Original source · versioned page text
05. Hales - Planning Report
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.
PROJECT URBAN – 20153 13 Jul 2020
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
stated desired materials
or colours.
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Lighting
5.1 Lighting, other than an The lighting for the prescribed tidal work, Not applicable.
aid to navigation, for other than an aid to navigation, is
prescribed tidal work is consistent with the following standards:- No lighting is proposed other
installed in a way to ensure a) subject to paragraph (c), lighting for than that required for safe
the security and safe use of prescribed tidal work is hooded and navigation.
the work without causing directed downwards;
significant adverse effects b) subject to paragraph (c), each lighting
on the amenity of the standard, to the extent relevant;
locality within which the c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
work is located. is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) – the
relevant planning scheme standard, to
the extent the standard is more
stringent than the standard mentioned
in paragraph (a) or (b);
d) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with
the standards mentioned paragraphs
(a) to (c).
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Signage
6.1 A sign erected or A sign erected or otherwise placed in Not applicable.
otherwise placed in position position for prescribed tidal work, other
for prescribed tidal work, than a sign erected or placed for safety No signage is proposed as part
other than a sign erected or reasons, is consistent with the following:- of this application.
placed for safety reasons or a) subject to paragraph (c), a sign erected
under an Act:- or placed in position for identifying
a) is compatible with the prescribed tidal work, or the owner of
character and amenity the work, is the only sign erected or
of the work’s immediate placed in position for identifying the
surroundings and the work or owner;
locality within which the b) subject to paragraph (c), a sign erected
work is located; and or otherwise placed in position for
b) is not a dominant prescribed tidal work is integrated into
feature of the work, the design and construction of the
unless the dominance is work;
for safety reasons. c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
relevant planning scheme standard, to
Development Assessment Report Page 16 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.