Council archive · source document
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published] · MCU23/0078
d) Further justification in terms of specific citations and data to support the proportion
of visitor expenditure directed to retail noting that a review of National Visitor Survey
data indicates lower rates than those adopted by Deep End Services;
e) Provision of a more detailed assessment of appropriate retail floorspace and
supermarket floorspace provision benchmarks for the proposed development noting
the trade area is likely to have more in common with the Sunshine Coast rather than
Queensland as a whole;
f) Review development approval and application information for centres identified
within Deep End Services Table 7, noting that it appears to have omitted the
approved expansion of the full line Coles at Peregian Springs Shopping Centre;
g) Extend the assessment of traditional retail floorspace and supermarket floorspace
need beyond a catchment or trade area wide assessment to consider the appropriate
quantum of any notional floorspace supply shortfalls at a catchment or trade area
wide level that should be accommodated within the Noosa Business Centre (in other
words demonstrate a site specific need to accommodate future floorspace);
h) Consider the prospect that retail expenditure leakage in secondary catchments to
the south and west might be higher than in the other trade areas because of their
proximity to other centres and their respective roles in the catchment of tother centre;
i) Report the sales performance of Noosa Civic in particular the sales performance of
the Woolworths full line supermarket and Big W discount department store and
consider this performance against appropriate trading benchmarks;
j) Provide a more detailed market share analysis for the proposed development
including separate market share analysis for the proposed supermarket (that forms
the basis for Table 10 in the Deep End Services report) to facilitate validation of the
impact assessment contained at Table 12 of the Deep End Services report;
k) Address the potential ‘alternative sites’ issue associated with the 6,500 sqm of
remaining capacity within the Retail precinct of Noosa Business Centre noting that
approval of the proposed development does not necessarily extinguish the ability for
a further 6,500 sqm to be delivered within the Retail precinct of Noosa Business
Centre; and
l) Amend the assessment of ongoing employment impacts of the proposed
development to consider the potential loss of employment at other centres (or
redistribution of employment retail demand) as a result of the proposed
development.
Issue – Traffic Impact Assessment
A review of the Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) prepared by SLR, dated May 2023, has
identified several areas where additional information is required to assess the application.
Further information:
43. Section 8 (Operational Assessment) of the TIA is to be updated to take account of the
following factors:
Page 17 of 21
Document Set ID: 22464338
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/07/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 187 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.