Original source · versioned page text
2015-01-12 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 January 2015
16 COMMUNITY GRANTS REVIEW
DOCUMENT IN FOR MATI ON
Author Community Development Coordinator, Alison Hamblin
Community Services Department
Index ECM / Subject / Branch Management Community Services Section
Attachments 1. Community Grants Policy
2. Community Grants framework and criteria
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Community Development Coordinator to the General
Committee Meeting dated 12th January 2015 and:
A. Repeal the existing Community Grants Policy and adopt the revised Community Grants
Policy (Attachment 1);
B. Repeal the exising Communtiy Grants Framework and Criteria and adopt the revised
Community Grants Framework and Criteria (Attachment 2); and
C. Delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the development of a Festive Season Strategy.
REPORT
In April 2014 the new Noosa Council adopted a Noosa Community Grants Policy. Since then
there have been two rounds of the Noosa Community Grants program. Following the second
round of these grants Cr Wellington and Council officers undertook an internal review of the
Community Grants program to ensure that it was meeting its stated objectives and to identify
areas for improvement.
Overall the review found that the grants program has been well received by community groups
and is acting as a strategic investment tool to build community infrastructure and social capital
and enhance community skills, resilience as well as helping meet Council’s vision and priorities.
The strategy of Council officers encouraging and assisting community organisations to identify
external funding where available, rather than having these groups simply rely on Council funding
was also deemed to be successful. Furthermore there were a number of instances where Council
financial assistance had been used to leverage funding from other sources.
The review highlighted a number of areas for improvement including:
• Greater transparency;
• The potential to improve equity by capping the maximum amount of funding to particular
grant programs;
• Clearer definitions of eligibility;
• The small number of economic development application;
• The potential to improve the application form to better reflect the type of information that
Council was seeking from applicants; and
• Potential administrative efficiencies through multi year funding agreements.
Page 133 of 147
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.