Original source · versioned page text
2016-03-01 Infrastructure and Services Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (11.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 1 MARCH 2016
Page 21 of 81
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 1 MARCH 2016
woodland drive to get to corner of David Low | the new footpaths and pathways that are to be
Way, their is no pram ramp or footpath on the | provided. The comments provided by the
corner of Rufous Street and Woodland Drive | submitter have been noted and have been
adjacent to the Telstra lots on corner, for anyone | addressed.
in a wheelchair or on a scooter affecting people
who are disabled and the elderly.
Given the significance of the Master Plan area, | The Master Planning process has been open and
the Peregian Beach Village and the nature and | transparent with consultation extending to
scale of the adjoining and approved Peregian | community groups, the local traders association,
Village Market development, it is submitted that | property owners, developers and the general
there is greater opportunity for Council to | public. During this process the provision of
provide for improved, slow speed, vehicle | vehicular and pedestrian access has been
connections between the Master Plan area and | carefully considered.
the Peregian Village Market site. The provision
of vehicle connections between these two key | While there is support for pedestrian access to
development sites would provide for an | be provided through the Peregian Beach Village
additional and alternative access point from | Market site, potentially in two locations, there is
David Low Way into both sites, which in turn will | little support to provide vehicular access from
help reduced potential traffic impacts at the | the end of Rufous Street.
corner of David Low Way and Woodland Drive,
which were highlighted at the recent community | It is noted that Rufous Lane forms part of the
workshop held on 30 January 2016. land, which is a reserve for recreation purposes
and is owned by the State. While Council is
Extending vehicle connections between the two | trustee for the land it is not road reserve and
sites will also provide an important link between | vehicular access across this land cannot be
the proposed IT Hub within the Master Plan Area | achieved.
and the approved Peregian Beach Village Market
development, which is now under construction. | A key factor with the Master Plan is to ensure
Appropriately designed and controlled vehicle | that the existing intersection at Woodland Drive
connections between these two sites is | and David Low Way is not compromised.
considered essential to the overall connection of | Council’s Traffic Consultant has confirmed that
the Master Plan area, the adjoining site and the | the intersection can function properly with
broader Peregian Beach Village. expected traffic flows, which are not excessive.
Some works might be undertaken to improve
Council should use Stage 2 to connect Rufous | the intersection, but this does not include a
Street on the southern side to give local access | roundabout.
through to the Peregian Village Market
development, via a ‘shared zone’ for pedestrians
and vehicles.
In terms of access being provided to the | It is agreed that additional traffic in Rufous
Peregian Beach Village Market land, any | Street, other than that generated by the current
increased through traffic in Rufous Street would | Master Plan is not desirable. If access was to be
also have a significant impact on Woodland | allowed, the increased traffic from the Peregian
Drive and the David Low intersection, which | Beach Village Market and the ultimate
would be detrimental to residents in that pocket. | development on the remaining portion of the
land could adversely impact upon the operation
of the intersection. Further, the additional traffic
Page 21 of 81See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.