Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

05. Hales - Planning Report

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.

of 43

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

PROJECT URBAN – 20153                                                                                 13 Jul 2020


 Performance Criteria                Acceptable Solution                            Comments
     stated desired materials
     or colours.

 Performance Criteria                Acceptable Solution                            Comments
 Lighting
 5.1 Lighting, other than an         The lighting for the prescribed tidal work,    Not applicable.
 aid to navigation, for              other than an aid to navigation, is
 prescribed tidal work is            consistent with the following standards:-      No lighting is proposed other
 installed in a way to ensure        a) subject to paragraph (c), lighting for      than that required for safe
 the security and safe use of            prescribed tidal work is hooded and        navigation.
 the work without causing                directed downwards;
 significant adverse effects         b) subject to paragraph (c), each lighting
 on the amenity of the                   standard, to the extent relevant;
 locality within which the           c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
 work is located.                        is more stringent than the standard
                                         mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) – the
                                         relevant planning scheme standard, to
                                         the extent the standard is more
                                         stringent than the standard mentioned
                                         in paragraph (a) or (b);
                                     d) any other relevant planning scheme
                                         standard that is not inconsistent with
                                         the standards mentioned paragraphs
                                         (a) to (c).

 Performance Criteria                Acceptable Solution                            Comments
 Signage
 6.1    A sign erected or            A sign erected or otherwise placed in          Not applicable.
 otherwise placed in position        position for prescribed tidal work, other
 for prescribed tidal work,          than a sign erected or placed for safety       No signage is proposed as part
 other than a sign erected or        reasons, is consistent with the following:-    of this application.
 placed for safety reasons or        a) subject to paragraph (c), a sign erected
 under an Act:-                          or placed in position for identifying
 a) is compatible with the               prescribed tidal work, or the owner of
     character and amenity               the work, is the only sign erected or
     of the work’s immediate             placed in position for identifying the
     surroundings and the                work or owner;
     locality within which the       b) subject to paragraph (c), a sign erected
     work is located; and                or otherwise placed in position for
 b) is not a dominant                    prescribed tidal work is integrated into
     feature of the work,                the design and construction of the
     unless the dominance is             work;
     for safety reasons.             c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                         is more stringent than the standard
                                         mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
                                         relevant planning scheme standard, to


Development Assessment Report                                                                         Page 16 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
Log in to download the original file

05. Hales - Planning Report.pdf · 2.3 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.