Council archive · source document
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published] · MCU23/0078
order to achieve the Waterway stability design objectives is supported. Consideration should
be given to whether detention for events beyond the 63%AEP is required based on analysis
of the drainage channel in Covenant J and further downstream system.
Information Required
39. Provide an updated SWMP and stormwater detention analysis which addresses the
following:
• Clarify whether rainfall intensities have been increased to account for the effects of
climate change at year 2100, and if not provide a revised analysis for the 1%AEP
which includes allowance for climate change.
• Consider whether detention for events greater than the 63%AEP are required based
on the analysis of the capacity of the drainage channel in Covenant J on Lot 1 and
the drainage network further downstream.
Issue – Stormwater Quality
The proposed use of an underground proprietary system for achieving the required pollutant
load reduction targets does not meet the requirements of PO7 of the Water Quality and
Drainage Code, which requires the use of natural systems and process to enhance landscape
and biodiversity benefits, or PO3 of the Sustainable Building Design Code.
Information Required
40. Provide a revised SWMP and design drawings which achieve compliance with PO7 of
the Water Quality and Drainage Code and PO3 of the Sustainable Building Design
Code.
Issue – Water efficiency and stormwater reuse
PO2 of the Sustainable Building Design Code requires rainwater collection and reuse for non-
potable uses. This does not appear to have been addressed.
Information Required
41. Provide updated plans and a SWMP which incorporates rainwater/roofwater collection
and reuse at the site, sufficient to supply external non-potable fixtures such as landscape
irrigation and bin washdown and internal non-potable fixtures such as toilet flushing.
Specialist Reports
Issue – Economic Impact Assessment
A review of the Economic Impact Assessment prepared by Deep End Services has identified
several areas where additional information is required to assess the application.
Further information:
42. The following further information is required with respect to the EIA:
a) A needs assessment for the proposed cinema and indoor recreation components of
the development;
b) Update the demographic analysis such that the trade areas are benchmarked to the
Sunshine Coast SA4 (as opposed to Sunshine Coast LGA) and Queensland (and
also possibly SEQ);
c) Update the centres network assessment to reflect approved centre expansions and
note where there might be applications for centre developments or expansion within
the trade areas;
Page 16 of 21
Document Set ID: 22464338
Version: 2, Version Date: 17/07/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Information Request MCU23 0078 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 187 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.