Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

DF13075_Bell Allen_Permissible Change Request_251016

Attached to the e-mail Change to approval and extension to the relevant period (1 of 2)MCU13/0247.02.

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

       •   Introduces new impacts or increases the severity of known impacts.

           Comment:
       The proposal will not alter the existing impacts that the development will have on surrounding
       area.

       •   Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced the negative impact
           of the development.

           Comment:
       The approved development did not include an incentive of offset component.

       •   Impacts on infrastructure provision from a location or demand.

           Comment:
       The revised design will not result in any additional impacts on the local infrastructure
       networks.

       (b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change—
                (i)    require referral to additional concurrence agencies;

           Comment:
           There were no referral agencies for the original application and a review of the Sustainable
           Planning Regulations 2009, has identified that if this application were re-made under the
           “applicable law” with, or without, the proposed changes, no referrals would be triggered

               or

               (ii)    for an approval for assessable development that previously did not
                       require impact assessment—require impact assessment; or

               Comment:
           The changes do not change the original level of assessment for the application which was
           code assessable.

       (c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact
           assessment—be likely, in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to make
           a properly made submission objecting to the proposed change, if the circumstances
           allowed; or

              Comment:
           Not applicable as the previous application was code assessable.

       (d) cause development to which the approval relates to include any prohibited
           development.

               Comment:
            The proposed amendments do not involve prohibited development.

(2) For deciding whether a change is a permissible change under subsection (1)(b) or (d), the
    planning instruments or law in force at the time the request for the change was made apply
    (the applicable law).

               Comment:
       The current approval was assessed against the Noosa Plan 2006 and this document is
       still in effect.
Log in to download the original file

DF13075_Bell Allen_Permissible Change Request_251016.pdf · 123 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.