Council archive · source document
001AA83A.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checktist, Version 22
. | FREMOVALADES TRUCTIONOR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT; WILD RIVERAREAR CMR OME Ey Rn EE]
/ Is any of the proposed operational work removing, destroying or damaging marine plants under the Fisheries Act.1994? ,
IXYNo-Gotoasi5 ([]Yes — ‘
If yes, is the proposed operational work reasonably necessary for: (Tick applicable box/es and answer (a) and/or (b) below) .
. (i) The removal, destruction or damage of dead marine wood on unallocated State land, other thanina !L]No |£J Yes
wild river area, for trade or commerce .
(ii) The maintenance of existing structures, including, for example, the following structures, if the | CINo | Yes
. Structures were constructed in compliance with ail the requirements, under any Act, relating to a ‘
structure of that type —. De
¢ — boat ramps, boardwalks, drains, fences, jetties, roads, safety signs, swimming enclosures and
, ; weirs; . ,
« — existing drainage structures; mo .
, ¢ __ existing powerlines or associated powerline infrastructure
an (iii) For educational or research purposes or for the monitoring the impact of development on marine LINo |() Yes :
plants _! . _ _f
(iv} For the construction or placement of structures, including, for example, swimming enclosures, safety |[(_] No |] Yes
signs, aids to navigation, fences, pontoons, public boat ramps and pipelines, if- .
' «The extent of the removal, destruction or damage is minor; and .
+ The structures were constructed in compliance with ail the requirements, under any Act, relating
to astructure of thattype =’ ol “9 , '
. . (v) For the construction of runnels for mosquito control, removal of Lyngbya, seed collection for site | DNno | Yes
- | __: tehabilitation or the collection of marine plants for fishing bail, or handicraft : | 7
(a) If yes to one or more of (i) - (v) above, does all the proposed operational work comply with any applicable Department of
, Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F) self-assessable code? | ; .
O Yes - A permit for that aspect of the operational work is not required. Go to Q4.15 O No - Go to (b) ‘
>, " (b) Ifo to all of (i) - (v) of no to (a) above, is that proposed operational work to be carried out in a wild river area declared.
under the Wild Rivers Act 2005? : oO
CO No- (Complete Form 1, Part 02) This appitcation requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries {OPI8F), if DPI&F is not :
. . the Assessment Manager for the appiication, the agéncy has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
. : Yes oo . . c.. . ; c
“e If is is all of the proposed operational work for specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
“ - L} Yes - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to :
co “+ .+ recelve it. (Complete Form 1, Part O2) This apptication requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries
"_ {OPI&F) and, subject to the dectaration for the relevant wikd river area, assessment for the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2005. if
* OPISF is.not. the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. :
LINo
. ' ¥ -
. "If no, is all of the proposed operational work necessary and unavoidable part of installing or maintaining works or
. infrastructure required to support other development for which a development permit is not required or, ifa
development permit is required, the permit is held or has been applied for?
, | Yes ~ Untess the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to
receive it. (Complete Form 1, Part Oz} This application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
{DPI&F) and, subject to the dectaration for the relevant wild river area, assessment for the purpases of the Wild Rivers Act 2005. if. - .
OPI&F is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
. } ‘ 0 No - An application for the operational work will be taken to be not Properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it.
‘ IPA, schedvte &, part i, table 4. dem 8: 1PA, schaicle 8 pad 2 rable 4, dem 4: Fisheries Regulation 1985 s 113A (se'F-assessatite codes): 1? Regutelion, schadsie 2. table 2 dem ZIP *
Reguiclicn, scheguia !. part 3, table 4, itor 8: Fshedes Act 1204. secheat 7608 jwiie river area): wiht Rivers Acl 2005; sochcnt 43A refovanl wid naw doctamtznr Wid Rivas Code
. Page 38 . .See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001AA83A.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
09/0695 - Operational Works - Driveway [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.