).
Catchment Area A =
1.755 ha
Q 1 00 rainfall event FCIA =
1/360 x 0.94 x 155 x 1.755 =
0.711 m3/s
Cross Road culvert, 1 X 900x300 RCBC with outlet control.
Maximum HW =
1 02.883(upstream side of dwy) -
1 02.364(RCBC invert) =
0.519m
ke=O.4, A =
0.908 x 0.305 =
0.277 sqm,L =
4.88m
de =
0.467(QlBi/3 =
OA67 X (OAI0.9i/3 =
0.272m
TW =
xsect D/S of2/C (see attached PCDrain Calculation sheet) = OA11m
(de + D)/2 =
(0.272+ 0.305)/2 =
0.288m
So ho is greater of 0.411 and 0.288 =
0.411m
HW =
H + ho -
LSo
0.519 =
H + 0.411 -
0.064
H =
0.172
From Figure 9A-5 DTMR Road Drainage Manual, Q =
OAO m3/s
Q 1 00 weir flow Q100 flow 0.711 m3/s -
0.40 m3/s piped
0.311 m3/s
Weir QIOO 1.7LH312 B =
3m
0.311 l.7 x 3 x H312
H (0.3111(1.7 x 3))2/3
0.155m
Adopt weir capacity for a 0100 of 0.711 m3/s with 3m width, 0.155m upstream depth H and
900x300 RCBC.
Note culvert more than adequate for Q5 without overtopping as Q5 =
0.34 m3/s vs culvert
capacity of 0.40 m3/s.
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progrcss\l225 30 lots lake MacDonald Drive\CorrespondencelStage 2 Correspondence\property access,
2
flooding calcs.doc
Page 11
Lot 5 Culvert: Catchment A + B (see Plan 1225-25).
Catchment Area A =
1.755 ha
Q 1 00 rainfall event FCIA =
1/360 x 0.94 x 155 x 1.755 0.711 m3/s
Cross Road culvert, 1 X 1200x300 RCBC with outlet control.
Maximum HW =
102.579(upstream side of dwy) -
102.1 04(RCBC invert) =
OA 75m
ke= OA, A =
1.212 x 0.305 =
0.370 sqm, L =
4.88m
de =
OA67(Q/Bi/3 =
OA67 X (OAll.2i/3 =
0.246m
TW =
xsect D/S of2/C (see attached PCDrain Calculation sheet) =
OAl1 m
(de + D)/2 =
(0.246+ 0.305)/2 =
0.276m
So 110 is greater ofOAl1 and 0.276 =
OAllm
HW =
H + 110 LSo
-
OA75 =
H + OAl1 -
0.069
H =
0.133
From Figure 9A-5 DTMR Road Drainage Manual, Q =
OA6 m3/s
Q 1 00 weir flow Q 1 00 flow 0.711 m3Is -
OA6 m3Is piped
0.251 m3/s
Weir QI00 1.7LH312 B =
4m
0.251 :::::
1.7 x 4 X .H312
H (0.251 I (1.7X 4))2/3
0.111m
Adopt weir capacity for a 0100 of 0.711 m3/s with 4m width, 0.111m upstream depth H and
900x300 RCBC.
Note culvert more than adequate for Q5 without overtopping as Q5 =
0.34 m3/s vs culvert
capacity of 0.46 m3/s.
X:VOBS\CT Projects in progress\l225 30 lots lake MacDonald Drive\Correspondence\Stage 2 Correspondence\property access,
3
flooding eales.doc
Page 12
APPENDIX A -
PCDRAIN CALCULATION FOR CULVERT
TAILWATER LEVELS
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\1225 30 lots lake MacDonald Drive\Correspondence\Stage 2 Correspondence\property access,
4
flooding cales.doc
Page 13
~
~ ii il! ~ DESIGN ARI
! :;; ;: STRUCTURE No.
{1; .-
~ ~
~
~f ~:;; ;-~
s. DRAIN SEmON
)0-
-<
5
:z
I -
Sill-CATCHMENTS
f; .
CONTRlBUTING
j lAND USE
..
)t SLOPE OF CATCHtolNT
SUB-CATCHI1ENT
n n
!!!.
’"
TIME OF CONe.
;::-~
"
9191 91 III ~ RAINFALL INTENSITY -
10yr RUNOFF ~~
~ CO-EFFICIENT
:r:
)0-
CO-EFFICEHT
~ ~~ H
OF RUNOfF
~~
:c
~
! I!I!
Il
,.,.
~ ii:" SUB-CATCHMENT AREA >",
z
-<
c::
~~
; ~~
in ~~ ii:" EQUIVALENT AREA ;.""
,.,.
U ~~ if SUI1 OF (C.A) ~
SUB-CATCHI1ENT
;II
!::~
;.~: ;;;- DISCHARGE
’"
K&C "FLOW IN
~ !:
~ !UNe. BYPASS)
s
~
~ .. ~ .. ROAD GRADE
,. :II .. ~
!: !:i AT INLET
.
MINOR FLOW
~ !;;;-- ROAD CAPAOTY
6
fjl
INlET TYPE
z:
!: $;;:- FLOW INTO INLET fZ’
....
’"
- - ~ BYPASS FLOW .,.
BYPASS
STRUCTIJRf No.
iI. CRlTICAL
ii ~~ ’"
TIME OF CONe.
ri
’"
~~ SISI ~ RAINFALL INTENSITY -
+
;:!ii
:1:_ g;g; if TOTALlC .
A) ~
)0-
’S :;;;- MAJOR TOTAL FLOW e
’:II.... MAJOR SURFACE FLOW <::>
’" ",
,-,
"’~ ’" >
J> CAPACITY z
r-
,-, <::>
c: !- ;;;: MAJOR SURFACE FLOW ",:;l
0-
J>
2 r ~
z
-I
is: ;;;- PIP~ FLOW
:z: t~ ~-
.g
VI
-I If ; REACH LENGTH
.. .-
J>
OJ
;0::
r- ~
rn
; ~~ PIPE GRADE on
:;: ~ ’"
’"
PIPE I BOX
’iI DIMENSIONS (CLASS)
ii
~~ d ~ (PIPE
FLOW mOaTY FULL
~
GRADE VELOCITY)
<
TIME OF FLOW
~ 5 ~. -<
~REACH
STRUCTURE
CHART No.
STRUCTURE RATIOS
FOR ’K’ VALUE
CALCltATIONS
~
,.
i i. mOOTY HEAD ~~
U/S HEADLOSS ",,0
Page 14
/.,
,
.
ABN: 39019550176
Hanley Signata Pty Ltd Uas TREE FIX
p: 212 Wappa Falls Rd
Yandina QLD 4561
e :[email protected]
m: 0439724013
Arboricultural Tree Appraisal and
Retention Proposal
ReportlD 2130610
Site Address: 55 Lake MacDonald Dr Cooroy
(formally)
Commissioned by: Lex Toth
Callaghan & Toth
Civil, Environmental & Hydraulic Engineers
8/41 Sunshine Beach Rd, NOOSA HEADS
Phone: 54749081
Date of inspection: Wednesday, 30, May 2013
Design Reference Drawing reference numbers
Callaghan & Toth
1225-01
1225-02
1225-03
1225-21
Prepared by: Scott Hanley
Dip HortlArboriculture, MAA, MQAA
Director I Principal Arborist
TREE FIX
Page 15
.
/.
..-
./
J
.
,.,
Table of Contents
1. Report Request Brief: ....................................................................................................
5
2. Inspection Methodology Breit: .....................................
..............................
.....................5
3. Visual Tree Assessment as per lot Number. ..................................................................
7
3.1. Lot 1. (Draft 1225-02 lot 17) .....................................................................................
7
3.2. Lot 2. (Draft 1225-02 lot 18) .................................................................................
..13
3.3. Lot 3. (Draft 1225-02 lot 19) ................................................................................
..17
3.4. Lot 4. (Draft 1225-02 lot 20) .............................................................................
....20
3.5. Lot 11. (Draft 1225-02 lot 11) ...............................................................................
..23
3.6. Open Space, Storm Water Line and Storm Water Bio Retention........... .................26
(Draft 1225-02 Parallel to Lot 4 and lot 11).......................................................................26
3.7. Lot 5. Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 5)................................................. ...........
....28
3.8. Lot 6. Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 6).. .............................................................
.30
3.9. Lot 7. Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 7)................................................................32
4. Tree Protection Management Proposal: .......................................................................
37
4.1. Site Induction & Awareness Briefings....... .........................................................
.....37
4.2. Tree ProtecUon Zone Marking, Fencing and Signage Needs .................................37
4.3. TPZ and SRZ calculations...... .......................................................
........................37
4.4. During Construction Access...................................................................................37
4.5. Vehicle & Machinery Working Under Trees....................... ..................................
...38
4.6. Mulching. .................................................
.....................................................
.........38
4.7. Tree Canopy Pruning............................................................................................. 38
4.8. Excavation management within TPZ......................................................................38
4.9. Ground/Root Protection .........................................................................................38
4.10. Root Protection...................................................................................................38
4.11. Modification of Soil Levels ...............................................................
..................
.38
4.12. Inspections.... ....................................................................
................................
.38
4.13. Post Construction...... .........................................................................
...............
.39
5. References:............................................................................... ..................................
39
6. Disclaimer: ...................................................................................................................
40
Appendix 1 ..........................................................................................................................
41
7. Visual Tree Assessment Criteria: ....................................................................................41
Id No.:...............................................................................................................................41
Species: ...........................................................................................................................41
Age class:.........................................................................................................................41
Tree F’x TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 3 of 49
Page 16
.
.Y
.1
1. REPORT REQUEST BRIEF:
This report has been commissioned by Lex Toth of Callaghan & Toth Civil, Environmental &
Hydraulic Engineers; engaging Tree Fix to assess trees on site and provide a tree appraisal
and suitability for retention proposal, regarding a number of trees identified as being within
the land development zones of Lot 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, 6, 7 (or as first identified in Draft Drawing
1225-01 Lot 17,18,19,20, and 32, 31, 30) and as to the following
1. Identify trees with poor structure and health within described development lots
Refer to sections 3.1 to 3]1
2. The suitability for retention of two large Norfolk pines close to rear boundary of lot
20/11, services and close to future houses
Refer to sections 3.4 to 3.5
3. Recommend tree removal or retention where trees are within the zone of influence of
driveways and services.
Refer to sections 3.1 to 3.61
4. Comment on the exotic trees within the site and as marked on the attached plan
drawing 1225-02
Refer to sections 3.1 to 3.6J
5. Development management plan for tree protection where required
Refer to sections 4 onwards
All information within this report is supplied without prejudice
Site Location and Details:
Location: Proposed 29 lot subdivision of 55 Lake Mac Donald Drive Cooroy
The weather at the time of the inspection was light breeze and cloudy, after rain period.
(See Appendix 4 for site overview.)
2. INSPECTION METHODOLOGY BREIF:
Equipment used:
Diameter tape: for measurements of tree stems at 1.4m from ground level.
. Camera: Nikon COOLPIX S3100 and used to capture primary images.
o Personal iphone 4 was also used to capture supporting images
Design reference drawings: where provided by by Lex Toth of Callaghan & Toth Civil,
Environmental & Hydraulic Engineers
Review of design plans and inspection of trees and locations was carried out on site 30-5-
2013 by Scott Hanley (TREE FIX). Scott Hanley holds an AQF Level 5 Diploma in
Tree Fix TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 5 of 49
Page 17
y’
i
.
3. VISUAL TREE ASSESSMENT AS PER LOT NUMBER.
Refer to Appendix 1 (section 7) ’Visual Tree Assessment Criteria’ for user explainer of
table elements if required.
The following tables under section 3, contain relevant information regarding trees
assessed on as per each allots site:
Lot 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, 6, 7 (or as first identified in Draft Drawing 1225-01 Lot 17, 18, 19, 20,
and 32, 31, 30)
3.1. Lot 1. (Draft 1225-02 lot 17)
---
---
~/--
0-r- ,<.,.
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 7 of 49
Page 18
.
y
Id No.
Location
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Camphora cinnamomum Camphor Laurel
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
Stem 1 - 43cm
20 years or greater 14m approx 4-6m approx
Stem 2 - 43cm
TPZ (m) SRZ (m)
Tree Protection Zones
6m radius approx 3m radius approx
Services and
drivewa
Footpath construction and installation of services within TPZ
s
GOOD: Despite some structural defects; Tree of typical shape and
Condition
form true to s ecies for location with ood vi our
LOW: Tree is part of a stand of trees. Potential removal of other
surrounding trees will expose this tree to weather and wind events
Suitability to retain that it may not tolerate without further structural development. Has
major asymmetric suppression of canopy development due to co-
dominate develo ment next to acacia
Would require considerable rectification to mitigate issues over time.
Comments
Ima es re resent the tree with lower cano then acacia
Recommendations REMOVE TREE not suitable as standalone tree
T<ee FIX TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 9 of 49
Page 19
..v
"
~.
~.. 1
.,
t~. J.’i,.
, ,.....
~ [l ’~’~
.
r’"
~ ;.
~~
.
’. ,’;:7
T!
{
"r
<;."’" .......
’.
..
.~
’.
..
Id No. Tree 3 (M0500/12)
Lot 1. (Draft 1225-02 lot 17 )55 Lake MacDonald Dr Cooroy
Location
Centre of lot
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Mangifera species Mango
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem base at 0.3 m
20 years or so 10-11 m approx 4-5m approx 47cm
TPZ (m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
5.6m radius approx 2.8 m radius approx
Services and
Future residential building location potentially within TPZ
drivewa s
GOOD: Tree of typical shape and form true to species for location
Condition
with ood vi our
LOW: Tree is a commercial fruit tree and not considered a significant
Suitability to retain species for retention. Considered as undesirable in environmentally
rotected lands.
Species is not protected under Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Comments
local Law No. 19 Protection of Ve etation
Recommendations REMOVE TREE1
Tree F:x TPMP2130610 Callaghar & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 11 of 49
Page 20
"
..
3.2. Lot 2. (Draft 1225-02 lot 18)
~
r-:>
’0-
o
______0
----:17
(
Tree F,x TPMP2130610 Callaghar. & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 13 of 49
Page 21
v
Id No.
Location
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Poinciana regia Poinciana
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem Diam at 0.3 m
40 years or greater 14m approx 4-6m approx 93cm
TPZ(m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
11.16m radius approx 5.6m radius approx
Services and Driveway, Footpath construction and installation of services
drivewa s within TPZ
FAIR: Tree not of typical shape and form of species for location with
Condition
FAIR vi our. Ma"or as mmetr of crown.
LOW: Tree is part of a stand of trees. Potential removal of other
Suitability to retain surrounding trees will expose this tree to weather and wind events
that it ma not tolerate without further structural develo ment.
Would require considerable rectification to mitigate structural issues
Comments over a very long period of time (greater then 15years). Images
re resent the tree’s 2 main stem leanin heavil over ara e
REMOVE TREE structure not suited to rectification or exposure as a
Recommendations
standalone tree
Tree FIX "T"pMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald D:we (oaroy Page 15 of 49
Page 22
3.3. Lot 3. (Draft 1225-02 lot 19)
LOT ~
~
\- -
~T19
~
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 17 of 49
Page 23
.
<</~ ,
,’t!-. ---JI....
, ....
~:-.
... .’
’... ~
.
"
~>;.
",
,;, ,~-
.
1- ~
. JI_~~:""
;!Io.
.
""-r CI
Id No. Tree 11. (X500/10)
Location Lot 3. (Draft 1225-02 lot 19 )55 Lake MacDonald Dr Cooroy
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Lagunaria patersonia Norfolk Island Hibiscus
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem base at 0.3 m
20 years or less 14-16m approx 5-6m approx 74cm
TPZ (m) SRZ (m)
Tree Protection Zones
6.0m radius approx 3.0m radius approx
Services and
On lot 3 and 4 boundary
drivewa s
GOOD: Tree of typical shape and form true to species for location
Condition
with ood vi our
LOW: Considered as an undesirable species to live with close to
Suitability to retain residential buildin s and activit areas.
Seed pods contain thousands of tiny hard bristle like hairs that are
Comments easily carried by wind and extremely irritating when in contact with
skin. Also known as the itch cow tree.
Recommendations REMOVE TREE and other tree in same row of same species,
Tree FIX TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Coarey Page 19 of 49
Page 24
Id No. Tree 12. (HP800/12)
Location Lot 4. (Draft 1225-02 lot 20 )55 Lake MacDonald Dr Coaroy
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Araucaria cunninghamii Hoop Pine
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem base at 0.3 m
Greater than 50
22-23m approx 5-8m approx 74cm
ears
TPZ(m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
8.88m radius approx 4.44m radius approx
Services and
On boundary of lot 3 and 4
drivewa s
GOOD: Despite defects, Tree is of typical shape and generally; form
Condition
true to s ecies for location with fair vi our
Suitability to retain LOW: Tree would require very large protection area
Hoop Pine is a Queensland native and a commercial timber that is
also endemic to the area of Cooroy. However large highly exposed
trees are less desirable close to new development sites.
While Araucaria species can tolerate areas of more frequent and
higher winds speeds; a fail safe for the species is to be able to shed
Comments
limbs in high wind speeds to reduce chance of the tree failing
completely.
Cooroy and local areas have been subjected to freak storm events
over the last 15 years and one such event in the last 3-4 years that
caused ma’or dama eta ve etation and throu hout the Coaro
Tree F x TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth lake MacDonald Drtve Coo ray Page 21 of 49
Page 25
3.5. Lot 11. (Draft 1225-02 lot 11)
tfl.. ’
r
",
,{’
.... :"’- (-,..
rJ,.
\ ~:,,~..,
’A_-~ ~.......
-’
........-’ ~.. ~
~....,..
L T
~ ~
//-r .-’\..-...,--\. "
-.
-
-_
).... -#’ f"~ L-..--~,.
~~t ~
I } ",
’:-
(’-’ .\
~
1
~/15
<)
._r’\....--, C ;.~(.
~~~~
{->
f’ .-puOO/12 (,~) (~ l
~
1
ff/18
\ ’.
’-t
\~_’
.
’to ~~ ~. "
I.. -
./
’-: t
.r r~"’) .....
I \~.
,
’-....",J""",A..I.J’.’f
>
.
~~..
’’-(
~-<’, ’~
"
-’\ L T
’-
A,\J>f\,K.- ( (’ ’
’~
I., j
’/ ~.../ .
~
\--l
-\
.(
-~
5
,
....
~J)
.IJ’Y LOT 20
,[ ’~
r
,
.
’Iff).
\
’~
~~ i .,
,
LOT 19 ~~
\ D~~, ’)
.~
/
Tree F x TPMP213061Q Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 23 of 49
[OCR of page images]
3.5. Lot 11. (Draft 1225-02 lot 11)
Page 26
Araucaria cunninghamii I Hoop Pine
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem base at 0.3 m
Greater than 50
22-23m approx 5-7m approx 73cm
years
TPZ (m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
8.88m radius approx 4.44m radius approx
Services and
On boundary of lot 11 to lot 4
driveways
FAIR to GOOD: Tree is of typical shape and generally; form true to
Condition
species for location with fair viqour
Suitability to retain LOW: Tree would require very large protection area
Hoop Pine is a Queensland native and a commercial timber that is
also endemic to the area of Cooroy. However large highly exposed
trees are less desirable close to new development sites.
While Araucaria species can tolerate areas of more frequent and
higher winds speeds; a fail safe for the species is to also be able to
shed limbs and reduce chance of the tree failing completely.
Cooroy has been subjected to freak storm events over the last 15
years and one such event in the last 3-4 years
that caused major
damage to vegetation and throughout the Cooroy community.
It is these local weather trends that would be of concern to the safety
of residential development around this tree.
There is also evidence of some minor limb failure, which is likely due
Comments
to high wind speed events in the past. Remaining limbs have over
developed by extension; likely as a response to past limb loss.
Fruit drop is also considered a hazard. Cones of the Hoop Pine are
hard and heavy for their cricket ball size. During their cone
development cycle, generall risk management under Hoop Pines, is
to close off and restrict access to cone drop zones, or installing
permanent catch nets for safety.
Considered as an undesirable species to live with close to (within
target zone of) residential buildings and or high activity areas.
The life span of Hoop pines has been recorded to be over 400 years
and reach heights to 60m. Such trees require very large areas to
factor in space requirements to support continued growth
development and also the well being of neighbourinq residence.
Under the current design proposal it is not recommended that this
Recommendations
tree is retained
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 25 of 49
Page 27
Storm water line
Id No. Tree 14 (PB500/8)
Open space and storm water Bio Retention. (Draft 1225-02 Parallel
Location to Lot 4 and lot 11 ) 55 Lake MacDonald Dr Cooroy property
boundar
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Melaleuca sp (salicina) Paper Bark
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
20 years or less 12m approx 2-3m approx 45cm
TPZ(m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
6m radius approx 3m radius approx
Services and Storm water runoff basin and storm water underground
drivewa s services construction within TPZ
Condition POOR: Structural failures and die back of tree section
Suitability to retain LOW: Tree with significant defect that cannot be rectified easily
Would require considerable rectification to mitigate issues over time.
Comments Images represent the tree with section die back in canopy and
numerous e icormic res onse rowth
Recommendations REMOVE TREE due to structural defects
Tree F x TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 2 of 49
Page 28
.
Id No. N/A
Location Lot 5 (Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 5)
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
TPZ(m) SRZ (m)
Tree Protection Zones
Services and
drivewa s
Condition
Suitability to retain
No trees identified to be within or near proposed driveway
Comments
construction that re uire rotection
Recommendations
Tree FIx TPMP2 ’30610 Callaghar & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 79 of 49
Page 29
.
.
Id No. Tree 15 (PB500/7)
Location Lot 6 (Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 6)
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Melaleuca sp (salicina) Paper Bark
Age Height (m) Crown Radius (m) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
30 years or more 12m approx 2-3m approx 45cm
TPZ(m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
6m radius approx 3m radius approx
Services and
Driveway construction within TPZ 3.75m from stem base
drivewa s
FAIR: Mature tree with some defects and reduced vigour compared
Condition
to s ecies in area
Suitability to retain Good: Any defects that can be managed and tolerable for use area
Driveway construction will require cut and fill to construct over existing drain
way. Excavation of 200mm is likely to be made within TPZ to form and lay
concrete driveway slab. Tree Fix will be required to supervise excavation
Comments
within TPZ and perform any root pruning and management to AS4970 as
required. Images represent the tree in relation to proposed driveway
construction. Refer to tree rotection Ian.
Recommendations Retain tree
Tree F l( TPMP213061 0 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Drove Cooroy Page 31 of 49
Page 30
..,
Id No. Tree 17(G500/14)
Location Lot 7 (Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 7)
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Eucalyptus grandis Flooded Gum
Age Height (m) Crown Radius em) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
30 years or more 25m approx 6m approx 40cm
TPZ(m) SRZ (m)
Tree Protection Zones
4.8 m radius approx 2.4m radius approx
Services and
Driveway construction within TPZ
drivewa s
GOOD: Tree is of generally the typical shape and generally; form
Condition
true to s ecies for location with ood vi our
Suitability to retain LOW: Centre of driveway construction
Comments Not possible for retention under proposed driveway construction
Recommendations REMOVE TREB
Tree FIx TPMP213061 0 Callag’lan & Toti" Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 33 of 49
Page 31
.
~~
Major upper
crown failure
Dead stem
section
Id No. Tree 19 (G600/16)
Location Lot 6 (Wilgee Court (Draft 1225-21 lot 6)
Assessor Scott Hanley Date: 30-5-2013
Genus I Species Common Name
Tree Identification
Eucalyptus grandis Flooded Gum
Crown Radius
Age Height (m) Stem Diam at 1.4 m
m)
40 years or more 25m approx 12 m approx 52cm
TPZ (m) SRZ(m)
Tree Protection Zones
7m radius approx 3.5 m radius approx
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Ca laghaf"l & Toth Lake MacDonald Drive Cooroy Page 35 of 49
Page 32
:)
"
4. TREE PROTECTION MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL:
The information within the tree protection plan gives details which are to be followed during
the development of the site. The tree protection plan refers to the Australian Standard, AS
4970 -
2009 Protection of trees on development sites, and to industry guidelines and best
practice.
The aim of the tree protection plan is to ensure that all trees identified for retention are
retained for longevity within reason of typical stability and healthy condition in location within
the new development construction site.
All tree that are to be retained on site will be monitored and managed to the following
guidelines and!
4.1. Site Induction & Awareness Briefings
TREE FIX is to liaise with a designated onsite foremen/supervisor from the construction
company to insure that the Tree Protection Plan is adhered to in Arborist absence from site.
The workers and respected contractors on the site are to be made aware of the Tree
Protection Plan by the main contractor prior to commencing works.
4.2. Tree Protection Zone Marking, Fencing and Signage Needs
Prior to any works commencing on the site the Tree Protection Fence (TPF), shall be
installed with appropriate listed materials or marked at as listed radius from trees between
chainage points, in the presence of TREE FIX in guided by the Australian Standard, AS 4970
-
2009 Protection of Trees on Development Sites. The location of the Line marking paint or
fence is to be agreed with TREE FIX and will follow guidelines as required set out in "Tree
Protection FencIng".
4.3. TPZ and SRZ calculations
All trees require a Tree Protection Zone has been determined by stem calculations. However
TREE FIX may designate encroachment zone as guided by AS4970 and or determine is
appropriate natural protections.
4.4. During Construction Access
Access to the TPZ is prohibited or restricted to those with permission. (permissions granted
to Liam Haynes). The site Project Arborist, TREE FIX is required to attend the site when
works are to be undertaken which may affect trees or the roots which are being protected by
the TPZ. TREE FIX shall oversee, advice and assist as and where required. Details of any
works carried out are to be recorded by TREE FIX and made available upon request.
Site Monitoring -
TREE FIX will carry out and record regular inspections of the site
incorporating the following to be added to the certification:
. The trees within the TPZ, and record any observation, e.g. Leaves becoming
discoloured if unseasonable, dieback in the canopy, splits in bark, etc.
. The TPZ fence to ensure that it remains in the correct position. If changes or defects
are noted these are to be recorded, the site foreman/ supervisor notified and the
changes or defects rectified as soon as possible.
. Impacts which may arise from construction.
.
Landscaping compliance with the TPZ.
.
Any rectification / remedial action which may be required at any stage is done so as
specified by TREE FIX.
Tree F-.x TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 3- of 49
Page 33
"I
4.13. Post Construction
A post construction Arborist Report or Certification of compliance is to be prepared by TREE
FIX on the retained trees. A Visual Tree Assessment will be carried out on each tree
detailing the trees condition and vigour, damage or disturbance which may have occurred
and remedial works undertaken.
After the final inspection Certification of Compliance shall be supplied along with any
monitoring or rectification documentation as required.
TREE FIX may at any time implement new or additional procedures as
may be required for
the site in the best interest of the trees and the development as a whole.
5. REFERENCES:
Australian Standards AS 4373 -
2007 Pruning of amenity trees.
AS 4970-2009 -
Protection of trees on development sites
Wild Plants of Greater Brisbane -
Queensland Museum
Mangroves to Mountains -
field guide to native plants of SE QLD
Evaluating Tree Defects -
A Field Guide by Ed Hayes, Second Edition
Body Language of Trees -
Research for Amenity Trees, Claus Mattheck
Sunshine Coast Council -
CALCULATION OF HAZARD RATING
Smiley E. Thomas, Nelda Matheny and Sharon Lilly April 2012. Tree Risk Assessment:
Levels of Assessment
Matheny Nelda and Jim Clark Feb 2009. Tree Risk Assessment: What we know (and What
we Don’t Know)
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Callaghar & Totn lake MacDonald DrIve Cooroy Page 39 of 49
Page 34
""
APPENDIX 1
7. VISUAL TREE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
Id No.:
Each tree is allocated an individual identification number to allow for easy identification and
reference.
Species:
Tree names / species abbreviated to the first three letters of the genus and species.
Tree species key:
Del reg Delonix regia (Poinciana)
Age class:
Approximate age stage, typical of each species, full description abbreviated to first letter of
age stage.
Y
.
Young: Early stage of growth, immature size
-
EM Early Mature: Tree not reached mature size
. -
. M -
Mature: Tree reached mature size
OM -
Over Mature: Tree has reached mature size and is starting to decline.
Condition:
The general health and condition of the tree: the assessment is based on trunk and crown
appearance.
G -
Good -
Tree with no defects or disorders which are notable. Tree at low
risk of failing with a low risk target e.g. park, open space or other trees
F -
Fair -
Tree with minor defects or disorders noted. Tree at a lower risk of
failing hitting a target e.g. park, path or garden
P -
Poor- Tree with major defects or disorders noted. Tree may be unsafe
and/or at a higher risk of failing hitting a high value target, e.g. property
Oead May be a good habitat tree for native fauna if reduced to safe height
-
and in a suitable location.
Suitability for Preservation:
This categorizes the suitability of the tree for preservation, considering the tree health,
structural condition, age, size, longevity, ability to adapt to new environments and aesthetics.
For trees in non-use areas (eg. Open space) where a range in tree quality is appropriate, all
trees may be considered suitable, except for invasive species.
Categories are:
Tree FIx TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 41 of 49
Page 35
~
."
The Risk Level Rating indicates the time frame in which specified works are to be completed
in.
All pruning to be in accordance with or guided by AS 4373 -
"Pruning of Amenity
Trees"
All below ground works that are within the specified TPZ-SRZ shall be supervised or
perform by an AQF level 5 Arborist.
Tree FIX TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth lake MacDonald Dnve Cooroy Page 43 of 49
Page 36
,
’-’
As specified in the AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, the tree
protection zone (TPZ)is the principal means of protecting trees on development site. The
TPZ is a combination of the root area and crown area requiring protection. This area should
be isolated from construction disturbance so that the tree can remain viable. The TPZ
incorporates the structural root zone (SRZ).
The radius of the TPZ is calculated for each tree by multiplying its DBH (Diameter at breast
height -
trunk diameter at 1.4m above ground) x 12
Example: .5 m DBH x 12 = 6m Tree protection zone (TPZ)
A TPZ should not be less than 2m or greater than 15m (unless crown protection is required).
7.1.2 SRZ
Structural root zone, as specified in AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites,
is the surface area of protection.required to maintain tree stability -
a larger area is required
to maintain a viable. It is only necessary to calculate the SRZ when major encroachment
into a TPZ is proposed.
An indicative SRZ radius can be determined from the trunk diameter 0 measured in metres
(above the root buttress) and applying the following formula:
0.42
(0x 50) x 0.64
RSRZ =
The SRZ for trees with a trunk diameter less than 0.15m will be 1.5m.
7.2 Tree Protection Fencing (TPF)
Once the TPZ measurements and construction requirements have been calculated for the
trees to be retained the alignment of the TPF may be determined. The TPF is required to be
installed in the presence of TREE FIX prior to any construction works commencing on the
site and for it to stay intact until completion of all works.
Any tree removal or pruning within the TPZ could be carried out prior to the TPF being
installed. These works are to be supervised and recorded by Consult Arborist Pty Ltd.
When specified in the Arborist Report the TPZ area will be mulched with com posted tree
wood chips to an approximate depth of 100mm prior to fence installation. An additional Plant
Health Care Program and/or temporary irrigation may also be specified.
The TPF is to be steel mesh panels (As detailed in AS4687-2007 Temporary fencing and
hoardings) and held in place with concrete feet, the nut and bolt holding the clamps are to be
tightened with a spanner to prevent the fence from being easily moved and secured to
restrict access to those with permission only. Shade cloth or something similar can be
attached to the fence to protect the area from airborne matter. Uneven ground and or
exposed sites may require additional staking to hold the fencing in place. Care is to be taken
when installing the additional bracing not to damage tree roots or hit underground services.
Where the use of steel mesh panels (As detailed in AS4687-2007 Temporary fencing and
hoardings) is deemed not suitable for the site, the TPF can be constructed from orange site
Tree F- x r PMP~130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDona’d Drive Cooroy Page 45 of 49
Page 37
"
-..
Fig 2: Sample TPZ fencing & sign location
TPZ Warning signs
Tree rlx 1PMP2130610 Callaghan & TaU- Lal<e Mac()ona d JrlVe l:ooroy Page 47 of 49
Page 38
.
....
APPENDIX 4 SITE OVERVIEW
\
\
\
\
,
~~-~’ 1,
7"1
vn
~Jll
...
3JE..Jl.’ ~1.5
~ LOI~
il"wll
I
IID-~ !It’t,.
lru-:J ~IIICQjIU IJI’JD(J IILll vltlr 11M 1
1Il1-0 I U II!OIlDG III",["JOIJ 11m llr.’lr 1\.’" I
1~ I U/l1lltttliU ar,[l!>(Il(M!Ii:1t.
I
II~ I/!E ~"ll’IFIE ~!r;t:;.S
Illi-:! [ ~.Ti..I-U( IlTll!l
11>>-=1 , ""....V -.:I LOUT ’I." I
im-".J iI8J:. ~... l.Ol UI
1J1\....:1 I
~’ ’PLII!IIJ ’II"
1111-’ ,
!DElt.r~fll.\
11b-’1 lPrtl"’lllIM."~ L.1’J!
Im--l !EP9T .61:’0 QII1U ’Il> ;’:11\;6
UIIt
!Il’!lD
R-.’Y=D "k ;g*litE ’Ill i(l11. J I ’.
-
Sf;!’!ttl.Rj CR.\’ii1’tS
il\t H’~ 1!~ MK NlIIi’i llf rill’ltll
FtGd ColIll oil’ii (!WIt! Ni Ifut r t.:
’-r-1II1 OOTID:OP’"~tI ’""’IE IIJ[lI 0:.0
_ ~~ .tII)lUk: [f IT.-ill ~o>J: ~~
D:M1Il ~:oo: . t~w. Rl.I(iJ,’ (;fit ’J
181 :~ IV m 11/0 ~TII
Ira :-<<1 hIIr -lEI< lK ’I!ru.i&m
JWrQr.-tr.1 lit.L.~mt(I!(J.’.i tliM1ml:lofi UIJIIWIT AHII ERO~JCtj CONTRt\.
!lol l~C;! iDDU.~.T
=-3T.- !alCo7fn:iI...t:wt"
tll .fn aII!m aWl ~
",,:u.rr-rtArI
I l-W ’!I( ~:i&1:.lI’lm4!Y.l IrN.I\ I~. I lilt:!!
uu t..u.’" EI-(’.IJiN(l ~"::M ’"tfA.,’li1J,l.;.. to.UI!J!;H.t.’4ltl: !l.0JILI(1
!PI ’.(Ie G _.;1 \lI’,g.’1Ii ~’r4. :i\lI. ; Cll’lt~CL 1L~lgOCi/’=_ to.l’l:L’
!W I-t. ,.=C"- iL..:t mull!l:lttl; ltER\1t;" LOCIITIONS
egex
_x :;oor)-.nClrlba.::x....a;r:ht
f911-{’" 1RIr"!l \W
FtGd I Clll
flII!rQ r,..1’t~
fA!Oiolli :CUI
I}ftJ~H"’W(
",..!!! ~" """R’c~~" T ""flp"" 11
am:............ I!f<:’ I "<I"""
C"""*.,Io7.t1..........
J1IIIQ t;:ee liD !8[[])OJ!! .m 1U I.Qi d:~JWIII[ 00’rt.:. ,__......11
.........~_.,..~e:
,r,(’IlII ~ PI.,Il:nl\ -, ~rt:lI ntr
VI: ..10’)l.!DI:Ie ,....ar.,ou Ie.
..,.~ MTln911~1 :It ou\XUt .(a’Ita:121v"-:o., tDi~
~’K~ i!III. J 1 \.II!> -
Hll’hlJ I \l\’i ~~.~~~I!1i’If.!’ ~~.iM1oJ’)
:.,J’I’II’Itt.G"n~L:nr..c:ll:;.
..rII’,., ~r ,
Tree FIX TPMP2130610 Callaghan & Toth Lake MacDonald Dnve Coorov Page 49 of 49
[OCR of page images]
APPENDIX 4 SITE OVERVIEW
7-82 Bd
ORS AMEN THE)
HON CONTROL,
Secrrmetanen Cortrts wad cng wt
te wcuererint
ones Saran ty Leanne
Searent Cones on Csranasen St
ore Sendra robe fe
omm pos horke wri per
yoni
bn teperrdihy 2 te
cates de bene res eke
‘SERVICE LOCATIONS
xt
Page 39
~ , " ’l
~ s
"", ’-IfIJS;noton Or ~
LEGEND: STAGED WORKS
"
~1’<> 8r:
Callaghan & Toth
:’Cr
Civil, Environmental &
~~~
811~Cl
STAGE 1 WORKS AREA -
OPW13/0417
Hydraulic Engineers
PO BOX 2305
~ I NOOSA HEADS 4567
~ I
~ STAGE 2 WORKS AREA I
8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
~
’l- ~
~<f’
-=- Phone 54749081, fox 54749041
www.colloghanondtoth.com.ou
C.)IIUtrJ.rs CZ
; ~ STAGE 3 & 4 FUTURE WORKS datum AHD OERIVED
~~ ,*,c, II PSIot 178243
<)) ~ Origin (8.M.) RL 108.138
1
. ~c;
N
~ ~
’.,
a.
o
LOT 3
II approved
SURVEYED BY
RP202304 MAX WATTERSION Ie ~1[S
PHONE 54 426 121
I
1 project
~
PROPOSED 3 LOT
a
J
~
’\. SUBOMS/ON AT 55 lE
1
,
MacDONALD DRIVE COOROY
r
r LOT 99
t
~ RP88 I 300
\ ’ll
,300m
~""",",IS+ (llOII
\
.~
...
.,.C’
t."".
[~~YlID ]
PLAN INDEX
1225-17
1225-18
A
A
SITE PLAN
ROADWORKS & LANDSCAPING LAYOUT PLAN
LOT 3
RPI13733
[~ PIAN
)
1225-19 B DETAIL PLAN 1 OF 2
1225-20 A DETAIL PLAN 2 OF 2
1225-21 DRIVEWAY LONGITUDINAL SECTIONS -
LOTS 5-7
1225-22 A TREE CLEARING PLAN LOT 136 on MCH978
1225-23 A STORMWATER DRAINAGE LAYOUT PLAN
1225-24 STORMWATER DRAINAGE CULVERT SECTIONS Parish of TEWANTIN
1225-25 CATCHMENT PLAN
1225-26 A WATER REnCULATION LAYOUT PLAN LOT 135 County of MARCH
1225-27 A SEWER LAYOUT PLAN 1 MCH978
SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
1225-28 SEWER LAYOUT PLAN 2
1225-29 SEWER LONGITUDINAL SECTION locality of lE MacDONALD
1225-30 A SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE
ROAD & DRAINAGE -
STANDARD DRAWINGS
o 10 20 JO .j() 50 10l0i... 100
MSC G-O 1 00 TREE PlANTlNG INCLUDING ROOT BARRIERS
IPWEAQ 0-0030 EXCAVATION, BEDDING & BACKfiLLING OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE PIPES scale
SC ~IS OfllCINAL DRAWlNC SC
SEQ R-050 RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
1:2000(A3) DO HOT SC rROIoI THIS DRAWlNC
SEQ R-065 CONCRETE STRIP FOOTPATH USE ONlY DlIIENSIONS PR(M)[O
SEQ R-l0l PUBLIC UTILlnES SERVICE CONDUIT SECTIONS
IPWEAQ R-0140 SUBSURfACE DRAINAGE
REVISIONS
IPWEAQ R-0160 WATER SERVICE CONDUITS
rellSan deto s dote
MRD 1174 CONSTRUCTION OF END STRUCTURES H= 150-600 A REVISED PlAN UST 08 13
MRD 1318 CONSTRUCTION OF BASES WITH RECESSES & APRONS
~
~
~
~ fiLES
WORKS BOUNDARY (STAGE 2)
~ --
~
~ SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
~ Sedimentation Controls shall comply with
.::s the requirements of,
"MANUAL FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT
FOR APPROVAL
CONTROL, MAROOCHY SHIRE COUNCIL"
egex
SERVICE LOCATIONS (MESC,2007) which can be accessed on the Sheet 1 of 14 sheets
Ihelstra It is the
Councils external internet site.
responsibility of the Foreman to drawing number
.. AUSTRALIA contact the relevant service authorities to
NOTE: ENERGEX LOCATIONS ARE APPROXlt.4ATE ONLY FROio!
NOTE: TELSTRA LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY FROM
TELSTRA PI.JVIS. LOCATIONS ARE TO BE CONfiRMED
ascertain the exact locolion of services prior
Works Standards refer to, 1225-17
ENERCEX PLANS. LOCATIONS ARE TO OE COHnRMCD PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PHONE DBYO ta construction. "Contract Standards for Erosion and
PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PHONE DBYO SERVICE LOCATIONS ON 1100 FOR DETAILS.
SERVICE LOCATIONS ON 1100 FOR DETAILS. Sediment Control on Construction Sites."
dote 15th JUNE 2013
Page 40
LEGEND: EXISTING SERVICES STREET TREE SPECIES LIST
Callaghan & Toth
!.I I
......LL
I,!.!.!.!.!,! !.! ,
-
.Ll.lL
( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ((
--
BOTIOM OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
EDGE OF BITUMEN
BUILDING
~ 06
LOT 1
~~ -==-
1
~~
.
.11
Civil, Environmental &
Hydraulic Engineers
8/41
PO BOX 2305
NOOSA HEADS 4567
Sunshine Beach Rood
Phone 54749081, Fox 54749041
www.callaghanandtolh.com.au
--
---
CENTRE LINE
RP173883 datum AHD DERIVED
’VVVVVVV’v’VVV’ CONCRETE
PSM 178243
D- DRAINAGE Origin (8.1.4.) RL 108.138
EASEMENT
approved
__r--~r-- FENCE SURVEYED BY
MAX WA11ERSION .t ASSOCIATES
----------
EDGE OF GRAVEL
PHONE 54 426 121
KERB & CHANNEL
’\/ ,,/
OVERHEAD POWER project
-s-SEWER 1/ PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBDMSION AT 55 lAKE
-\,/- WATER MAIN
N
(fj) MacDONAlD DRIVE COOROY
EXISTING WATER METER
II
. EXISTING WATER HYDRANT
Client
"
LOT 11
VMJ<EV PlY LID
title
ROADWORKS & lANDSCAPING
, LAYOUT PlAN
""
""
) C>
0’
LOT 136 on MCH978
LEGEND: PROPOSED SERVICES Parish of lEWANllN
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAQ STD DWG R-0050 N32 125mm County of MARCH
THICK WITH SL72 MESH (PROVIDE 75mm MINIMUM SUB-BASE SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
PAVEMENT UNDER CONCRETE IF SUBGRAOE CBR VALUE=<6)
Locality of LAKE MacDONALD
EXTENTS OF EXCAVATION. TOPSOIL MULCH 75mm THICK &
- (100" COVER BY ON MAINTENANCE). TOPSOIL, FERTILIZE &
/
TURF ROAD RESERVE & CUT BATIERS.
SCAlE
EXTENTS OF FILLING. TOPSOIL & MULCH 75mm THICK (100"
o 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 Wet... 25
COVER BY OFF MAINTENANCE). TOPSOIL, FERTIUSE & TURF ROAD
RESERVE AND FILL BAnER AT BOTIOM OF LOTS & DRIVEWAYS.
LOT 13
:6.. scale
1:500(AJ)
SCN.f SHOWN IS ORIGINAl. DRAWING SCN.f
00 NOT SCN.f FROII lHlS DRAWING
NEW INTERNAl/EXTERNAL FOOTPATH TO SEO ....
- R-065 REFER TO PLANS FOR WIDTHS
USE 0Hl.y DIIIENSIONS PftCWl!D
o PROPOSED SEWER & MANHOLIE
-[- PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRiCAl
’<.> REVISIONS
’M revision details
A
.
REVISED BATTERS AND 0100 LINE
date
08/13
-15011- PROPOSED WATER MAIN
......
\\~"
’.
FRC/RCP RRJ CLASS 2 "-"
".
~ PROPOSED RETAINING WAILL TO ’..._-------
DETAIL ON PLAN 1225-20
FILES
~ TREES TO BE REMOVED
REFER TO PLAN 1225-22
-QlOO-QlOO- 0100 FLOOD LINE (APPROXIMATE MAJOR FLOOD) FOR APPROVAL
-QlOO-QlOO- 0100 FLOOD LINE (SHORT TIME OF CONCENTRATION) /
/
Sheet 2 of 14 sheets
/
~~
.’.’. . . ": PROPOSED STREET TREE /
D
D
D
1225-18
drawing number
TOPSOIL, FERTIUSE AND TURF BAros ’"
I FOOTPATH
dote 15th JUNE 201 J
Page 41
DRIVEWAY SETOUT FOR LOTS 5 TO 7
LOT 0’-’---"
EDGE OF CONCRETE AT FINISHED LEVEL
Callaghan & Toth
Civil, Environmental &
~~
POINT EASTING NORTHING
Hydraulic Engineers
1 X= 491585.897 y= 7079187.763
PO BOX 2305
I
2 X=491581.696 y=7079189.530 NOOSA HEADS 4567
3 X=491574.249 y= 7079190.691
II 8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
-=- Phone 54749081. Fox 54749041
4 X=491574.711 y= 7079193.655 www.colloghonandtoth.com.au
5 X= 491582.521 y= 7079192.437 do um AHD DERIVED
6 X=491586.642 Y=7079190.703 PSI.I 1782043
7 X=491588.519 Y=7079195.274 Origin (8.M.) RL 108.138
8 X=491583.654 Y=7079197.321
9 X=491575.073 Y= 7079198.659 approved
10 X=491575.535 Y=7079201.623 SUR\IEYEO BY
11 X=491584.478 Y= 7079200.229
MAX WATTERSION & ~TES
PHONE 54 426 121
12 X=491589.683 Y= 7079198.040
13 X=491597.869 Y= 7079217.361
14 X=491593.076 Y=7079219.395 project
15 X=491569.805 Y= 7079223.023 PROPOSED 3 LOT
16 X=491570.267 Y= 7079225.987
SUBDMSION AT 55 LAKE
17 X-491593.905 Y= 7079222.302
18 X=491599.041 Y= 7079220.122
MacDONAlD DRIVE COOROY
NOTE:
ALL DRIVEWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO Client
STANDARD DRAWING IPWEAQ SEO R-050
& TO LONGITUDINAl PLAN 1225-21.
V f)/ PTY LTD
AlSO REFER TO DRIVEWAY SETOUT TABLE
FOR DETAILED SEITlNG OUT.
NOTE:
REFER TO PLAN 1225-23 FOR DETAILED
[""OCrAIL PIAN 1 Of 2
]
SETOUT OF STORMWATER PIPES &
f::::;~~~:~~f?+
STANDARD DRAWINGS LISTED ON PLAN
1225-17.
? LOT 136 on MCH978
MIN FFL 102.99
Parish of TEWANTIN
g lOT~ ); County of MARCH
SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
Locality of LAKE MacDONALD
SCAlE
1. 6. ...".. 1.
scale
LEGEND: PROPOSED SERVICES 1:25O(A3) SCAlE SHOWN IS ORIGINAl OAAWlNG SCAlE
00 NOT SCAlE fROII TltIS OAAWlNG
YIJIIj
\/\
\
REVISIONS
\./.
PROPOSED HOUSE SITE revision details dote
"
\
REVISED LOT LEVELS AND Q 1 00
\ /J ,/ A
B REVISED RTW AND flLL LE.VELS
08 13
08 1 J
"
’.’
APPROXIMATION OF
EXISTING FLOOD
\ PROPOSED TURNING
STUDY n = 0.15 ----...-
--------------
c~ PATH
POST-FlWNG
/~ ~
.~
PROPOSED RETAINING WAlL TO
DETAIL ON PLAN 1225-20
flLfS
PROPOSED FINISHED EARTHWORKS LEVEL
~
/ -Q1oo-QIDO-
0100 FLOOD LINE CURRENT STUDY
RETAINING WALL SETOUT FOR LOT 5 \) n=0.064 (APPROXIMATE MAJOR FLOOD) FOR APPROVAL
-0100-0100- 0100 FLOOD LINE (SHORT TIME
TOE OF WALL AT FOOTING LEVEL
OF CONCENTRATION) POST-FlWNG
Sheet 3 of 14 sheets
POINT EASTlNG NORTHING
010D FLOOD LINE (APPROXIMATION drawing number
20 X=491556.282 Y= 7079176.861
VARIOUS VALUES) POST-FILlLING
21 X=491565.809 Y=7079175.704
n
Q I 00 FLOOD LINE (APPROXIMATION
1225-19
22 X=491570.526 Y=7079176.914
VARIOUS n VALUES) PRE-FILLING
23 X=491571.956 Y=7079178.841
--- dote 15th JUNE 2013
Page 42
-- --
--
--
II Callaghan & Toth
--- Civil, Environmental &
~~
NOTE: Hydraulic Engineers
AlL DRIVEWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO
STANDARD DRAWING IPWEAQ SEQ R-050 ’"
TO LONGITUDINAl. PLAN 1225-21. AlSO
j
~
\ II 8/41
PO BOX 2305
NOOSA HEADS 4567
Sunshine Beoch Rood
Phone 54749081. Fo. 54749041
www.colloghonondtoth.com.ou
REFER TO DRIVEWAY SETOUT TABLE FOR datum AHD DERIVED
DETAILED SETTING OUT.
PSIoI 178243
Origin (8.1.1.) RL 108.138
NOTE: approved
SURVEYED BY
REFER TO PLAN 1225-23 FOR DETAILED MAX WATTERSION I: ASSOCIATES
SETOUT OF STORMWATER PIPES ’" PHONE 54 426 121
STANDARD DRAWINGS LISTED ON PLAN
1225-17.
project
PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBDMSION AT 55 LAKE
MacDONAlD DRIVE COOROY
Client
V EV PlY LTD
title
DETAIL PLAN 2 OF 2
\
LOT 136 on MCH978
\
\ Parish of TEWANTIN
\ County of MARCH
,
\ f// -b SUNSHINE COAST COUNCil
GEOFABRIC 1.5m LONG
\
" a
"
locality of LAKE MacDONAlD
""/.
" 0, 1/ \
SCAlE
o 1.25 .5 .75 5 6. 5 IIeItn 12.5
NATURAl. BACKFILL. LAY ANY FILL BEHIND WAlL IN
MAX. 200mm LAYERS TO 95% STANDARD COMPACTION. scale
SCI/..E SHOWN IS tlflIGINN.. DRAWING SC\U
NO LARGE MACHINERY TO BE USED NEAR WAlL. 1:250(A3) 00 NOT SCI/..E FROII TIfS DRAWING
USE ONlY DIoIENSIOHS PIlOWlED
C>
"v~’j
WAlL HEIGHTS REVISIONS
TO DETAIL PLANS
~ revision details dote
GEOTEXTILE TO BACK OF TIMBER ~<o’:’ A ADD RETAINING WAlL DETAIL 08 13
AND AROUND AG PIPE SCREENINGS ~"
FREE DRAINING BACKFILL
: \t g *’
.
,
H5 TREATED HARDWOOD WALES DURABILITY CLASS 1 OR 2.
/4 , ~ :
"
cb
o
N
,
200x50 WITH PLASTIC WEDGE BEHIND TO LOCK INTO I-BEAM :I:
100mm SLOTIED PIPE IN 10mm
SCREENINGS. DRAIN TO SW PIT.
y’;t\
.,
~
’H@Y
~
8
:I:
FILES
/^’"
~’.
:=.
.....\ .i
/’
’.
i
r .:’
... ~ \: " l00UCI4 POSTS HOT
::;
.
~
.. S’.
l’
DIP GAlVANIZED AFTER
RETAINING WALL DETAILS FOR APPROVAL
.:.f
~. .
~ ... ~ CUTIlNG TO LENGTH
.
~
.
.
WAlL HEIGHT PEIR DEPTH
1.. ,~~~, , ,
H D
POST TYPE WAlE TY WALE SPAN Sheet 4 of
drawing number
14 sheets
oO-.:Lo...
\ 100UC 14 200x50 HW 1200
0-600 600
1225-20
RETAINING WALL SECTION RETAINING WALL PLAN VIEW
dote 15th JUNE 2013
Page 43
START WORK CHO.000
END WORK CH12.385
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAQ STD DWG
R-0050 N32 125mm THICK WITH SL72 MESH
(PROVIDE 75mm MINIMUM SUB~BASE PAVEMENT
UNDER CONCRETE IF SUBGRADE CBR VALUE=<6)
r GRADE LINE
s0 &
mm» & &
Co
2a & &
8S Se 28
= Zee A Ss
a © ne i;
= av] Ss a
ss 2 &
e 8 53}| a
se wn
a + Zo ae 2
= : a :
. £og/s a
r GO SE So
6 Pel] Ss CL
2 -3/|" &
= xl] x
GSe/S a
— ©
TT NE |
r- NATURAL SURFACE
START WORK CH0.000
END WORK CH14.698
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAQ STD DWG
R-0050 N32 125mm THICK WITH SL72 MESH
(PROVIDE 75mm MINIMUM SUB-BASE PAVEMENT
UNDER CONCRETE IF SUBGRADE CBR VALUE=<6)
GRADE LINE
r NATURAL SURFACE
rs
Sg
3 2
3
2 2 = 2
= & mm
3 oa ™ g
a 2g Bt} B =
3.5 Sa| 2 i
ra sey a
at) (HE S>| <
ee 2a) * o
s Sel a a
o s go S
2 3 =
R = elo si
— 2 aw! 8
x : :
x & eg] = &
Go =
ao & xz] x a
a 5B) &
TTY | a
C
\
Horiz Curve Data
Vertical Geometry Grade (%)
Vertical Curve Length (m)
Vertical Curve Radius (m)
DATUM _R.L.100.000
12.467%
2.52%
-15.579%
NATURAL SURFACE
102.616
102.835
102.682
102.201
102.304
102.529
102.696
CUT / FILL DEPTH
0.224
0.275
-0.050
DESIGN LEVELS ON
ROAD CENTRELINE
702.656 [0.158
102.856 |-0.021
102.906
102.594 |-0.393
102.579
102.579
102.704 |-0.007
102.729
CHAINAGE
12
12.385
2
6
LONGITUDINAL SECTION LOT 5
NORTH SIDE DRIVEWAY
Horiz Curve Data
Vertical Geometry Grade (%)
Vertical Curve Length (m)
Vertical Curve Radius (m)
DATUM R.L.100.000
12.533%
2.48%
\%
e—
NATURAL SURFACE {S| | ®| 3| ®| &) 8] &
CUT / FILL DEPTH |x| | 8) &| 2) 2) 8) a
DESIGN LEVELS ON |g] g/ el | gl 8] &) se
ROAD CENTRELINE |S] 8) 8 3) si 8) si gg
CHAINAGE 5
LONGITUDINAL SECTION LOT 6
NORTH SIDE DRIVEWAY
DRIVEWAY
EDGE
Horiz Curve Data
Vertical Geometry Grade (%)
Vertical Curve Length (m)
Vertical Curve Radius (m)
DATUM R.L.100.000
START WORK CH0.000
IP CH. 4,000 RL.104.665
IP CH. 1.500 RL.104.603
1P CH. 5.579 RL.104.600
f
f
/ |
A_# oi
\
2.533%
2.48%
-4.117%
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAQ STD DWG
R-0050 N32 125mm THICK WITH SL72 MESH
(PROVIDE 75mm MINIMUM SUB~BASE PAVEMENT
UNDER CONCRETE IF SUBGRADE CBR VALUE=<6)
GRADE LINE
. 11.504 RL.104.220
1P CH. 23.504 RL.103.475
os
STORMWATER CULVERT CH20.504
“ CH. 17.504 RL.103.475
=
4
en
=6.h14%. |= 121417 Ya, )%o. A.
END WORK CH29.504
( Callaghan & Toth )
| Civil, Environmental &
Hydraulic Engineers
MI PO BOX 2305
i) NOOSA HEADS 4567
| 8/41 Sunshine Beach Road
Phone 54749081, Fox 54749041
www.callaghanandtoth.com.au
pemeet
designed ADT | dotum AHD DERIVED
crown_ a PSM 178243
checked | AH | Origin (B.M.) RL 108.138
approved
[ NATURAL SURFACE
IP CH. 29.504 RL.104.160
5
|
NN
os
SURVEYED BY
MAX WATTERSION & ASSOCIATES
PHONE 54 426 121
nd
project
PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBDMSION AT 55 LAKE
MacDONALD DRIVE COOROY
N ceeseeeeesinlenienasnninaesennsneenaaee
oY
Client
VALKEV PTY LTD
a
title
DRIVEWAY LONGITUDINAL
SECTIONS
Nene
ee ee
LOT 136 on MCH978
Parish of TEWANTIN
County of MARCH
SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
Locality of LAKE MacDONALD
N essnssnsssssnsasnssennsseenesnens”
(i
SCALE
o.2 4 6 8 10 20
eee
0 20 40 60 80 100 Meters 200
4 ‘SCALE SHOWN IS ORIGINAL DRAWING SCALE
1:400 VE DRAWING
RT
; 00 NOT SCALE FROM THS
1:4000 HORIZ Use ONY DMENSIONS PROVED
REVISIONS
FILES
ol al ola) ml =! ol ol else el ehor ol wi
Im) tl HK) Ol GF OPN NN mM RB] wt FS S| OS
s 3/3 5
NATURAL SURFACE J%/ 3] 2] 8) 3) 3) 2) Sie a) Se) a a Sls
=| 8 8 8 8] S| s/ 8) Sis 8S) si sis
wn] t| ml iol ol el os
CUT / FILL DEPTH fa] a] 8] S|} S] x] | S} RS] S|] GS] 8] &
Ss} 8) S| | S) S] €) 3} 3) 3) 3] S} Ss) a &
sl al 1 FT) cl ol ol TT) FF SLA ole
DESIGN LEVELS ON f¥}] ¥/ 8} & 4] ys] ge] e| S| 4) ee) Sl Sl Sig
3] | S} &) S| mR) FB) a) SS) S| 3) &) RB) aS
ROAD CENTRELINE || 2} 2| S| J] S| S| S| S| S| S| SS) S| Se
|
CHAINAGE | a
~ wl of SSS Visi Si Sis sia
COMPUTER DIRECTORY
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\1225 30 lots
lake MacDonald Drive\Design\Current DWG-BASE
LONGITUDINAL SECTION LOT 7 DRIVEWAY
NORTH SIDE DRIVEWAY EDGE
FOR APPROVAL
Sheet 5 of 14 sheets
drawing number
1225-21
KY date 15th JUNE 2013 S
Page 44
LEGEND: EXISTING SERVICES
Callaghan & Toth
BOnOM OF BANK Civil, Environmental &
~
--- - - - -
~~
!.!.!., , ,.,., I. I, !.,
176 Hyd",I;, Eog;,,,,,,
~~\
TOP OF BANK
PO BOX 2305
( (( ( ( , I (( ( I (
BUILDING ’. NOOSA HEADS 4567
.
I 8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
D- DRAINAGE -==- Phone 54749081, Fox 54749041
LOT I
www,colloghonondtalh,com,ou
EASEMENT RP173883 datum AHD DERIVED
FENCE II PSM 178243
Origin (8,M,) RL 108.138
----------
EDGE OF GRAVEL N
KERB & CHANNEL
II
-- - -
approved
,/ "
OVERHEAD POWER SURVEYED BY
WAX WAlTERSION &: ASSOCIATES
-s-SEWER PHONE 54 426 121
~TREElINE
--
’vi WATER MAIN project
r""" PROPOSED 3 LOT
TREES SEE TREE SPECIES TABLE BELOW
(
Q/oI]OOfl?
-
SUBOMSION AT 55 lAKE
(’\.."Vr> NOTE: LETTER REPRESENTS TREE TYPE
MacDONAlD DRIVE COOROY
FIRST No. IS TRUNK DIA (in mm)
SECOND No. IS TREE CANOPY DIA (in m)
Client
LOT 11
TREE SPECIES VNJ<EV PlY LID
TREE ABBREVIATION TREE NAME/SPECIES TYPE
A ASH
B
BA
BLOODWooD
BANKSIA
(~ ClEARING PWl
]
BB BOmE BRUSH
BX BOX
CD CADAGHI LOT 136 on MCH978
CI CITRUS LOT 12 C1’
Parish of TEWAN1lN
CL CAMPHOR LAUREL
County of MARCH
F FIG SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
G GUM Locality of lAKE MacDONAlD
GC GOLDEN CANE
HP HOOP PINE
SCALE
IB IRON BARK
o 2.5 5 7.5 10 12,5 Wet", 25
J JACARANDA
LOT 13 scale SC\lf SHOWN IS OR1G!No\l DRAWING SC\lf
LEP LEOPARD 1:5OO{A3) 00 HOT SCAlE FROM THIS DRAWING
USE ONLY IJtt.IEHSIONS Pft(M()[O
1M MAHOGANY
REVISIONS
MO MANGO
revision details dote
MP MAPLE
A REVISED FILL EXTENTS 08 13
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAQ STD DWG R-0050
N NATIVE
NJ2 125mm THICK WITH SL72 MESH (PROVIDE 75mm
MINIMUM SUB-BASE PAVE~ENT UNDER CONCRETE IF
P PALM
SUBGRADE CBR VALUE=<6)
PB PAPERBARK
o PROPOSED SEWER & MANHOLE
PI PINE
FILES
-&- FUTURE SEWER ALIGNMENT
PN PANDANAS
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL
PO POINCIANA
S STRINGYBARK
PROPOSED WATER MAIN
SC SCRUB FOR APPROVAL
SH SHE OAK FRC/RCP RRJ ClASS 2
6 of
~
Sheet 14 sheets
SI SILKY OAK
TREES TO BE REMOVED & MULCHED (MULCH TO BE drawing number
n TEA TREE SPREAD 75mm THICK OVER BUILDING PAD) WITH
ROOTS GRUBBED 1225-22
WL WADLE -s
-Iv’
X EXOTIC -0100- Q 1 00 FLOOD LINE (APPROXIMATE)
dote 15th JUNE 2013
Page 45
LEGEND: PROPOSED SERVICES
Callaghan & Toth
NEW STORMWATER RCBC
Civil, Environmental &
NEW SEWER -bcr
~~ Hydraulic Engineers
NEW EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER
LOT 1
~~-=-
.
I
PO BOX 2305
NOOSA HEADS 4567
8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
Phone 54749081, Fox 54749041
www.colloghonondtoth.com.ou
RP173883 dotum AHD DERIVED
II PSII 1782-43
Origin (B.M.) RL 108.138
N
" approved
SURVEYED BY
MAX WAlTERSION ct ~TES
PHONE 54 426 121
project
PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBOMSION AT 55 LAKE
t.tocDONALD DRIVE COOROY
Client
VNJ<EV PlY LTO
,
(;ORMWATER lAYOUT PlAN
]
~
LOT 136 on WCH978
~ ~
<:>
a-
Parish of lEWANTlN
~
County of MARCH
~ SUNSHINE COOT COUNCIL
Locality of lAKE MacDONALD
\ o
SCALE
2.5
scale
1:5OO(A3)
5 7.5 10 12.5 Wete
SC\I SHOWN IS ORIGIN ORAWlNC SCALE
00 NOT SC\I f’ROIj lHlS ORAWlNC
25
USE ONlY [)tIjENSlONS PROWlED
REVISIONS
/ re’iSon detoas dote
A REVISED 0100 08 13
NAME/COORD STRUCTURE CHAlNAC[ INVERT OFFSil PIPE
STR CTURE TYP[ RL CEN CRADE
9(0)(300 RC8C TO TYPICAL
I/A X=491579.304 20.504 102.815 2,44 0.5%
SECTION SHOWN ON PlAN
Y=7079225.530
1225-H. PIPE l=I.88m
fiLES
2/A X=491578.553 20.504 102.845 2.14
Y=7079220.708
9(0)(300 RC8C TO TYPICAL 8.121 102.35-1
1’/8 X=491580.078 SECTION SHOWN ON PlAN
2.14 1.3%
Y=7079193.nO
1225-24. PIPE l=l.88m
2/8 X=491580.826 8.121 102.300 2.14
FOR APPROVAL
Y=7079196.811
Sheet 7 of 14 sheets
12OOK3OO RC8C TO TYPICAL
I/C X=491580.078 1.091 /02./01 2.# 14% drawing number
SECTION SHOWN ON PLAN
Y=7079193.no
1225-2-1. PIPE l=4.88m
1225-23
-
2/C X=491579.326 1.091 102.035 2.14
Y=7079188.948
date 15th JUNE 2013
Page 46
Callaghan & Toth
1-1.2m-1 LENGTH -
See Pion Civil, Environmental &
PLAN VIEW I
N
E
.
.
Nominal Rock thickness is os specified
on the Layout Plan
Min. Depth of the Rock Pod sholl be
))~ ~~I
Hydraulic Engineers
PO BOX 2305
NOOSA HEADS 4567
6/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
-==- Phone 54749061, Fox 54749041
twice the nominol Rock thickness
www.colloghonondtoth.com.ou
designed ADT datum AHD DERIVED
drown 101101
PSM 178243
150x50 HARD WOOD checked AH Origin (S.M.) Rl 108.138
TIMBER(H4) EDGEING FASTENED
WITH 149X75 GALVlNIZED HEX filter Cloth
HEAD SELF DRILLING FASTNER approved
SECDON X-X
SURVEYED BY
STREET TREE 45 LITRE WAX WATTERSION &: ASSOCI,\TES
MULCH COVlER TO GARDEN BED PHONE 54 426 121
BAG SIZE AT PlANTING
150mm THICK
WITH CLEAR TRUNK.
50mm BELOW TOP OF KERB
(NATSPEC COMPLIANT) project
ELEVATION
PROPOSED 3 LOT
~ e SUBOMSION AT 55 LAKE
o
STAKE TREES AS PER (5
LANDSCAPING CODE, Z MacDONALD DRIVE COOROY
WITH 3 HARDWOOD
:J
IlL Outlet pipe Q 21J Jl
o
CD
STAKES. DRIVE INTO
r~I~R~R~ SOIL CLEAR OF
ROOTBALL OF TREE. TIE
IN A FIGURE 8 AROUND
TREE.
~
W
Q.
o
cr::
Q.
CULVERT Ounrr ROCK PROTECTION DETAIL
~
~
[:~ mLTD
)
FASTENING INTO TIMBER CLEATS
1:50 tille
ROOT GRAVlEL 900mm DEEP TO KERB EDGE STORMWATER DRAINAGE CULVERT
WATER CRYSTALS AS PER SLOW RELEASE FERTllISER AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS
MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS (AVOID
STREET TREE PLANTING DETAIL
PLACING UNDER ROOT BALL)
SCALE: N.T.S.
LEGEND: PROPOSED SERVICES
LOT 136 on MCH978
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO IPWEAO STD DWG R-0050 N32 125mm
THICK WITH Sl72 I.lESH (PROVIDE 75mm MINIMUM SUB-BASE Parish of TEWANTIN
PAVlEMENT UNDER CONCRETE IF SUBGRADE CBR VALUE=<6)
County of MARCH
SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
Locality of LAKE MacDONALD
SCALE
o 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 Wet", 2.5
scale SCALE SHOWN IS 0flIGINAI. DRAWING SCAlf
-
O.5m 3~ O~
1:5O(AJ) 00 HOT SCALE mow THIS DRAWING
USE CKY IlIIENSIONS PR<MOED
b
CD
/""
V
I
r PRECAST HEADWALL TO MRD
STANDARD DRAWING 1174 I ...
REVlSIONS
revision details
.
dote
0% TO -2.1% 0% TO -2.1% I
5%
,\~I II~..?~,
/1tutlet pipe
’. .
" I FILES
. .
"
-y,nN: )( .x y
’lY ))
~
^
I
~ ""’" BOX CUlII’’’ .
C/5f INSIIU
BASE TO MRD STANDARD DRAWING 1318 I Datum 102
FOR APPROVAL
Centreline R.L.l03.460
900x300 LOT 7 f-
900x300 LOT 6
1200x3DO LOT 5
TYPICAL STORMWATER
10SSING TO DRIVEWAYS
Sheet 8 of
drawing number
1225-24
14 sheets
.
dote 15th JUNE 2013
Page 47
Callaghan & Toth
Civil, Environmental &
~~
~
, 1 Hydraulic Engineers
PO BOX 2305
NOOSA HEADS 4567
~ ’
I 8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
...
-==- Phone 54749081. Fox 54749041
www.col1oghonondtoth.com.ou
~3’1
datum AHO OERlVED
II PSM 178243
Ori9in (8.M.) RL 108.138
~. N
II approved
SURVEYED BY
MAX WAllERSION .t ~1ES
PHONE 54 426 121
(
project
,
""
’"’ PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBOMSIO~ AT 55 lAKE
(J.~
MacDONAlD DRIVE COOROY
’::.
......
Crai"dge
Client
V ~ PTY LID
title
CATCHt.fENT PlAN
e>
LOT 136 on MCH978
Parish of TEWANllN
1
County of MARCH
....
p , SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
’D
locality of lAKE MocOONALD
-’"
~
SCALE
o 10 20 30 40 50 -. 100
scale
~ 1:2000(~)
SC\LE _ IS ORK:INAI. ORAWIHG SC\LE
DO NOT SC\LE F’ROII lIIS DRAW1HG
US[ MY OO f’R(MI)[I)
\
REVISIONS
revision details dote
... .
FILES
Ji
LEGEND FOR APPROVAL
....CATCHMENT AREA
Sheet 9 or 14 sheets
drawin9 number
? CATCHMENT ARfA
,"F.
A =1.65 Ha 1225-25
B = 0.10 Ho .
dot. 15th JUNE 2013
Page 48
LEGEND: WATER RETICULATION REFERENCE DRAWINGS
MWD 310 THRUST BLOCK DETAILS Callaghan & Toth
fiRE HYDRANT AND MARKERS
’0.,> MWD 320 HYDRANT & VALVE INSTALLATION
. Civil, Environmental &
TO STD DRC MWD 320 &I 365
~~~
MWD 355 STANDARD DOMESTIC WATER CONNECTION (NO SKEW CONDUITS PERMITIEO) Hydraulic Engineers
E APPROXIt.4ATE FUTURE ELECTRiCAl MWD 365 HYDRANT & VALVE MARKER INSTALLATION PO BOX 2305
PILI.J\R LOCATION
WAT 1201 EMBEDMENT & TRENCH FILL TYPICAL ARRANAGEMENT NooSA HEADS 4567
I 8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
WAT 1202 STANDARD EMBEDMENT ALL PIPES "
150\1 - NEW PV-O PNI6 SN10 150 OIA -==- ~ Phone 54749081, Fox 54749041
WATER MAIN www.calloghanandlolh.com.au
WATER SERVICE LOCATION TO datum AIlD DERMD
’W
STO ORG MWD 355
PSM 178243
NEW 100 DIA WATER CONDUIT Origin (8.M.) Rl 108.138
TO STD DRC 355
NEW ELECTRICAl CONDUIT
UNITYWATER TO DISCONNECT
o roved
TO STD DRC SEa R-l00 EXISTING WATERMAIN &I JOIN TO
SURVEYED BY
150 END WITH LONG GIBAULT
-----
E E -----
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND WAX WAlTERSION a: ASSOCIATES
POWER LOCATION PHONE 54 426 121
LOT 1
UELE EXISTING UNDERGROUND
POWER LOCATION
RP173883 II project
FILL FOOTPATH EDGE TO BOUNDAAY
N PROPOSED 3 LOT
SUBOMSION AT 55 LAKE
& TTER DOWN AT 1:3 TURF
ROAD RESERVE DISTURBED AREAS II MacDONAlD ORNE COOROY
~ Clienl
~
~
:;L V EV PlY LTD
\~
\\3- LOT 11
\ title
\
WATER RETlCULAllON LAYOUT
\ PlAN
\
\
, 17/ J LOT 136 on MCH978
WATER NOTES Parish of TEWANTlN
1. PIPE MATERIAlS County of MARCH
0) l00mm -
150mm (inclusive)-
SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL
To be constructed in:
LOT 12 0"
i) PVC-O PN16 SN10 AS/NZS~Hl (lnt) 1996,
-
locality of LAKE MacDONAlD
Series 2 PN 16 rubber ring joint;
b) 200mm &I ABOVE
i) DICL (AS22BO) closs PNJ5 rubber ring joint pipe polyethylene (AS3680) wrapped;
2. Ductile iron pipes and cost/ductile iron fitings sholl be wrapped toped and sealed completely in
SCAlE
accordance with Tubemakers of Australia Duct~e Iron Pipeline Design Manual Third edition -
1995.
3. Minimum for moins sholl be in occordonce with the following table,
cover
o 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 Weten 25
unless otherwise approved by the Water &I Sewerage Copital Works Manager.
Main Nom. Dio (mm) Cover Cover Cover scole SCIlE SHOWN IS ORIGIWL DRAWING SC\l.E
Access ways/Footpoths Sudivisianal Major Roods 00 NOT SC\l.E fROI4 TliIS DRAWING
1:5OO{A3) USE ONLY OI~ENSIONS PRO’IIOID
& Nature Strips Roods
1 00-200 600 1000 1200
250-375 750 1000 1200
REVISIONS
above 375 1000 1200 1200
LOT 13
4. Reticulation moins ore to Ioid at 1.5m off property alignment unless otherwise revision details dote
directed by the Water & Sewerage Copital Works Manager. A REMOVE Ql00 LINE 08/13
BEDDING 1:1,.,
5. In coostal sand terrain no special bedding is required. In 011 other soil lypes, sand LOT 5
bedding and surround sholl be washed 5mm screenings or River Sand. For 100-200mm pipe,
o minimun of loomm bedding and loomm of sand over lhe lop of the pipe is required.
THRUST BLOCKS
6. Suitably designed concrele thrust blocks 10 MWD 320 sholl be placed on 011 tees,
bends ond dead end cops. fiLES
HYDRANTS AND VAlVES
7. Fire hydranl spacing sholl be BOrn max. and located opposite properly boundaries
and adjocenl 10 011 dead ends.
8. Hydront valves to be in accordance wilh ASJ952-1991 for DN80 spring hydrants and sholl be
fusion bonded epoxy (FBE) or thermoplastic polyamide (Rilsan Nylon 11) coated.
All fasleners ore to be 316 stainless steel.
Hydrant valves to be in accordance with Unity Water standard. FOR APPROVAL
WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS
1,. Water connections to be in occordonce with Unity Water slandard drawings SCW350, 355 &I 360.
12. Bross plaques (marked "W") ore 10 be ploced in lhe kerb where conduits cross the kerb. Sheet lOaf 14 sheets
13. Water services’ connections to be located on allemate building lines to SEOEB meter boxes.
drawing number
WORK ON EXISTING MAINS
1225-26
14. All cut-ins and other works on existing mains to be performed by Unity Water and
actual cost including plant, Iobour and materials to be met by the developer.
dole 15th JUNE 2013
The text continues on page 49.
Used in these records
Response to information request REC13/0095Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 46.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.