Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request - Received on 19/04/2012 · OPW11/0335
Very large file (89.8 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 2, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Butler Partners Ply LId
ABN 14 8’~ 5 4 866
79 Doggett Street
Newstead, Queensland 4006
P.O. Box 2267
Fortitude Valley BC
Queensland 4006
Project No. 007-160A www.butlerpartners.com.au
Ph: 61 7 3852 3800
12 July 2010 Fx: 61 7 3852 3808
[email protected]
Matrix Pty Ltd
PO Box 3220
LOGANHOLME OLD 4129
Email: [email protected]
Attention: Mr C Sloan
Dear Clint
RE: ACID SULFATE SOILS
ESSENCE OF PEREGIAN
215 - 219 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Butler Partners has carried out an Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS)assessment at the site and the results of the
assessment are detailed in the following report:
Acid Sulfate Soil Assessment
Residential Development
215 -
219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
Project No: 07160 Dated: 18 June 2007
The ASS assessment comprised the drilling and sampling of six bores with samples taken for laboratory
testing. The subsurface conditions encountered in the bores generally comprised a surface layer of either fill
material, that varied up to a maximum depth of 0.8m, or silty sand to a maximum depth of O.4m. In two
bores drilled in the lower lying, western part of the site, the fill was underlain by natural, dark grey-brown silty
clays that were underlain in turn by silty sands that were indurated below 2m depth. In the eastern part of
the site, where the majority of the development is understood to be proposed, the surface fill or silty sand
layer was underlain by sands.
The results of the laboratory testing indicated that, in general, the fill material and natural sands and silty
sands were not ASS. The natural silty clays indicated levels of actual acidity below laboratory reporting
limits, with one exception from a bore at the western edge of the proposed development area. The silty
clays were therefore considered to include an apparently limited amount of ASS, potentially at isolated
locations.
W;&~
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
~
Member F rm
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request - Received on 19/04/2012Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 89.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.