Council archive · source document
Response to information request REC13/0095
Very large file (46.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
SSM
’
"
Your Reference:
Our Reference: 2013-08
Brisbane Stonnwater Management Pty Ltd
ACN 094 878 734 ABN 75 094 878 734
92 Alkoomie Street, Wynnum Nth, Qld
PO Box 8119, Wynnum Nth, Q 4178
Date: 6 Sept 2013 Ph 07 33963383 Fax 07 39010285
Email: [email protected]
Callaghan & Toth
POBox 2305,Noosa Heads, Q4567
Attn: Mr Lex Toth
Dear Sir,
Re: Proposed 3 Lot Subdivision At 55 Lake MacDonald Drive, Cooroy
In response to your emailed request of 16 August 2013,I offer
my advice in relation to Items 3 and 5 of
SeRC’s 24 July 2013 request for further infonnation about the above proposal; namely-
3 Provide an amendedplan which accurately represents the regionalflood extent on site (Council
flood extent mapping indicates thatpart ofLot 5 is within inundation extents).
5 Provide additional information (or an updatedflood study) which demonstrates the roughness
(manning’s)assumptions adopted in the originalflood study allow for revegetation ofthe main
drainage line. Alternatively provide a sensitivity analysis ofincreased roughness assumptions and
amendflood level extents and lot layout as necessary
The 100 Year Flood Boundary For The Existing Floodplain Condition
Lawson & Treloar Pty Ltd (L&T)undertook a flood study ofthe creeks in the Cooroy area for Council
in July 2002.I understand that some parts ofthat study have recently been updated for Council
by other
consultants, but the updated parts do not include the tributary alongside the proposed subdivision.
Accordingly, I have fonnulated my following advice on the basis that the 2002 L&T flood study is the
latest available study of flood levels in the subject area.
The schematic on the following page of this letter illustrates the floodway / subdivision scenario. One
ofL&T’s model cross-sections abuts the upstream boundary of Lot 5, and that lot extends about 35
percent of the floodway distance between that cross-section and the next downstream cross-section. I
understand that L&T’s predictions of the 100 year flqod levels at those two cross-sections, for their
assessment ofthe existing Manning’s n values, are respectively 101.79 m AHD and 100.62 m AHD,a<;
marked in the last row of data in the schematic. I therefore infer that the 100
year flood level at the
upstream boundary of Lot 5 for the existing floodway condition is 101.79 m AHD,and by arbitrarily
proportioning 35 percent ofthe level differential between the upstream and downstream cross-sections,
B5M Doc File 5SLkMacD RFLDoc
Page 1
_
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to information request REC13/0095Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 46.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.