Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Rpt-Proposed Lots 17 - 19, 28 Eenie Creek Rd, Noosaville_FINAL_

Attached to the e-mail Email with amended da form and planning report.msg.

of 76

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

    6.3.4 State Development Assessment Provisions
As the proposed development requires referral to SARA, the State Development Assessment Provisions
(SDAP) are applicable. An assessment of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) indicates
that the development needs to be assessed against the following State Codes:

•    State Code 6: Protection of state transport networks.
An assessment of the proposed development against State Code 6 has been provided as part of the Traffic
Engineering Report included as Appendix K.
Further, section 1.3 of the State Development Assessment Provisions v2.5 states the following:
          “Referrals to entities other than the chief executive are not administered by SARA and do not require
          assessment against the SDAP.”
The State Development Assessment Provisions are not required for the referral to Energex as the advice
agency for electricity infrastructure matters.




URBIS
RPT-PROPOSED LOTS 17 - 19, 28 EENIE CREEK RD, NOOSAVILLE_FINAL                       STATE PLANNING FRAMEWORK   29
Log in to download the original file

Rpt-Proposed Lots 17 - 19, 28 Eenie Creek Rd, Noosaville_FINAL_.pdf · 6.3 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.