Development Application Part 2 - Environmental & Stormwater Management Plans · OPW11/0335

SUNSHINE COAST
                                                                                                           URBANC0NSU L T A N T S
21 September 2011
Job Ref: M2358
Contact: Leanne Simpson


The Chief Executive Officer
Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Locked Bag 72
SUNSHINE COAST MC QLD 4560


Att: Kerri Coyle


Re: Request for Pre-Request Response Notice under s368 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 - Development
Permit for Material Change of Use (Visitor Accommodation Type 4 - Conventional, Commercial Business Type 1
- Office, Retail Business Type 2 - Shop and Salon and Entertainment and Dining Business Type 1- Food and
Beverages) approved by the Planning and Environment Court (Appeal No. 2587 of 2008) over land at 215-219
David Low Way, Pereglan Beach and formerly described as Lots 8-10 on P9315 and Lot 76 on MCH2969 (now
Lot 77 on SP231615)


 Dear Kerri,


We refer to the above development approval issued by the Planning and Environment Court on 12 February 2010
 (refer Appendix A) and subsequent "generally in accordance" advice from Council dated 7 July 2010 (refer Town
 Planning Appraisal at Appendix B). Further to discussions between yourself and the applicant, we hereby make
application for a pre-request response notice in relation to a proposed permissible change in accordance with
s368 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA).


In summary, our client is seeking to split the development into three stages, as well as make some minor
amendments to the commercial building layout. A number of consequential amendments to conditions are also
proposed. A detailed description of the proposed changes is provided in the discussion below:


Description of Development


As part of the "generally in accordance" request dated 24 May 2010 and subsequently approved by Council on 7
July 2010, the Office use within the commercial building was substantially reduced in size and relocated to
provide a more logical and accessible reception/administration area. Under the current proposed amendments,
the area of Office has been further reduced and reconfigured such that we argue it is entirely ancillary to the
visitor accommodation and does not require separate definition under the description of development.


We therefore request that the "Commercial Business Type 1 - Office" component be removed from the
description of the development as it forms a minor and ancillary part of the development for the sole
administration of the visitor accommodation and it is unable to be separately tenanted. We note that staff
carparking for the visitor accommodation in proposed Stage 1 is provided under the carparking requirements for
Visitor Accommodation.




        ^•           nN1+CANt                                           1' N`11 NI I OACT                                  : f'CTNAI it VLEN.; AND



if


                      $P URBAN CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ABN 19050 41.1 Q45   MEMBERSHIPS. UUTA PCA PIA. UDAL SSSI RPLCG AIL..   WFBSITF W.SW IFPCOM. AS
To