Council archive · source document
08/0531 - Op Works - Dam [As Published] · 142008.531
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.1, 3 March 2008
ASSOCIATED WITH RECONFIGURING A LOT; RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. INA WILD RIVER.
AREA sare
4.2 |\s any of the proposed operational work associated with reconfiguring alot and the reconfiguration i is also assessable?
KQNo-Gotas3 =] Yes
Hf yes, is any part of the premises in a wild river area dectared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
(1 No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the locat government.
Yes
If yes, is the proposed operational work for residential, commerciat or industrial purposes outside a designated urban area,
as defined by the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
o No - (Complete Form 1, Part ) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the local government.
[1 Yes (Complete Form 1, Part E} The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the focal government, and subject to the
declaration for the relevant wild river area, assessment by the focal government is required for the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2005.
IPA scheguis 8. part 1, table 4, temn 2:1P Regutalan. schedule |. part 2, table § item 7c); Wit Rivers code (Nole: the code does not currently coniast applicable provisions Jor resxierition,
anke frat or contmessiel davehipment inside & designatad urban arad)
VEGETATION ‘CLEARING; KOALA CONSERVATION; WILD RIVERAREA _.
4.3 | Is any of the proposed operational work for the clearing of native vegetation to which the Vegetation Management Act 1999 chew
GRINo-Gotoass L] Yes
It yes, is the proposed clearing assessable (i.e. not an exception) under schedule 8, part 1, table 4 of the IPA?
No-Gotoass (Yes
oh
If yes, is the proposed vegetation clearing a relevant purpose under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, section 22A
for one or more of the following?
i) A project t declared to be a signifi icant project under the State Development and Public Works '[}No :(] Yes |
| __ Organisation Act 1971, section 26
: Necessary to ‘control non-native plants or declared pest
To ensure public sa safety ee ee,
For “establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or vehicle track, or for constructing
necessary built infrastructure, if there is no suitable altemative site for the fence, firebreak, |
road, track or infrastructure se _ . '
iW) A natural and ordinary consequence of other assessable development for which a ‘C]No Yes |
i development approval as defined under the Planning Act was given, or a development .
application as defined under the Planning Act was made, before 16 May 2003
-(vi)_ For fodder harvesting
Evil) For th thinning ee ee
: (viii) For clearing of encroachment
‘ (ix) For an extractive industy _
{x) For ‘clearing regrowth on leases issued under th the Land Act 1994 for agriculture or grazing ON No 'Llyes | Yes |
purposes '
For clearing regrowth on freehold la land, Of indigenous land, in a wild river high preservation [CINo (C1 Yes
eh ee
If no to all (i) — (xi) above - The clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse fo receive the application.
if yes to any one of (i) - (xi) above, is the proposed clearing associated with a material change of use or reconfiguring a
lot for which referral is required in relation to clearing vegetation (ie. did you answer ‘yes' to all questions in either Q2.1.4 or Q 3.3)?
1 Yes - Goto. 04.4
(No - Answer (a) (b) and (c) on the next page of this Checklist.
" Page 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0531 - Op Works - Dam [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.