Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

DF13075_Bell Allen_Permissible Change Request_251016

Attached to the e-mail Change to approval and extension to the relevant period (1 of 2)MCU13/0247.02.

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Based on a review of the Detached House Code, it is noted that it is necessary to demonstrate that the
proposed roof terrace will not create opportunities for residents to overlook the private open space of
neighbouring properties. In this respect, it is relevant to note the following:

        •   the roof terrace is setback approximately 5.5m from the rear edge of the roof;
        •   the terrace is setback at least 3.84m from the side boundaries;
        •   the roof terrace will be enclosed by a roof garden;
        •   the sections show that the proposed terrace will sit above the height of the gutters on
            both of the adjoining properties;
        •   the private open space areas on the adjoining sites are located at the rear of both
            properties and are orientated to take advantage of the sea views; and
        •   the applicant is aware that a similar roof terrace design has previously been developed as
            26 McAnally Street.

Overall, given the design and location of the proposed terrace it is considered that it will not create
opportunities for residents to overlook the private open space areas on the adjoining sites and as such,
will not have adverse impact on their amenity.

REQUESTED CHANGES TO DECISION NOTICE
The changes that need to be made to the Decision Notice as a result of the amended design are listed
below. Where changes are proposed to the Decision Notice, any suggested new words are
highlighted in bold, while any words to be deleted are shown as struck out.

Section 3 of the Decision Notice advises that the relevant period of the approval is in accordance with
the

Condition 2 – Approved Plans
The list of approved drawings needs to be replaced with the following:

      Drawing Description                              Drawing           Rev         Drawing
                                                       No.                           Date
      Proposed Ground Floor Level                      5456 A-01         30          21.09.16
                 st
      Proposed 1 Floor Street Entry Level              5456 A-02         29          26.09.16
                 st
      Proposed 1 Floor Plan                            5456 A-03         22          26.09.16
      Proposed Roof & Site Plan                        5456 A-04         12          29.09.16
      Proposed Front Elevation                         5456 A-05         14          25.05.15
      Proposed RHS (South) Elevation                   5456 A-06         16          23.09.16
      Proposed Rear (East) Elevation                   5456 A-07         16          23.09.16
      Proposed LHS (North) Elevation                   5456 A-08         16          23.09.16
      Section A-A                                      5456 A-10         25          23.09.16
      Section B-B                                      5456 A-11         28          23.09.16
      Section D                                        5456 A-13         13          16.09.16
      Proposed Site Plan                               5456 A-30         03          12.09.16

Condition 16
The wording of the condition needs to be updated to reflect the new revision of the relevant plan.

        “The roof must not extend seaward of a line drawn between the closest roof corner of the
         adjoining properties to the north and south as annotated by Council on the approved plan
         plan A-02 revision 14 29”.

Condition 17
As the roof line of the proposed building does not extend as far east as the original design, it is
suggested that condition 17 be amended slightly to ensure that the privacy screens on the first floor
level continue to protect the amenity of the adjoining properties. In this respect, it is suggested the
condition be amended to rea as follows:

        “The privacy screens located on the 1 first floor seaward deck must not extend beyond
Log in to download the original file

DF13075_Bell Allen_Permissible Change Request_251016.pdf · 123 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.