Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Information Request Response Report (absent appendices)
Noosa Civic Expansion
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
5 Hydrology
5.1 Water Quality
“The layout and quantum of bio-basins need to be confirmed via a refined MUSIC model that
reflects the site layout, rather than the broad simplified approach taken in the SWP.
Information Required:
50 Revised MUSIC modelling to demonstrate the proposed stormwater quality
objectives can be achieved for the proposed development layout. In particular, the
following needs to be addressed:
(a) Catchment Set-up - The MUSIC model has used 1 catchment only whereas the
developed scenario will have several catchments draining to a least 4 different
areas.
(b) Rainfall Set-up - The MUSIC model does not appear to have used the Cooroy
Composite Station
(c) 40059 for the model (i.e. 1973 -1983) as stated in the report and as per the
guidelines. The model should be revised to incorporate this station.
(d) Bioretention Basins: As the basins will be used for flood attenuation, the basins
should be checked to ensure velocities are kept below the Water By Design’s
“WSUD Technical Design Guidelines for SEQ” Velocities should be in the range
of 0.5m/s for minor floods (2-10yr ARI) & 2.0m/s for Major Floods (50-100yr ARI)
+ plus risk assessment of erosion potential.”
RESPONSE
The MUSIC model for the proposed development has been updated to reflect a multiple outlet
configuration, as requested. Please refer to Appendix E – Stormwater Management Plan for
details. Rainfall data has been confirmed as being consistent with the reporting and guidelines.
Cardno advises that bio-retention basins are not at risk of erosion from flooding because they
are not being used for flood attenuation. Car park bio-retention basins are being used for ponding
only and will not have direct in-flows. Consequently adverse velocities are not expected in these
areas.
5.2 Water Quality
“The submitted MUSIC model does not appear to consider the impacts of waters from
catchments F1, G1 and H on the overall stormwater quality.
Information Required:
51 Demonstrate how waters from these catchments will be considered in the MUSIC
model and consistent with the proposed design.”
RESPONSE
Please refer to Appendix E – Stormwater Management Plan in response to Item 51.
Cardno advises that the small amounts of additional roads and hardstand within catchments F1
and G1 will be treated by the vegetated corridor for treatment in the corridor vegetation.
Catchment H will ultimately be developed and include its own treatment measures. Until that
occurs, the only developed portion of the catchment will be road runoff, drained to the bio-basin
proposed in the centre of the roundabout. An interim diversion bund will direct the runoff from
catchment H past the proposed bio-basin.
June 2015 Cardno HRP 31
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.