FINAL-Letter-170822-BA4480 Change Application - Minor Change - Responsib... · MCU16/0084.03

Stormwater360 system to treat any contaminated runoff continually before discharge to the
stormwater drainage, it is considered that the canopy over the fuel dispensing area should not need to
overhang the Fuel Dispensing Area (FDA) by one-quarter of the overall height of the canopy. The
purpose of this requirement is to minimise the volume stormwater runoff from entering the FDA when
discharging to a blind sump to ensure that the containment vessel is not full in the event of a fuel spill.
With the use of a Stormwater360 system, this is not a concern.
Based on the above, we therefore request condition 62 to be deleted. We note that Condition 28
endorses the use of a Stormwater360 system as follows:
        Condition 28: Any proprietary stormwater quality improvement product must be:
        a. designed and installed in accordance with its relevant Technical Design Guide;
        b. incorporate adequate high flow bypass for peak flows that exceed the design capacity of the
        system;
        c. include energy dissipation to prevent resuspension of accumulated sediment;
        d. include for activation of any necessary components following key rainfall events for the
        device (i.e. for Stormwater 360, the design must include for activation of the siphon following a
        5mm rainfall event over the catchment area.




Consideration has been given to the relevant matters for assessing a minor change in the PAct,
having regard to the definition of minor change in Schedule 2 and the assessment criteria in Section
81.

Schedule 2 Assessment Criteria
Schedule 2 of the PAct, outlines the definition of a minor change for a development approval (see
below).
The proposed change, as outlined above, have been assessed against these criteria, as follows:
Schedule 2 - minor change means a change that—
        (a) for a development application—
                 (i) does not result in substantially different development; and
                 (ii) if the application, including the change, were made when the change is made—
                 would not cause—
                         (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
                         (B) referral to a referral agency if there were no referral agencies for the
                             development application; or
                         (C) referral to extra referral agencies; or
                         (D) a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to,
                             matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters



                                                                                                          3