Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU25 0053 · MCU25/0053

of 19

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

               scale consistent with the intended character of the Medium Density Residential Zone. The front
               façade, boundary fence, pedestrian entry and driveway are integrated within a landscaped
               forecourt and additional planting forward of the fence line, contributing to a softened interface with
               the public realm.
               The architectural treatment of the façade, combined with the landscaped setback, introduces
               individualised design elements that enhance visual interest and positively contribute to the
               streetscape character. The proposal satisfies Performance Outcome PO14 of the Medium Density
               Residential Zone Code by ensuring that building bulk and scale are appropriately managed, and
               that the development integrates well with its surrounding context.
               Acceptable Outcome AO22.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code states:




               The proposal involves excavation to a depth of approximately 3.8m to facilitate the basement level
               of the dwelling house and as such the development does not comply with AO14.5 of the Medium
               Density Residential Zone Code. The proposal is therefore required to comply with the
               corresponding Performance Outcome PO14 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code,
               which states:




               Assessment
               The basement is proposed to be excavated without the need for retaining walls at the side
               boundaries. The basement is located immediately under the proposed dwelling house and the
               ground level around the perimeter of the site beyond the footprint of the dwelling house will remain
               relatively undisturbed and will be suitably landscaped. Where existing landscaping is removed as
               a part of construction, replanting will be facilitated to the boundaries of the site to maintain a high-
               level of landscape amenity to adjoining residents and street frontages.
               To ensure the proposed amount of cut does not lead to erosion, SCG have prepared civil drawings
               including bulk earthworks and have submitted a Dewatering Management Plan and Geotechnical
               Report.
               4.     CONSULTATION
               4.1. Referral Agencies
               Not Applicable
               4.2. Internal Council Referrals
               The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment:
               •      Senior Development Engineer, Development Assessment

               Refer to the Senior Development Engineer’s Internal Memo in ECM for further information
               regarding their assessment of this combined application, including the recommended conditions.

                                                                                                       Page 10 of 19

Document Set ID: 24261132
Version: 12, Version Date: 26/11/2025

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU25 0053.pdf · 3.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.