Council archive · source document
Development Application part 2 Report/Plans - MCU11/0254
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (41.8 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Original PDF page 27, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions Proposal
linkages with Precinct OS4; The proposed development provides
AND strong visual linkages with Precinct OS4.
O161 Development has strong Complies
pedestrian and bikeway connectivity Pedestrian and bicycle pathways
with Precincts B1, E1 and E2; currently exist to the frontage of the
AND site.
O162 Vehicular parking is provided on Complies
site; Vehicular parking is provided on site.
AND
O163 Development is staged, Complies
consistent with development in Precincts The development staging is appropriate
E1 and E2; as the site has been created as
‗development ready‘ under the primary
AND reconfiguring a lot approval.
O164 Development is compatible with Complies
and does not adversely impact upon the The proposed development, which
open space function of the adjoining achieves appropriate building setbacks
Precinct OS4. and includes landscaping treatments
throughout, will not have any adverse
impact upon the adjoining open space
precinct (OS4).
Streetscape and visual amenity S165.1 Front and side elevations are Complies
O165 Buildings and other structures— designed to avoid blank imposing walls The proposed development achieves an
a) present a visual bulk and architectural and bulky development forms by— articulated and visually attractive
scale that is consistent with structures a) providing vertical articulation at architectural design.
on adjoining and nearby land; minimum 5m intervals, at a minimum Both front and side elevations achieve
b) define, rather than dominate, the depth of 1m, through features such as articulation at 5m intervals through the
streetscape or surrounding public and stepped wall alignments, doorways, inclusion of hooded windows, steps in
private spaces; windows, covered entries and verandas; wall alignments, varied colour
c) provide variation in building and treatments, doorways, and covered
alignments by b) for 2 storey buildings, emphasising entries.
staggering or separating continuous the floor levels in the front elevation Floor levels of the 2 storey units are
walls into smaller sections to vary the through decks, balconies and stepping distinguished. Units are 1 storey at the
elevation, create visual interest, and back storeys progressively from the front and 2 storeys at the rear.
relieve building bulk; street by at least 1.5m for any additional
d) incorporate well articulated building storey above ground level;
forms with strong vertical design AND
features which interrupt the line and S165.2 Development takes the form of Complies/Alternative solution
plane, including windows, pergolas, sun small separate buildings (i.e. no more The proposed development is designed
shade devices, and variations in balcony than 4 attached dwelling units), rather as 4 separate building blocks and which
styles; than large single, bulky developments; takes the form of small separate
e) address all street frontages; AND buildings. While the proposal includes
f) vary and break up the roof form; more than 4 dwelling units in a row,
g) present subtle changes in colours, regard must be had to the fact the units
textures and materials to break up the are small dwelling units of less than 5m
building facades; and in width per unit. 2 – 3 of the proposed
h) integrate landscaping into the small dwelling units would typically
building design and car parking areas to comprise the width of a single
provide visual relief and screening. conventional unit. Block B is the largest
of the blocks and has been designed
with its length running along a side
boundary which minimises building bulk
to the street frontage. The proposed
unit blocks are articulated with strong
horizontal and vertical design features
and screened though substantial
streetscape landscaping provision.
When considering the sites context
within the Noosa Business Centre and
surrounding built from, the proposed
development is considerably small scale
in comparison and will result in an
appropriate streetscape outcome.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 2 Report/Plans - MCU11/0254Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 41.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.