FINAL-Letter-170822-BA4480 Change Application - Minor Change - Responsib... · MCU16/0084.03

                             the referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have
                             had regard to, when the application was made; or
                         (E) public notification if public notification was not required for the
                             development application; or
        (b) for a development approval—
                (i) would not result in substantially different development; and
                (ii) if a development application for the development, including the change,
                were made when the change application is made would not cause—
                         (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
                         (B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there
                             were no referral agencies for the development application; or
                         (C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive;
                             or
                         (D) a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard
                             to, matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than
                             matters the referral agency must have assessed the application
                             against, or have had regard to, when the application was made; or
                         (E) public notification if public notification was not required for the
                             development application.
The proposed change as outlined above has been assessed against these criteria, as follows:
The response to (b)(i) of the above definition is:
In respect to Schedule 2 (b)(i) of PAct of what constitutes a substantially different development, it is
appropriate to have regard to the Development Assessment Rules, Schedule 1, for further information
about the substantially different development. An assessment of the proposed changes against the
substantially different development criteria in the Development Assessment Rules is included in the
table below.

 Guideline Criteria                                  Response

 Involves a new use                                  The proposed change does not alter the uses
                                                     approved. The proposed change involves the
                                                     deletion of Condition 62 to reflect the provision of
                                                     a Stormwater360 system instead of a
                                                     containment vessel (i.e. blind sump) for
                                                     managing contaminated stormwater runoff.

                                                     No new uses are introduced and the changes do
                                                     not involve any different or additional impacts
                                                     which were not addressed by the Applicant and
                                                     Council through the assessment process for the
                                                     original application.



                                                                                                        4