L04 Minor Change Planning Statement to NSC · MCU18/0013.02

2. PROPOSED CHANGES
The applicant proposes the following changes to the approved development:
   a. Additional concrete awning at rear of building to align with awning below. The additional
      awning uses similar beam detail as the level below and does not result in any changes to
      approved site cover, setbacks or building height.
   b. Changing the approved fence on the northern boundary to match the existing adjacent
      neighbouring boundary fence which is stepped (as shown in Figure 2 above).

The approved plans affected by the above changes have been revised by Shaun Lockyer Architects
and are attached and the extent of the changes are noted on the revised plans. The attached plans
are intended to replace all approved plans with the same name and those approved plans that have
not been altered are intended to remain.

The proposed changes are consistent with the conditions of approval and no changes to existing
conditions are proposed or considered necessary to facilitate the changes.



3. ASSESSMENT
An assessment of the proposed changes against the provisions of the Planning Act 2016 relating to
what defines a minor change is detailed below. The Planning Act 2016 states that a minor change:

      b) for a development approval, is a change to the approval that —
        (i) would not result in a substantially different development; and

      The proposed changes are not considered to be a substantially different development as
      detailed by the Development Assessment Rules which include:

         (a) involves a new use;

                No new use proposed.

         (b) results in the application applying to a new parcel of land;

                No new parcel of land to be utilised.

         (c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance;

                No dramatic changes to the built form.

         (d) changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended;

                No changes in the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended.

         (e) removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development;

                Does not remove a component that is integral to the operation of the development.

         (f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
         to the site;

                Does not significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport network.

         (g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts;

                Does not introduce new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts.

         (h) removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact
         of the development; or

                                                Page 3